Table 2

Comparison of clinical outcomes at different postoperative intervals.

Comparison at 1 MoNondiabetics
(n = 30)
Diabetics (n = 30) P a
VAS back pain1.1 ± 2.30.4 ± 1.20.142
VAS leg pain1.2 ± 2.20.7 ± 2.00.301
ODI30.4 ± 15.431.1 ± 16.60.871
SF-36 PCS28.9 ± 9.732.5 ± 12.20.211
SF-36 MCS50.9 ± 11.748.6 ± 12.80.479
MCID attainment
 SF-36 PCS (4.9)14 (46.7%)13 (43.3%)0.795
 ODI (12.8)19 (63.3%)18 (60.0%)0.791
 VAS back pain (1.2)24 (80.0%)26 (86.7%)0.488
 VAS leg pain (1.6)24 (80.0%)25 (83.3%)0.739
Comparison at 3 MoNondiabetics
(n = 30)
Diabetics (n = 30) P a
VAS back pain0.8 ± 2.41.0 ± 2.00.686
VAS leg pain0.5 ± 1.91.0 ± 2.40.412
ODI21.0 ± 18.223.8 ± 17.00.553
SF-36 PCS44.3 ± 9.740.4 ± 11.50.168
SF-36 MCS55.1 ± 8.353.9 ± 12.10.670
MCID Attainment
 SF-36 PCS (4.9)27 (90.0%)16 (53.3%) 0.002
 ODI (12.8)27 (90.0%)20 (66.7%) 0.028
 VAS back pain (1.2)25 (83.3%)24 (80.0%)0.739
 VAS leg pain (1.6)24 (80.0%)25 (83.3%)0.739
Comparison at 6 MoNondiabetics
(n = 30)
Diabetics (n = 30) P a
VAS back pain0.7 ± 1.81.1 ± 2.30.539
VAS leg pain0.5 ± 1.41.1 ± 2.50.282
ODI13.6 ± 14.519.0 ± 15.50.169
SF-36 PCS45.9 ± 9.943.3 ± 11.10.348
SF-36 MCS54.9 ± 9.152.0 ± 10.20.248
MCID attainment
 SF-36 PCS (4.9)26 (86.7%)20 (66.7%)0.067
 ODI (12.8)29 (96.7%)24 (80.0%) 0.044
 VAS back pain (1.2)25 (83.3%)22 (73.3%)0.347
 VAS leg pain (1.6)26 (86.7%)23 (76.7%)0.317
Comparison at 2 YNondiabetics
(n = 30)
Diabetics (n = 30) P a
VAS back pain1.1 ± 2.50.8 ± 1.90.650
VAS leg pain0.4 ± 1.70.8 ± 2.20.469
ODI12.2 ± 17.915.1 ± 15.30.512
SF-36 PCS45.7 ± 10.544.7 ± 10.90.704
SF-36 MCS55.8 ± 10.750.5 ± 12.40.079
MCID attainment
 SF-36 PCS (4.9)25 (83.3%)22 (73.3%)0.347
 ODI (12.8)29 (96.7%)25 (83.3%)0.085
 VAS back pain (1.2)25 (83.3%)27 (90.0%)0.448
 VAS leg pain (1.6)25 (83.3%)25 (83.3%)1.000
  • Abbreviations: MCID, minimal clinically important difference; MCS, mental component score; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; PCS, physical component score; VAS, visual analog scale.

  • Note: Data presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. Boldface values indicate statistical significance (P < 0.05).

  • a P value was calculated for each category using χ2 analysis (categorical) or student’s t test (continuous).