Table 2

Summary of surgerical procedures and resulting subsidence occurrence by study.

Authors (Year)No. of Patients
at Final Follow-Up
No. of LevelsPostoperative Follow-UpPedicle ScrewsImplant TypeSubsidence ConsideredSubsidence OccurrencePathology CriteriaRadiological AssessmentsClinical Assessments
ALIF
Behrbalk et al (2013)18 25322, 6, 12, and 18 moNoPEEK (Synthes SynFix-LR) cage>1 mm5/32 (15.6%)a Only patients with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis were includedCT or x-ray imagingN/A
Kuang et al (2017)26 42503, 12, and 24 moNoSelf-anchored stand-alone PEEK cage (ROI-A Oblique; LDR Medical)Any compromise to the endplate3/50 (6%)a All spinal pathology considered
Excluded high BMI (≥28 kg/m2), severe osteoporosis, spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and spondylolisthesis
CT or x-ray imagingN/A
Lee et al (2017)27 262612 and 24 moNoSynfix PEEK cage (Synthes)Any breakage of the endplate4/26 (15.4%)Included patients with lower back pain, severe disc space narrowing, and moderate grade of spondylolisthesis;
excluded patients with deformity, history of lumbar surgery, or ossification of the ligamentum flavum
CTVAS
Phan et al (2017)28 137N/A6 wkNoSynFix-LR PEEK integral cage device (Depuy)>2 mm<49 y old
2/45 (4.4%)
50–63 y old
2/46 (4.3%)
>64 y old
10/46 (21.7%)
No age consideration
14/137 (10.2%)
All spinal pathology consideredCTODI and SF-12
Rao et al (2017)29 147N/A6 wk and 18 moNoSynFix-LR PEEK integral (Depuy) for 89.1% of the patients>2 mm15/147 (10.2%)All spinal pathology consideredCT and x-ray imagingODI, VAS, and SF-12
Tu et al (2018)30 13N/A3, 12, and 24 moNoPEEK cages (ROI-A Oblique; LDR Medical)>2 mm3/13 (23.1%)Included patients with ASD, all patients with additional spinal pathologies that were not severe were also includedCT and x-ray imagingVAS, ODI, SF-36, and Macnab criteria
LLIF
Marchi et al (2013)12 74982, 6 wk, 3, 6, and 12 moNo46 with standard cages (18 mm)
28 with wide cages (22 mm) (CoRoent, NuVasive)
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate30%a for the standard cages and 11%a for the wide cagesMost spinal pathology included; excluded patients with damaged spine structure, compromised vertebral bodies, presence of neuromuscular disease, severe central stenosis, and significant instability and scoliosisCTVAS and ODI
Tohmeh et al (2014)31 14022312 mo minimum (average last follow-up at 15.5 mo)Yes18- and 22-mm PEEK cages (CoRoent;
NuVasive)
>1 mm,
2–4 mm,
>4 mm
>1 mm; 15/223 (6.7%)a
2–4 mm; 71/223 (31.8%)a
>4 mm; 53/223 (23.8%)a
All spinal pathology consideredFluoroscopy and CTODI, VAS, and SF-36
Kotwal et al (2015)32 118237Minimum of 24 mo (average last follow-up at 27.5 mo)YesPEEK cages (Nuvasive) for 112 patients and carbon fiber cages (Depuy Spine) for 6 patients>2 mm34/237 (14.3%)a Included neurological claudication with deformity or instability, scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, and junctional disc degenerationX-ray imagingVAS, ODI, and SF-12
Malham et al (2015)33 b 1281786 wk and 3, 6, and 12 mo (average last follow-up at 25.1 mo)56 without and 72 with fixationsPEEK cages with 18- and 22-mm width (NuVasive)Compromised endplate13/125 (10.4%)
6 had pedicle screws and 7 didn’t have the posterior fixation
All spinal pathology consideredCTVAS, ODI, and SF-36
Tempel et al (2015)34 33571212 moNo22-mm wide PEEK cagesA loss of more than 25% of the disc height29/335 (8.7%) patients with subsidenceAll spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingN/A
Isaacs et al (2016)35 29366, 12 wk, 6, 12, and 24 moYes16 patients with 18-mm width titanium cages (CoRoent XL, NuVasive), 86 patients with 18-mm width PEEK XLIF (NuVasive)>3 mm1/30 (3.3%)Only patients with grade I or II degenerative spondylolisthesis were consideredCT (12 mo)VAS, ODI, and SF-36
