Table

Variables of included studies.

NameDesignSurgical TechniquesComparisonnFindingsOperative Time, meanVAS-Leg
(preop)
VAS-Leg
(1-y postop)
VAS-Back
(preop)
VAS-Back
(1-y postop)
ODI
(preop)
ODI
(1-y postop)
Complic-ations
Ruetten et al, 2006Prospective studyUEILDNA3311. Improved VAS, ODI, NASS scores 2. Neurological deficit significantly reduced29 min7.40.82.12.27922NA
Wu et al, 2020Prospective cohort studyUEILDNA1061. Improved VAS, ODI, NASS, MacNab scores 2. Fewer
complication 3. Shorter hospitalizaiton duration
68.9 min7.71.16.81.562120.94%
Ruetten et al, 2009Prospective randomized controlled studyUEILDMicroscopic decompression1611. Improved VAS, ODI, NASS scores 2. Neurological deficit significantly reduced 3. Shorter operating time 4. Lower complication rates 5. Postop pain reduced34 min7.30.71.60.978201.20%
Komp et al, 2015Prospective randomized controlled studyUEILDMicroscopic decompression1351. Improved VAS, ODI, NASS scores 2. Neurological deficit significantly reduced 3. Postop pain reduced 4. Shorter hospitalizaiton duration 5. Fewer complications42 min8.51.82.31.684295%
Angela Carrascosa-Granada
2020
Prospective, randomized, double-blind studyUEILDMicroscopic decompression201. Improved ODI, JOA scores 2. Improved walking claudication distance 3. Less blood loss 4. Less disability at 6 mo125 min8.0 (overall)0 (overall)NANA72620%
Kim et al, 2020Retrospective cohortUniportal endoscopic translaminar lumbar decompressionMicroscopic decompression601. Improved VAS, ODI, and MacNab scores (1 wk) 2. Lower serum CPK and CRP enzyme (day 1 d) 3. Lower horiziontal displacement58.1 min7.1 (overall)1.2 (overall)NANA71.223.53%
Lee et al, 2019Retrospective cohortUEILDTubular and microscopic decompression2701. Less immediate postop pain 2. Less increase in CPK 3. Shorter hospitalizaiton duration84 min72.562.269.8347.90%
Lee et al, 2018Meta-analysisUEILDN/A1561.Improved VAS, ODI scores69–122 minDifference in means: 5.95Difference in means: 4.22Difference in means: 41.712.70%
Heo et al, 2019Retrospective cohortUEILDBiportal and microscopic decompression97Lower mean dural expansion61.6 min7.91.971.856.723.511%
Hasan et al, 2019Retrospective cohortUEILDMicroscopic decompression451. Improved VAS, ODI scores 2. Less blood loss 3. Shorter hospitalization duration 4. Fewer periopertaive complications and reoperationsNA6.61.55.81.852.819.97%
Pairuchvej et al, 2019Systemic review and meta-analysisUEILDBiportal and microscopic decompression9941. Improved VAS score 2. Fewer complications 3. Significant lower leg painNANANANANANANANA
Wei et al, 2021Network meta-analysisEndoscopic decompressionInterspinous process spacer device, laminectomy, laminotomy, minimally invasive decompression, non-surgery, split-decompression, decompresison, decompression plus fusion43411. Better short- and long-term disability change 2. Lower complications 3. Shortest hospitalization durationNANANANANANANANA
  • NA, not available; NASS, North American Spine Society ; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; postop, postoperative; UEILD, uniportal endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression; VAS, visual analog scale.