Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peridural scar and its relation to clinical outcome: a randomised study on surgically treated lumbar disc herniation patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective randomised 2-year follow-up study on patients undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery. The objective was to investigate the relationship between peridural scarring and clinical outcome, the scar development 6 and 24 months postoperatively by using MRI, and if ADCON-L (a bioresorbable carbohydrate polymer gel) has an effect on scar size and/or improve patients’ outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery. The association between peridural scarring and recurrent pain after lumbar disc herniation surgery is debated. Numerous materials have been used in attempts to prevent or reduce postoperative peridural scarring; however, there are conflicting data regarding the clinical effects. The study included 119 patients whose mean age was 39 years (18–66); 51 (47%) were women. Sixty patients (56%) were perioperatively randomised to receive ADCON-L, and 48 (44%) served as controls. All patients underwent MRI at 6 and 24 months postoperatively, and an independent radiologist graded the size, location and development of the scar, by using a previously described scoring system. Pre- and 2-year postoperatively patients graded their leg pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 2-year follow-up patients rated their satisfaction with treatment (subjective outcome) and were evaluated by an independent neurologist (objective outcome), using MacNab score. There was no relationship between size or localisation of the scar and any of the clinical outcomes (VAS, subjective and objective outcome). The scar size decreased between 6 and 24 months in 49%, was unchanged in 42% and increased in 9% of the patients. Patients treated with ADCON-L did not demonstrate any adverse effects, nor did they demonstrate less scarring or better clinical outcome than control patients. No significant association between the presence of extensive peridural scar or localisation of scar formation and clinical outcome could be detected in the present study. Further, no positive or negative effects of ADCON-L used in disc herniation surgery could be seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annertz M, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B et al (1995) Serial MRI in the early postoperative period after lumbar discectomy. Neuroradiology 37:177–182. doi:10.1007/BF01578253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB et al (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg 96:34–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Babar S, Saifuddin A (2002) MRI of the post-discectomy lumbar spine. Clin Radiol 57:969–981. doi:10.1053/crad.2002.1071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS et al (1992) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed after successful lumbar disk surgery: prospective study. Radiology 182:59–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burton CV, Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Yong-Hing K et al (1981) Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 157:191–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cervellini P, Curri D, Bernardi L et al (1988) Computed tomography after lumbar disc surgery: a comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 43:44–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. de Tribolet N, Porchet F, Lutz TW et al (1998) Clinical assessment of a novel antiadhesion barrier gel: prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial of ADCON-L to inhibit postoperative peridural fibrosis and related symptoms after lumbar discectomy. Am J Orthop 27:111–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Floris R, Spallone A, Aref TY et al (1997) Early postoperative MRI findings following surgery for herniated lumbar disc. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:169–175. doi:10.1007/BF01844746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganzer D, Giese K, Volker L et al (2003) Two-year results after lumbar microdiscectomy with and without prophylaxis of a peridural fibrosis using Adcon-L. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123:17–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grane P, Tullberg T, Rydberg J et al (1996) Postoperative lumbar MR imaging with contrast enhancement. Comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Acta Radiol 37:366–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hieb LD, Stevens DL (2001) Spontaneous postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks following application of anti-adhesion barrier gel: case report and review of the literature. Spine 26:748–751. doi:10.1097/00007632-200104010-00009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ivanic GM, Pink PT, Schneider F et al (2006) Prevention of epidural scarring after microdiscectomy: a randomized clinical trial comparing gel and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. Eur Spine J 15:1360–1366. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0120-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen TT, Asmussen K, Berg-Hansen EM et al (1996) First-time operation for lumbar disc herniation with or without free fat transplantation. Prospective triple-blind randomized study with reference to clinical factors and enhanced computed tomographic scan 1 year after operation. Spine 21:1072–1076. doi:10.1097/00007632-199605010-00016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim KD, Wang JC, Robertson DP et al (2004) Reduction of leg pain and lower-extremity weakness for 1 year with Oxiplex/SP gel following laminectomy, laminotomy, and discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 17:ECP1. doi:10.3171/foc.2004.17.1.8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn J, Hofmann B, Knitelius HO et al (2005) Bilateral subdural haematomata and lumbar pseudomeningocele due to a chronic leakage of liquor cerebrospinalis after a lumbar discectomy with the application of ADCON-L gel. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1031–1033. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.046276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Law JD, Lehman RA, Kirsch WM (1978) Reoperation after lumbar intervertebral disc surgery. J Neurosurg 48:259–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG et al (1999) Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317. doi:10.1097/00007632-199911150-00005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Macnab I (1973) Chapter 14. Pain and disability in degenerative disc disease. Clin Neurosurg 20:193–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maroon JC, Abla A, Bost J (1999) Association between peridural scar and persistent low back pain after lumbar discectomy. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S43–S46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nygaard OP, Kloster R, Dullerud R et al (1997) No association between peridural scar and outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:1095–1100. doi:10.1007/BF01410967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Olmarker K, Storkson R, Berge OG (2002) Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: a study of spontaneous behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation. Spine 27:1312–1317. doi:10.1097/00007632-200206150-00013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ozer AF, Oktenoglu T, Sasani M et al (2006) Preserving the ligamentum flavum in lumbar discectomy: a new technique that prevents scar tissue formation in the first 6 months postsurgery. Neurosurgery 59:ONS126–ONS133. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000220078.90175.E6 (discussion ONS-33)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Richter HP, Kast E, Tomczak R et al (2001) Results of applying ADCON-L gel after lumbar discectomy: the German ADCON-L study. J Neurosurg 95:179–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ross JS (1999) MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7:513–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC et al (1996) Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L European Study Group. Neurosurgery 38:855–861. doi:10.1097/00006123-199604000-00053 (discussion 61–63)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Samy Abdou M, Hardy RW Jr (1999) Epidural fibrosis and the failed back surgery syndrome: history and physical findings. Neurol Res 21(Suppl 1):S5–S8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schimizzi AL, Massie JB, Murphy M et al (2006) High-molecular-weight hyaluronan inhibits macrophage proliferation and cytokine release in the early wound of a preclinical postlaminectomy rat model. Spine J 6:550–556. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spangfort EV (1972) The lumbar disc herniation. A computer-aided analysis of 2, 504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 142:1–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tatsui CE, Martinez G, Li X et al (2006) Evaluation of DuraGen in preventing peridural fibrosis in rabbits. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 4:51–59. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.1.51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vakis A, Koutentakis D, Karabetsos D et al (2006) Use of polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute as adhesion preventive material during craniectomies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108:798–802. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.11.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van de Kelft EJ, van Goethem JW, de La Porte C et al (1996) Early postoperative gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging after successful lumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 10:41–49. doi:10.1080/02688699650040511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Goethem JW, Van de Kelft E, Biltjes IG et al (1996) MRI after successful lumbar discectomy. Neuroradiology 38(Suppl 1):S90–S96. doi:10.1007/BF02278130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vogelsang JP, Finkenstaedt M, Vogelsang M et al (1999) Recurrent pain after lumbar discectomy: the diagnostic value of peridural scar on MRI. Eur Spine J 8:475–479. doi:10.1007/s005860050208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Gothenburg Medical Society, Doctor Felix Neubergh Foundation for financial support and government grants during LUA agreement. We also thank MD Lena Rutberg, neurologist, for the assessment of clinical outcome 2-year postoperative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarina Rönnberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rönnberg, K., Lind, B., Zoega, B. et al. Peridural scar and its relation to clinical outcome: a randomised study on surgically treated lumbar disc herniation patients. Eur Spine J 17, 1714–1720 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0805-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0805-8

Keywords

Navigation