Table 1

Results of included studies.

Author (Year)Study Time Span, yInterventionAge, y, Mean (±SD or range)Levels OperatedNPreoperative Score, Mean (±SD)Postoperative Score, Mean (±SD)Utility Measurement Tool
Comparative studies
 Chen et al (2019)3ACDF46.8 (±6.0)1 level307.49 (±2.39)14.59 (±1.22)JOA
ACDA48.5 (±4.6)1 level307.38 (±2.41)15.42 (±0.46)
 Cheng et al (2011)3ACDF47.7 (±5.8)1 level (n = 21)429.00 (±1.20)14.80 (±1.20)JOA
2 level (n = 17)
3 level (n = 4)
ACDA47.2 (±5.7)1 level (n = 24)419.00 (±1.20)15.20 (±1.20)
2 levels (n = 14)
3 levels (n = 3)
 Sun et al (2020)1Normal ACDF52.4 (±10.1)1 level318.90 (±1.40)13.60 (±1.50)JOA
Distraction ACDF51.6 (±8.9)1 level308.80 (±1.50)13.30 (±1.50)
 Sorar et al (2007)2.7ACDF531 level (n = 5)1412.80 (±0.50)15.60 (±0.40)mJOA
2 levels (n = 9)
Corpectomy59.32 levels (n = 2)6
3 levels (n = 4)
 Pescatori et al (2020)3Corpectomy (mild/moderate CDM)57.4 (±10.6)1 level (n = 22)3013.23 (-)16.00 (-)mJOA
2 levels (n = 25)
Corpectomy (severe CDM)3 levels (n = 13)307.26 (-)12.66 (-)
Cohort studies
 Li et al (2019)1Anterior (anterior cervical discectomy + ACDF + corpectomy)50 (±8.55)1 level (n = 54)11711.47 (±1.27)14.67 (±1.27)JOA1
54.0 (±8.77)2 levels (n = 45)
57.7 (±9.14)3 levels (n = 18)
 Pandita et al (2018)1ACDF51.0 (±9.38)1 level (n = 23)3012.40 (±3.68)14.92 (±3.24)mJOA, Nurick
2 levels (n = 7)
 Zika et al (2020)5ACDF50.8 (39–70)1 level (n = 9)3610.80 (±1.90)15.50 (±3.00)mJOA
2 levels (n = 17)
3 levels (n = 8)
4 levels (n = 2)
 Zhang et al (2020)5ACDF54.9 (±9.62)-3511.98 (±2.21)16.54 (±1.07)mJOA
 Pehlivanoglu et al (2019)2ACDA52.4 (37–69)1 level (n = 15)1811.30 (±0.30)16.60 (±0.10)JOA
2 levels (n = 3)
 Tian et al (2010)3.49 (mean)ACDA50.9 (29–73)1 level (n = 39)5014.00 (-)16.50 (-)JOA
2 levels (n = 11)
  • ACDA, anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty; ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; CDM, cervical degenerative myelopathy; JOA, Japanese Orthopedic Association score; mJOA, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score.