Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cervical radiculopathy: Pain, muscle weakness and sensory loss in patients with cervical radiculopathy treated with surgery, physiotherapy or cervical collar A prospective, controlled study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This prospective, randomised study compares the efficacy of surgery, physiotherapy and cervical collar with respect to pain, motor weakness and sensory loss in 81 patients with long-lasting cervical radiculopathy corresponding to a nerve root that was significantly compressed by spondylotic encroachment, with or without an additional bulging disk, as verified by MRI or CT-myelography. Pain intensity was registered on a visual analogue scale (VAS), muscle strength was measured by a hand-held dynamometer, Vigorometer and pinchometer. Sensory loss and paraesthesia were recorded. The measurements were performed before treatment (control 1), 4 months after the start of treatment (control 2) and after a further 12 months (control 3). A healthy control group was used for comparison and to test the reliability of the muscle-strength measurements. The study found that before start of treatment the groups were uniform with respect to pain, motor weakness and sensory loss. At control 2 the surgery group reported less pain, less sensory loss and had better muscle strength, measured as the ratio of the affected side to the non-affected side, compared to the two conservative treatment groups. After a further year (control 3), there were no differences in pain intensity, sensory loss or paraesthesia between the groups. An improvement in muscle strengths, measured as the ratio of the affected to the non-affected side, was seen in the surgery group compared to the physiotherapy group in wrist extension, elbow extension, shoulder abduction and internal rotation, but there were no differences in the ratios between the collar group and the other treatment groups. With respect to absolute muscle strength of the affected sides, there were no differences at control 1. At control 2, the surgery group performed somewhat better than the two other groups but at control 3 there were no differences between the groups. We conclude that pain intensity, muscle weakness and sensory loss can be expected to improve within a few months after surgery, while slow improvement with conservative treatments and recurrent symptoms in the surgery group make the 1-year results about equal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agre JC, Magness JL, Hull SZ, Wright KC, Baxter TL, et al (1987) Strength testing with a portable dynamometer: reliability for upper and lower extremities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:454–458

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 440–476

    Google Scholar 

  3. Backman E, Johansson V, Hager B, Sjoblom P, Henriksson KG (1995) Isometric muscle strength and muscular endurance in normal persons aged between 17 and 70 years. Scand J Rehabil Med 27:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balogun JA, Onigbinde AT (1992) Hand and leg dominance: do they really effect limb muscle strength? Physiother Theory Pract 8: 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barnes MP, Sanders M (1984) The effect of cervical mobility on the natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:17–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benini A (1987) Clinical features of cervical root compression C5–C8 and their variations. Neuroorthopedics 4:74–88

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bertalanffy H, Egger H-R (1988) Clinical long-term results of anterior discectomy without fusion for treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Acta Neurochir 90:127–135

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blair SJ, McCormick E, Bear-Lehman J, Ewing Fess E, Rader E (1987) Evaluation of impairment of the upper extremity. Clin Orthop 221:42–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bohannon RW (1986) Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Phys Ther 66:206–209

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bohannon RW, Andrews AW (1987) Interrater reliability of hand-held dynamometry. Phys Ther 67:931–933

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 9:1298–1307

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brigham CD, Tsahakis PJ (1995) Anterior cervical foraminotomy and fusion. Surgical technique and results. Spine 20:766–770

    Google Scholar 

  13. British Association of Physical Medicine (1966) Pain in the neck and arm: a multicentre trial of the effects of physiotherapy. BMJ 1:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clements DH, O'Leary PF (1990) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 15:1023–1025

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15:602–617

    Google Scholar 

  16. DePalma AF, Subin DK (1965) Study of the cervical syndrome. Clin Orthop 38:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  17. Depassio J (1992) Treatment of cervicobrachial neuralgia in orthopaedic medicine. J Neuroradiol 19:197–203

    Google Scholar 

  18. Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, Dutil E (1995) Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population. Scand Rehabit Med 27:137–143

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ellenberg MR, Hornet JC, Treanor WJ (1994) Cervical radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:342–352

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eriksen EF, Buhl M, Frode K, et al (1984) Treatment of cervical disc disease using Cloward's technique. The prognostic value of clinical preoperative data in 1106 patients. Acta Neurochir 70:181–197

    Google Scholar 

  21. Espersen JO, Buhl M, Eriksen EF, et al (1984) Treatment of cervical disc disease using Cloward's technique. General results, effects of different operative methods and complications in 1106 patients. Acta Neurochir 70:97–114

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fager CA (1993) Identification and management of radiculopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 4:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feinstein B, Langton JNK, Jameson RM, Schiller F (1954) Experiments on pain referred from deep somatic tissues. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 36:981–997

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garfin SR, Rydevik B, Lind B, Massie J (1995) Spinal nerve root compression. Spine 16:1810–1820

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garvey TA, Eismont F (1991) Diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Orthop Rev 20:595–603

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gore DR, Sepic SB, Gardner GM, Murray MP (1987) Neck pain: a longterm follow-up of 205 patients. Spine 1:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hadley MN, Sonntag VKH (1993) Cervical disc herniations. The anterior approach to symptomatic interspace pathology. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hamilton A, Balnave R, Adams R (1994) Grip strength testing reliability. J Hand Ther 7:163–170

    Google Scholar 

  29. Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey HM, Shackelford EG (1983) Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery 13:504–512

    Google Scholar 

  30. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Overholt DP (1990) Surgical management of cervical soft disc hemiation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 10:1026–1030

