Table 1

Summary of literature review for amniotic membrane–derived biologic agents on postoperative outcomes following spinal surgery.

StudyDesignTissue TypeObjectiveMethodsResults
Animal Studies
Bolat et al33 (2013)Retrospective animal (rat) studyHAFEvaluate effects of mitomycin-C, sodium hyaluronate, and amniotic fluid on prevention of spinal epidural fibrosisA total of 4 groups (10 each): control, mitomycin-C, sodium hyaluronate, and amniotic fluid. L5 total laminectomy performed and assessed for epidural fibrosis 4-wk postoperativeSignificant difference in amount of scar tissue (none) in experimental groups compared with control group
Choi et al34 (2011)Experimental animal (rat) studyFAMEvaluate effects of amniotic membrane on epidural adhesions after laminectomyA total of 20 rats, 2 groups. Laminectomy with or without amniotic membrane. Assessment at 1-, 3-, and 8-wk postoperativeSignificant decrease in amount and tenacity of scar tissue in amniotic membrane group
Cunningham et al35 (2019)Experimental animal (sheep) studyDual-layer, chorion-free amnion patch from HAMEvaluate effect of dual-layer, chorion-free amnion path following lumbar laminectomyA total of 12 sheep, 2 groups: control and amnion. Laminectomy performed with or without amnion, and half were evaluated at 4 wk, half at 10 wkSignificant decrease in amount of fibroblast infiltration and tissue tenacity with the use of amnion
Goldschlager et al36 (2011)Experimental animal (sheep) studyAECsComparison of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells to AECs in promoting osteogenesisA total of 29 sheep divided into 5 groups: (1) C3-C4 ACDF with autograft IC and IBC, (2) HA/TCP Mastergraft granules alone, (3) HA/TCP with 5 million MPCs, (4) HA/TCP with 5 million AECs, and (5) nonoperativeMPCs lead to significantly more fusion than any other group, and all AECs failed to have any fusion at all
Kara et al38 (2015)Experimental animal (rat) studyHAF and HAMEvaluate effectiveness of amniotic fluid and membrane on prevention of postlaminectomy spinal epidural fibrosisA total of 27 rats underwent 2 nonconsecutive lumbar laminectomies were divided into either: (1) laminectomy alone, (2) laminectomy + AM, (3) laminectomy + AF. Sacrificed at 6 wkNo significant differences between groups in regard to epidural scar formation and mean fibroblast count
Luo et al39 (2019)Experimental animal (rabbit) studyAmniotic suspension allograft containing particulated HAM and HAFEvaluate whether amniotic suspension allograft increases intervertebral disc height and morphology after disc degenerationA total of 12 rabbits underwent disc puncture and then 4 wk later were injected with either amniotic suspension allograft, sham control, or were left untreated. Assessed over 12 wkAt 12 wk, experimental group had significantly greater disc height, magnetic resonance imaging T2 relaxation times, and improved morphology compared with control and untreated groups
Oner et al40 (2015)Experimental animal (rat) studyHAFAssessment of 2 different bone grafts and amniotic fluid on vertebral fusion in rat modelA total of 48 rats were randomized into 1 of 4 groups: allograft group, allograft plus AF, DBM group, or DBM plus AF. Fusion of spine was assessed at 8 wkAmniotic fluid significantly enhanced posterior spinal fusion when combined with allograft
Tao and Fan42 (2009)Experimental animal (dog) studyFAM, CAM, and AFFEvaluate whether AM can reduce epidural scar adhesion after laminectomy in canine modelA total of 24 dogs underwent laminectomy at L1, L3, L5, and L7 with FAM, CAM, AFF, and no treatment assigned randomly to each of the 4 sites. Animals were sacrificed at 1, 6, and 12 wk postoperativeCAM group had significantly lower amounts of epidural fibrosis compared with controls
Human Studies
Anderson et al32 (2017)Prospective, RCTCryopreserved amniotic membrane (cAM)Compare pain, functional outcomes and recurrent herniation follow lumbar microdiscectomy w/ or w/o amniotic tissue graftA total of 80 patients randomized to either amniotic tissue or no tissue following elective lumbar microdiscectomyAM group had greater functional outcomes and no recurrent herniations at 2 years
Kamson and Smith37 (2020)Prospective, RCTCryopreserved amniotic-derived productsComparison of PROM after use of orthobiologic supplementation during endoscopic-assisted lumbar decompression surgeryA total of 269 patients randomized to receive either amniotic membrane, bone marrow aspiration, both, or none during lumbar decompressionPatients receiving either bone marrow aspirate or amniotic membrane had significantly decreased pain at all timepoints compared with control
Subach and Copay41 (2015)Retrospective case seriesDehydrated human amnion/chorion membraneEvaluation of AM on epidural scar formation after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionA total of 5 patients who had transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with AM who subsequently underwent epidural re-explorationFour of 5 cases had easily detachable tissue during epidural re-exploration
Walker et al43 (2018)Retrospective case seriesHAMEvaluate HAM in the prevention of spinal retethering after detetheringA total of 14 patients received HAM after detethering. Followed for minimum of 6 moOnly 1 patient required subsequent detethering
  • Abbreviations: ACDF, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; AECs, amnion-derived epithelial cells; AF, amniotic fluid; AFF, autologous-free fat; AM, amniotic membrane; CAM, cross-linked amniotic membrane; DBM, demineralized bone matrix; FAM, freeze-dried human amniotic membrane; HAF, human amniotic fluid; HA/TCP, hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate; IBC, interbody cage; IC, iliac crest autograft; MPCs, mesenchymal precursor cells; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

  • Note: Boldface indicates the primary variables being measured or outcomes of interest in each selected study.