Yen et al (2017)10 1402471, 3, 6, and 12 mo37.1% No 62.9% Yes18–22-mm wide 50–60-mm long PEEK cagesA loss of more than 25% of the disc height22/79 (27.8%)a without pedicle screws,
30/168 (17.9%)a with pedicle screws
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingN/A
Du et al (2017)36 39396 moYes18–22-mm wide cagesLow grade; >25% cage collapsed in the endplate
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate
Low grade; 2/39 (5%)
High grade; 0%
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingODI, VAS, and SF-12
Bocahut et al (2018)9 698212 moNoAvenue L cage (Zimmer)>4 mm20/63 (32%)All spinal pathology consideredCT imagingVAS and ODI
Tempel et al (2018)34 2976236 wk, 3, 6, 12, and 24 moNo18-h and 22-mm wide PEEKLow grade; >25% cage collapsed in the endplate
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate
Low grade;
12/297 (4.04%)
High grade; 22/297 (7.4%)
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imaging and CTN/A
Chen et al (2019)23 1071263 d, 3, 12, and 24 moNoPEEK cagesLow grade; >25% cage collapsed
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate
High grade; (26.9%)Included all patients with degenerative diseaseX-ray imaging and CT JOA and VAS
Jung et al (2019)37 84841, 3, 6, 12, and 24 moYesPEEK cages>3 mmPatients with osteopenia 7/41 (17.1%)
Patients with normal bone mineral density 4/43 (9.3%)
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Ko et al (2019)38 2929Minimum of 12 mo (average last follow-up at 33.6 mo)YesPEEK with titanium coating Clydesdale cage (Medtronic)>2 mm6/29 (20.7%)Included only patients with degenerative spondylolisthesisX-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Park et al (2019)39 40623 and 24 moNoN/ALow grade; >25% cage collapsed in the endplate
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate
Low grade;
11/62 (17.7%)a
High grade; 8/62 (12.9%)a
Included only patients with ASD needing revision surgeryX-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Rentenberger et al (2019)40 12225812 moNoPEEK cage Nuvasive Inc. or COUGAR system (Depuy)High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplateHigh grade; 69/258 (26.7%)a All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imaging and CTN/A
Agarwal et al (2020)41 2976236 wk, 3, 6, 12, and 24 moNo18- and 22-mm cagesLow grade; >25% cage collapsed in the endplate
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate
Low grade;
10/297 (3.4%)
High grade; 20/297 (6.7%)
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingN/A
Okano et al (2020)42 96210Between 6 and 12 moNoPEEK cage (Nuvasive) or COUGAR system (Depuy Spine)High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate38/96 (39.6%)
58/210 (27.6%)a
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imaging or CTN/A
OLIF
Woods et al (2017)43 1373406 moYesPEEK with titanium coating (Medtronic CLYDESDALE)Any breach of the endplate adjacent to disc space6/137 (4.4%)All spinal pathology consideredCT and x-ray imagingN/A
Lin et al (2018)44 25256, 12, and 24 moYesPEEK Clydesdale; (Medtronic)>2 mm3/20 (15%)All spinal pathology considered
Excluded patients with severe canal stenosis, spinal tumor, infection, fractures, and previous L4-L5 surgery
X-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Chang et al (2019)45 1692623, 6, and 12 moYesPEEK cages>25% cage collapsed in the endplate62/168 (36.9%)
85/261 (32.6%)a
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingODI, SF-36, VAS, and JOA back pain evaluation questionnaire
