Fusion

You have access
ISASS Policy 2016 Update – Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
Morgan P. Lorio

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2016, 10 26; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/3026
You have access
Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT^® Code 27279
Morgan Lorio, Melissa Martinson and Lisa Ferrara

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2016, 10 40; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/3040
You have access
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Minimally Affects Adjacent Lumbar Segment Motion: A Finite Element Study
Derek P. Lindsey, Ali Kiapour, Scott A. Yerby and Vijay K. Goel

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2015, 9 64; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/2064
Open Access
Segmental and global lordosis changes with two-level axial lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation
Miguel A Melgar, William D Tobler, Robert J Ernst, Thomas J Raley, Neel Anand, Larry E Miller and Richard J Nasca

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2014, 8 10; DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/1010
Open Access
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates in patients using a novel titanium implant and demineralized cancellous allograft bone sponge
Gerard Girasole, Gerard Muro, Abraham Mintz and Jason Chertoff

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2013, 7 e95-e100; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.08.001
Open Access
Arthroscopic discectomy and interbody fusion of the thoracic spine: A report of ipsilateral 2-portal approach
Said G. Osman, Jeremy A. Schwartz and E. B. Marsolais

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2012, 6 103-109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.004
Open Access
The effect of minimally invasive posterior cervical approaches versus open anterior approaches on neck pain and disability
Jeffrey A. Steinberg and John W. German

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2012, 6 55-61; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.11.003
Open Access
Cervical total disc replacement using a novel compressible prosthesis: Results from a prospective Food and Drug Administration–regulated feasibility study with 24-month follow-up
Carl Lauryssen, Domagoj Coric, Thomas Dimmig, David Musante, Donna D. Ohnmeiss and Harrison A. Stubbs

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2012, 6 71-77; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.02.001
Open Access
Complications with axial presacral lumbar interbody fusion: A 5-year postmarketing surveillance experience
Mukund I. Gundanna, Larry E. Miller and Jon E. Block

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2011, 5 (3) 90-94; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2011.03.002
Open Access
Cost comparison of patients with 3-level artificial total lumbar disc replacements versus 360° fusion at 3 contiguous lumbar vertebral levels: an analysis of compassionate use at 1 site of the US investigational device exemption clinical trial
Frank A. Buttacavoli, Rick B. Delamarter and Linda E.A. Kanim

International Journal of Spine Surgery January 2010, 4 (4) 107-114; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.07.002

Main menu

User menu

Search

Fusion

Pages

Content

More Information

More

Other Services