Table 3

Radiation exposure data comparison in the 2 groups.

VariableO-arm Group
(n = 62)
Surgivisio Group
(n = 61)
P Valuea
2D imaging duration, s25.99 ± 15.35 (7.17–84.87)32.66 ± 20.06 (9–156)0.04
No. of 3D acquisitions/patient1.63 ± 0.96 (1–5)1.01 ± 0.30 (1–2)<0.001
Dose-length product, mGy·cm622 ± 454 (88–2155)--
Overall DAP, mGy·cm2 -5326 ± 4180 (1258–25,090)-
DAP related to 2D, mGy·cm2 10,222 ± 93,306 (1173–63,331)2294 ± 2524 (344–13,298)<0.001
Overall effective dose, mSv11.47 ± 7.32 (2.92–33.59)1.14 ± 0.67 (0.42–4.08)<0.001
Effective dose per level, mSv9.83 ± 6.94 (1.82–33.59)0.88 ± 0.47 (0.24–2.82)<0.001
Effective dose related to 2D, mSv2.24 ± 1.80 (0.10–7.32)0.47 ± 0.41 (0.12–2.57)<0.001
Effective dose related to 3D, mSv9.22 ± 6.78 (1.31–32.33)0.67 ± 0.37 (0.22–2.18)<0.001
Effective dose per 3D acquisition, mSv5.84 ± 3.12 (1.31–12.56)0.60 ± 0.27 (0.22–1.33)<0.001
Effective dose related to 2D calculated with w b, mSv2.39 ± 2.19 (0.22–14.25)0.57 ± 0.66 (0.07–3.46)<0.001
Absolute risk of radiation-induced cancer equivalent to a whole-body exposure, %4.9 × 10−4 ± 3.5 × 10−4 (9.1 × 10−5 − 1.7 × 10−3)5.7 × 10−5 ± 3.4 × 10−5 (2.2 × 10−5 − 2.0 × 10−4)<0.001
  • Abbreviations: 2D, 2-dimensional; 3D, 3-dimensional; DAP, dose-area product; E, effective dose.

  • Note: Results are expressed as mean ± SD (range) in their respective units.

  • a Student t test.

  • b w is the conversion factor used to calculate the effective dose from the DAP: 0.19 for thoracic and 0.26 mSv/Gy·cm2 for lumbar spine.17