Lin et al (2019)13 671076, 12, and 24 moYes18–22-mm wide, 8–16-mm high, 40–55-mm long, PEEK cages Clydesdale (Medtronic)>3 mm19/107 (17.8%)a Included all degenerative spinal disease
Excluded infection, trauma, neoplasm, and patient with previous lumbar surgery
CTVAS, ODI, and Macnab criteria
Liu and Feng (2019)46 1420Minimum of 12 mo (last follow-up in the range of 12–45 mo)Yes(Clydesdale Spinal System, Medtronic)>25% cage collapsed in the endplate1/14 (7.1%)Included all degenerative spinal disease
Excluded infection, spinal tumor, vertebral fracture, hypertrophic ligamentum flavum, lesions involving L5-S1, fused facet, and patient with severe spondylolisthesis
X-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Mun et al (2019)47 7474Minimum 6 mo (average last follow-up at 12.1 mo)YesLarge round PEEK cage (Perimeter, Medtronic)>2 mm(25.3%)All spinal pathology considered
Excluded patient with infection, tumor, and congenital anomalies
X-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Wen et al (2019)48 747424 moYes;
bilateral and uni-lateral
N/AHigh grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplateHigh grade; 13/74 (17.6%)All spinal pathology considered
Excluded high BMI (≥35 kg/m2), severe osteoporosis, lumbar infection, lumbar tumor, and patient with previous lumbar surgery
X-ray imagingVAS and ODI
PLIF
Suzuki et al (2013)49 1919Minimum 12 mo (average last follow-up at 54.6 mo)Yes2 PEEK, parallelepiped (REC) cages 16.4–14.6 wide 12.0–11.0 high (Telamon-S/-C/-, 22.0 mm length; Medtronic) or Brantigan I/F cage 11.0 mm wide, 11.0 mm height, 23.0 mm length (Depuy, Raynhem)>2 mm3/19 (15.8%)Included patients with osteoporotic vertebral collapse with neurologic deficitX-ray imagingVAS
Lee et al (2017)27 303012 and 24 moYes2 PEEK cages (Medtronic)Any breakage of the endplate3/30 (10%)Included patients with lower back pain, leg pain, neurogenic intermittent claudication, moderate disc space narrowing, and severe grade of spondylolisthesis
Excluded, patient with deformity, with history of lumbar surgery, and ossification of the ligamentum flavum
CT imagingVAS
Oh et al (2017)50 1291393, 6, and 12 mo; Minimum of 12 mo (average last follow-up at 49.2 mo)YesPEEK cage (O.I.C. cages; Stryker)1–3 and >3 mm>3 mm 22/139 (15.8%)a All spinal pathology consideredCT imagingVAS, ODI, and SF-36
Tu et al (2018)30 27N/A3, 12, and 24 moYesPEEK cages (Libeier; Orthopedic)>2 mm2/27 (7.4%)Included patients with ASD (all patients with additional spinal pathologies who were not severe were also included)CTVAS, ODI, SF-36, and Macnab criteria
Park et al (2019)39 40443 and 24 moYesN/ALow grade; >25% cage collapsed in the endplate
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate
Low grade;
10/44 (22.7%)a
High grade; 4/44 (9.1%)a
Included only patients with ASD needing revision surgeryX-ray imagingVAS and ODI
TLIF
Kim et al (2013)14 104122Minimum 24 mo (last follow-up range from 24 to 45 mo)YesBullet-shaped PEEK cage (Capstone; Medtronic)>2 mm>2 mm; 10/122 (8.2%)a
>4 mm; 8/122 (6.6%)a
All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingN/A
Isaacs et al (2016)35 26296, 12 wk; 6, 12, and 24 moYesPEEK cages>3 mm2/26 (7.7%)Included only patients with grade I or II degenerative spondylolisthesisCT (12 mo) and magnetic resonance imaging (3 mo)VAS, ODI, and SF-36
Choi et al (2016)51 21216 and 12 moYesBanana-shaped cage (Crescent, Medtronic) or
straight cage (Opal, Depuy)
>2 mm7/21 (33.3%)All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imaging and CTVAS, ODI, and patient satisfaction rate
Kuang et al (2017)26 40483, 12, and 24 moYesPEEK cage (Libeier)Any compromise to the endplateNo cage subsidenceMost spinal pathology considered
