Table 1

Characteristics of included studies

StudyMethodologyParticipantsInterventionOutcome
Suk et al.10 (Spine 1997)Retrospective with 3.3-y FU76 patients, aged 30-60 y, with spondylolytic spondylolisthesisGroup 1: 40 patients with PF (1988-1991) Group 2: 36 patients with PIF + PF (1991-1993)Kirkaldy-Willis criteria
Madan and Boeree9 (Spine 2002)Retrospective with 2.1-y FU44 patients (27 M and 17 F), aged 24-67 y, with isthmic spondylolisthesisGroup 1: 21 patients with PIF + PF Group 2: 21 patients with PFOswestry Disability Index, Zung Depression Scale, MSPQ, VAS, core set, and pain drwoing
Lidar et al.8 (Surg Neurol 2005)Retrospective with 2-y FU100 patients (60 M and 40 F), aged 42-50 y, with DDD (48), recurrent disc herniation (22), spondylolisthesis (16), or spinal stenosis (14)Group 1: 45 patients with PIF + non-instrumented fusion Group 2: 55 patients with PF with instrumentationProlo Economic and Functional Scale, complications, and fusion rate
Dehoux et al.6 (Acta Orthop Belg 2004)Prospective nonrandomized with 6-y FU52 patients, aged 14-63 y, with isthmic spondylolisthesisGroup 1: 27 patients with PIF Group 2: 25 patients with PFModified Beaujon score and fusion rate
La Rosa et al.7 (J Neurosurg 2003)Retrospective with 2-y FU35 patients (21 M and 14 F), aged 32-74 y, with isthmic spondylolisthesisGroup 1: 17 patients with PIF (1999-2000) Group 2: 18 patients with PF (1997-1999)Prolo Economic and Functional Scale
  • Abbreviations: DDD, degenerative disc disease; F, female; FU, follow-up; M, male; MSPQ, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire; VAS, visual analog scale.