Skip to main content
Log in

MRI after successful lumbar discectomy

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to establish the normal range of MRI findings after successful lumbar discectomy. We prospectively examined 34 consecutive patients with an excellent clinical outcome by MRI 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. All examinations included sagittal and axial spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted images before and after intravenous gadolinium-DTPA and fast SE T2-weighted images. Contrast enhancement along the surgical tract was seen in all patients 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. After 6 months minimal or no mass effect on the dural sac by epidural scar was seen. In 20% of patients there was recurrent disc herniation, with mass effect. Enhancing nerve roots were seen in 20% of patients 6 weeks postoperatively, and half of these were associated with recurrent disc herniation at the same side. None of these patients still showed nerve root enhancement 6 months after surgery. Postoperative MRI studies must be interpreted with great care since the features described in the failed back surgery syndrome are also found, to some extent, in asymptomatic postoperative patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rish BL (1984) A critique of the surgical management of lumbar disc disease in a private neurosurgical practice. Spine 9: 500–504

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weber H (1978) Lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study of prognostic factors including a controlled trial. Part I. J Oslo City Hosp 28: 36–61

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weber H (1978) Lumbar disc herniation. A prospective study of prognostic factors including a controlled trial. Part II. J Oslo City Hosp 28: 89–103

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abramovitz JN, Neff SR (1991) Lumbar disc surgery: results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 29: 301–307

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cervellini P, Curri D, Volpin L, et al (1988) Computed tomography of epidural fibrosis after discectomy: a comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Neurosurgery 23: 710–713

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hudgins PA, Clare CE (1990) Radiographic evaluation of the patient with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Cont Neurosurg 12: 23

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hueftle MG, Modic MT, Ross JS, et al (1988) Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology 167: 817–824

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bundschuh CV, Modic MT, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Bohlman H (1988) Epidural fibrosis and recurrent disk herniation in the lumbar spine: MR imaging assessment. AJNR 9:169–178, AJR 150:923–932

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frocrain L, Duvauferrier R, Husson J-L, Noel J, Ramee A, Pawlotsky Y (1989) Recurrent postoperative sciatica: evaluation with MR imaging and enhanced CT. Radiology 170: 531–533

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sotiropoulos S, Chafetz NI, Lang P, et al (1989) Differentiation between postoperative scar and recurrent disk herniation: prospective comparison of MR, CT, and contrast-enhanced CT. AJNR 10: 639–643

    Google Scholar 

  11. Firooznia H, Kricheff II, Rafii M, Golimbu C (1987) Lumbar spine after surgery: examination with intravenous contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 163: 221–226

    Google Scholar 

  12. Finnegan WJ, Fenlin JM, Marvel JP, Nardini RJ, Rothman RH (1979) Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61: 1077–1082

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braun IF, Hoffman JC Jr, Davis PC, et al (1985) Contrast enhancement in CT differentiation between recurrent disk herniation and postoperative scar: prospective study. AJNR 6: 607–612

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bundschuh CV, Stein L, Slusser JH, Schinco FP, Ladaga LE, Dillon JD (1990) Distinguishing between scar and recurrent herniated disk in postoperative patients: value of contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging. AJNR 11: 949–958

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tullberg T, Grane P, Rydberg J, Isacson J (1994) Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging one year after lumbar discectomy. Spine 19: 183–188

    Google Scholar 

  16. Montaldi S, Fankhauser H, Schnyder P, Tribolet N de (1988) Computed tomography of the postoperative intervertebral disc and lumbar spinal canal: investigation of twenty-five patients after successful operation for lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurgery 22: 1014–1022

    Google Scholar 

  17. Braun IF, Lin JP, Benjamin MV, Krichiff II (1983) Computed tomography of the asymptomatic postsurgical lumbar spine: analysis of the physiological scar. AJNR 4: 1213

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spallone A, Martino V, Floris R (1993) The role of early postoperative CT scan following surgery for herniated lumbar disc. Acta Neurochir 123: 52–56

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al (1992) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed after successful lumbar disk surgery: prospective study. Radiology 182: 59–64

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deutsch AL, Howard M, Dawson EG, et al (1993) Lumbar spine following successful surgical discectomy. Magnetic resonance imaging features and implications. Spine 18: 1054–1060

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tullberg T, Grane P, Isacson J (1994) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of 36 patients one year after lumbar disc resection. Spine 19: 176–182

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M (1986) Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 11: 601–606

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kischer WC, Shetlar MR (1979) Microvasculaturein hypertrophic scars and the effects of pressure. J Trauma 19: 757–764

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bundschuh CV (1993) Imaging of the postoperative lumbosacral spine. Neuroimag Clin North Am 3: 499–516

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, Hudkins PG, Laros GS (1987) The inflammatory effect of nucleus pulposus. A possible element in the pathogenesis of low-back pain. Spine 12: 760–764

    Google Scholar 

  26. Murray JG, Stack JP, Ennis JT, Behan M (1994) Digital substraction in contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine. AJR 162: 893–898

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Goethem, J.W.M., Van de Kelft, E., Biltjes, I.G.G.M. et al. MRI after successful lumbar discectomy. Neuroradiology 38 (Suppl 1), S90–S96 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02278130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02278130

Key words

Navigation