Excluded high BMI (≥28 kg/m2), severe osteoporosis, spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and spondylolisthesis
CT or x-ray imaging
Lee et al (2017)27 212112 and 24 moYesPEEK Capstone cage (Medtronic)Any breakage of the endplate8/21 (38.1%)Included patients with lower back pain, leg pain, moderate disc space narrowing, and unilateral intervertebral foraminal stenosis
Excluded, patients with deformity, with history of lumbar surgery, or ossification of the ligament flavum
CTVAS score
Lin et al (2017)11 76763, 6, 12, and 24 moYesBanana-shaped cage or straight cage>2 mm14/30 (46.7%)Included symptomatic spinal stenosis, grade I and II spondylolisthesis, herniated nucleus pulposus, and other clinical symptoms
Excluded patients with previous lumbar surgery
CTVAS and ODI
Choi et al (2018)52 84846 and 12 moYesBanana-shaped cage (Crescent, Medtronic)
Straight cage (Opal, Depuy)
>2 mmBanana-shaped;
14/44 (31.8%)
Straight cages;
7/40 (17.5%)
All spinal pathology considered
Excluded patients with metabolic bone disease, infection, spinal trauma, and tumors
X-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Lin et al (2018)44 25256, 12, and 24 moYesPEEK Opal (Depuy) or PEEK Capstone (Medtronic)>2 mm6/20 (30%)Most spinal pathology considered
Excluded patients with severe canal stenosis, spinal tumor, infection, fractures, and previous L4-L5 surgery
X-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Pereira et al (2018)7 1171176 and 12 moYesBullet-shaped PEEK cage>3 mm25/117 (21.4%)All spinal pathology considered
Excluded patients with infection, tumor, trauma, and previous lumbar surgery
CTODI, Odom criteria, and Stanford score
Ko et al (2019)38 4141Minimum 12 mo (average last follow-up at 27.2 mo)YesPEEK capstone cage (Medtronic)>2 mm21/41 (51.2%)Included only patients with degenerative spondylolisthesisX-ray imaging and CTVAS and ODI
Mun et al (2019)47 7474Minimum 6 mo (average last follow-up at 22.3 mo)YesA single (PEEK) cage (Capstone, Medtronic)>2 mm(25.3%)All spinal pathology considered
Excluded patients with infection, tumor, and congenital anomalies
X-ray imagingVAS and ODI
Park et al (2019)53 78488118 moYesINNESIS PEEK cages (BK MEDITECH)
Rotation-type cages (PLIVIOS PEEK cages [Depuy, Raynham])
Bullet-shaped cages (Capstone PEEK cages [Medtronic])
>2 mm36/881 (4.1%)a All spinal pathology consideredX-ray imagingN/A
Zhou et al (2019)54 1451453, 6, and 12 moYesPEEK cage (Capstone, Medtronic)>2 mm23/145 (15.9%)All spinal pathology considered
Excluded patients with infection, tumor, trauma, and previous lumbar surgery
X-ray and CT imagingVAS and ODI
Zhao et al
(2020)5
767660 moContoured and straight rodPEEK material and cuboid shape (arched appearance) from StrykerLow grade; >25% cage collapsed in the endplate
High grade; >50% cage collapsed in the endplate
Low grade;
9/76 (11.8%)
High grade; 6/76 (7.9%)
Most spinal pathology considered
Excluded patients with previous lumbar surgery history, neurological lesions, peripheral neuropathy and other diseases entities
X-ray imagingVAS, ODI, and JOA
  • Abbreviations: ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ASD, adjacent segment disease; BMI, body mass index; CT, computed tomography; JOA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association ; LLIF, lateral lumbar interbody fusion; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; OLIF, oblique lumbar interbody fusion; PEEK, polyetheretherketone; PLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion; SF-12, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey; TLIF, transverse lumbar interbody fusion; VAS, visual analog scale; XLIF, extreme lateral interbody fusion.

  • a Subsidence reported by levels.

  • b Less than 80% follow-up.