@article {Tome-Bermejo222, author = {F{\'e}lix Tome-Bermejo and Luis {\'A}lvarez-Galovich and {\'A}ngel R. Pi{\~n}era-Parrilla and Charles L. Mengis-Palleck and Javier Cervera-Irimia and Alicia Rodr{\'\i}guez-Bercial and Fernando Moreno-Mateo and {\'A}ngel Sutil-Blanco}, title = {Anterior 1-2 Level Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Disease: A Retrospective Study With Lordotic Porous Tantalum Cages. Long-Term Changes in Sagittal Alignment and Their Clinical and Radiological Implications After Cage Subsidence}, volume = {16}, number = {2}, pages = {222--232}, year = {2022}, doi = {10.14444/8207}, publisher = {International Journal of Spine Surgery}, abstract = {Background Despite the advances in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) as a reconstructive surgical technique, the rate of complications related to artificial implants remains high. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical course of ACCF with tantalum trabecular metal (TTM)-lordotic implants. Focus is placed on the relevance and influence of implant subsidence on sagittal alignment and the related clinical implications.Methods Retrospective, observational study of prospectively collected outcomes including 56 consecutive patients with degenerative cervical disc disease (myelopathy and/or radiculopathy). All patients underwent 1-level or 2-level ACCF with TTM-lordotic implants. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.85 years.Results The fusion rate at the end of follow-up was 98.11\% (52/53). Implant subsidence occurred in 44 (83.01\%) cases, including slight subsistence (\<3 mm) in 37 (69.81\%) and severe subsidence (\>3 mm) in 7 cases (13.2\%). The greatest degree of subsidence developed in the first 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.003). No patients presented a significant increase in implant subsidence beyond the second year of follow-up. The most common site of severe subsidence was the anterior region of the cranial end plate (4/7). At the end of follow-up, C1-C7 lordosis and segmental-Cobb angle of the fused segment increased on average by 5.06 {\textpm} 8.26 and 1.98 {\textpm} 6.02 degrees, respectively, though this difference failed to reach statistical significance (P \> 0.05). Visual analog scale and Neck Disability Index scores improved at the conclusion of follow-up (P \< 0.05).Conclusions ACCF with anterior cervical reconstruction using TTM-lordotic implants and anterior cervical plating for treatment of cervical degenerative disease has high fusion rates and good clinical outcome. The osteoconductive properties of TTM provide immediate stabilization and eliminate the need for bone grafts to ensure solid bone fusion. Before fusion occurs, asymptomatic implant settlement into the vertebral body is inevitable. However, lack of parallelism and reduced contact surface between the implant and the vertebral end plate are major risk factors for severe further subsidence, which may negatively affect the clinical outcomes.Level of Evidence 4.}, URL = {http://www.ijssurgery.com/content/16/2/222}, eprint = {http://www.ijssurgery.com/content/16/2/222.full.pdf}, journal = {International Journal of Spine Surgery} }