Table 4

Impact of body mass index on MCID achievement.

PROM6 wk12 wk6 mo1 y2 yOverall
VAS back n = 89 n = 85 n = 82 n = 16 n = 8 n = 146
 Nonobese43.4% (56)44.7% (38)45.1% (37)12.5% (2)37.5% (3)45.9% (67)
 Obese I31.5% (28)31.7% (27)29.3% (24)43.8% (7)37.5% (3)27.4% (40)
 Severe + morbid23.6% (21)23.5% (20)25.6% (21)43.8% (7)25.0% (2)26.7% (39)
P valuea 0.4250.2790.7830.1060.1841.000
VAS leg n = 31 n = 30 n = 38 n = 13 n = 9 n = 59
 Nonobese38.7% (12)40.0% (12)44.7% (17)30.8% (4)33.3% (3)39.0% (23)
 Obese I38.7% (12)30.0% (9)29.0% (11)38.5% (5)22.2% (2)28.8% (17)
 Severe + morbid22.6% (7)30.0% (9)26.3% (10)30.8% (4)44.4% (4)32.2% (19)
P valuea 0.3230.8300.7010.6460.8660.424
Owestry Disability Index n = 19 n = 24 n = 39 n = 15 n = 5 n = 50
 Nonobese31.6% (6)29.2% (7)38.5% (15)6.7% (1)20.0% (1) 34.0% (17)
 Obese I26.3% (5)25.0% (6)25.6% (10)40.0% (6)0.0% (0) 24.0% (12)
 Severe + morbid42.1% (8)45.8% (11)35.9% (14)53.3% (8)80.0% (4) 42.0% (21)
P valuea 0.6400.3390.8230.0530.230 0.023
12-Item Short Form physical composite score n = 16 n = 20 n = 17 n = 19 n = 11 n = 48
 Nonobese50.0% (8)40.0% (8)52.9% (9)31.6% (6)45.5% (5)37.5% (18)
 Obese I25.0% (4)30.0% (6)29.4% (5)26.3% (5)36.4% (4)33.3% (16)
 Severe + morbid25.0% (4)30.0% (6)17.7% (3)42.1% (8)18.2% (2)29.2% (14)
P valuea 0.4450.8910.4840.5870.6310.409
PROMIS-PF n = 8 n = 9 n = 14 n = 13 n = 7 n = 26
 Nonobese75.0% (6)66.7% (6)50.0% (7)23.1% (3)42.9% (3)38.5% (10)
 Obese I25.0% (2)33.3% (3)28.6% (4)30.8% (4)28.6% (2)30.8% (8)
 Severe + morbid0.0% (0)0.0% (0)21.4% (3)46.2% (6)28.6% (2)30.8% (8)
P valuea 0.0960.0760.3760.5710.9270.723
  • Abbreviations: MCID, minimum clinically important difference; PROM, patient-reported outcome measure; PROMIS-PF, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function.

  • Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance.

  • a P values calculated using χ2 analysis.