    Google Scholar 

  31. Highland TR, Dreisinger TE, Vie LL, Russel GS (1992) Changes in isometric strength and range of motion of the isolated cervical spine after eight weeks of clinical rehabilitation. Spine 6 [Suppl]: 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 7889:1127–1131

    Google Scholar 

  33. Huston GJ (1988) Collars and corsets. BMJ 296:276

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kendall HO, Kendall FP, Wadsworth GE (1971) Muscles, testing and function, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore London

    Google Scholar 

  35. Krusen EM (1968) Cervical pain syndromes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 7:376–382

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lunsford LD, Bissonette DJ, Jannetta PJ, Sheptak PE, Zorub DS (1980) Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. 1. Treatment of lateral cervical disc hemiation in 253 cases. Neurosurgery 53:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  37. MacDermid JC, Kramer JF, Woodbury MG, McFarlane RM, Roth JH (1994) Interrater reliability of pinch and grip strength measurements in patients with cumulative trauma disorders. J Hand Ther 7:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mannerfelt L (1966) Studies on the band in ulnar nerve paralysis. A clinical-experimental investigation in normal and anomalous innervation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 87

  39. Marzo JM, Simmons EH, Kallen F (1987) Intradural connections between adjacent cervical spinal roots. Spine 12:964–968

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Imamura T, Morimoto N (1993) Dissociated motor loss in the upper extremities. Spine 4:1964–1967

    Google Scholar 

  41. Monro P (1984) What has surgery to offer in cervical spondylosis? In: Warlow C, Garfield JC (eds) Dilemmas in the management of neurological patients. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 168–187

    Google Scholar 

  42. Murray MP, Gore DR, Gardner GM, Mollinger LA (1985) Shoulder motion and muscle strength of normal men and women in two age groups. Clin Orthop 192:268–273

    Google Scholar 

  43. Naylor JR, Mulley GP (1991) Surgical collar: a survey of their prescription and use. Br J Rheumatol 30:282–284

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nurick S (1972) The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorders associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95:101–108

    Google Scholar 

  45. Oberg T, Oberg U, Karsznia A (1994) Handgrip and finger pinch strength. Physiother Theory Pract 10:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  46. Persson LC, Moritz U (1994) Paindrawing: a quantitative and qualitative model for pain assessment in cervicobrachial pain syndrome. Pain Clin 1:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  47. Persson LC, Carlsson J, Carlsson C-A (1997) Long-lasting cervical radicular pain treated with surgery, physiotherapy or a cervical collar. A prospective randomised study. Spine 22(7)

  48. Riddle DL, Finucane SD, Rothstein JM, Walker ML (1989) Intrasession and intersession reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements taken on brain- damaged patients. Phys Ther 69:182–194

    Google Scholar 

  49. Robinson RA, Walker AE, Ferlic DC, Wieckling DK (1962) The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 8:1569–1587

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rowland LP (1992) Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: time for a controlled trial. Neurology 42:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rydevik B, Brown MD, Lundborg G (1984) Pathoanatomy and pathophysiology of nerve root compression. Spine 1:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rydevik BL, Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR, Swenson MR, Myers RR, et al (1991) Effects of acute, graded compression on spinal nerve root function and structure. An experimental study of pig cauda equina. Spine 16:487–493

    Google Scholar 

  53. Samii M, Völkening D, Sephernia A, Penkert G, Baumann H (1989) Surgical treatment of myeloradiculopathy in cervical spondylosis. A report on 438 operations. Neurosurg Rev 12:285–290

    Google Scholar 

  54. Simons FA. (1992) Cervical disc disease with radiculopathy. In: Rothman RH, Simione FA (eds) The spine, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 553–559

    Google Scholar 

  55. Spijkerman DCM, Snijders CJ, Stijnen T, Lankhorst GJ (1991) Standardization of grip strength measurements. Scand J Rehabil Med 23:203–206

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tan JC, Nordin M (1992) Role of the physical therapy in treatment of cervical disc disease. Orthop Clin North Am 23:435–449

    Google Scholar 

  57. Thorngren K-G, Werner C-O (1979) Normal grip strength. Acta Orthop Scand 50:255–259

    Google Scholar 

  58. Travell JG, Simons DG (1983) Myofascial pain and dysfunction. The trigger points manual. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 5–44

    Google Scholar 

  59. Viikari-Juntura E, Porr SM, Laasonen EM (1989) Validity of clinical tests in the diagnosis of root compression in cervical disc disease. Spine 14:253–257

    Google Scholar 

  60. White AA, Southwick WO, Deponte RJ, Gainor JW, Hardy R (1973) Relief of pain by anterior cervical spine fusion for spondylosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 55:525–534

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wlliams JL, Allen MB, Harkess JW (1968) Late results of cervical discectomy and interbody fusion: some factors influencing the results. J Bone Joint Surg 2:277–286

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, S-22185, Lund, Sweden

    L. C. G. Persson, L. Brandt & C. -A. Carlsson

  2. Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

    U. Moritz

Authors
  1. L. C. G. Persson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. U. Moritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Brandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. -A. Carlsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Persson, L.C.G., Moritz, U., Brandt, L. et al. Cervical radiculopathy: Pain, muscle weakness and sensory loss in patients with cervical radiculopathy treated with surgery, physiotherapy or cervical collar A prospective, controlled study. Eur Spine J 6, 256–266 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322448

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322448

Key words

Search

Navigation