Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1
Illustration of (A) initial insertion, (B) bidirectional expansion, and (C) injection of bone graft.
- Figure 2
Flowchart of subject screening and follow-up data availability.
- Figure 3
Patient-reported outcomes, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain, and VAS for back pain were significantly improved (decreased) from baseline (BL) to last follow-up (FU). *** indicates P < .001 based on Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.
- Figure 4
Examples of fusion in (A, B) a 2-level TLIF procedure and (C, D) a 1-level PLIF procedure. TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; PLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Tables
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population
- Biplanar Expandable Cages for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Are Safe and Achieve Good 1-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in an Asian Population