Skip to main content
Log in

Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy - a prospective study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is a common clinical problem. No study has examined the pattern of neurological recovery after surgical decompression. We conducted a prospective study on the pattern of neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Patients suffering from cervical spondylotic myelopathy and requiring surgical decompression from January 1995 to December 2000 were prospectively included. Upper limbs, lower limbs and sphincter functions were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Assessment was done before the operation, at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and then yearly after surgery. Results were analysed with the t-test. Differences with P-values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. Fifty-five patients were included. The average follow-up period was 53 months. Thirty-nine patients (71%) had neurological improvement after the operation with a mean recovery rate of 55%. The JOA score improved after surgery, reaching statistical significance at 3 months and a plateau at 6 months. Thirty-six patients (65%) had improvement of upper limb function. Twenty-four patients (44%) had improvement of lower limb function. Eleven patients (20%) had improvement of sphincter function. The recovery rate of upper limb function was 37%, of lower limb function was 23% and of sphincter function was 17%. Surgical decompression worked well in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Seventy-one percent of patients had neurological improvement after the operation. The neurological recovery reached a plateau at 6 months after the operation. The upper limb function had the best recovery, followed by lower limb and sphincter functions.

Résumé

Les myélopathies cervicales sont un problème courant. Aucune étude n’a examiné la récupération neurologique après décompression chirurgicale. Nous avons conduit une étude prospective sur ce sujet, chez des patients ayant bénéficié d’une décompression pour myélopathie cervicale. Les patients opérés entre janvier 1995 et décembre 2000 ont été inclus dans cette étude. Les fonctions des membres supérieurs, des membres inférieurs et les fonctions sphinctériennes ont été évaluées selon le score de la JOA (Association Japonaise d’Orthopédie). L’évaluation a été réalisée avant l’opération, une semaine, deux semaines, un mois, trois mois, six mois, un an et chaque année après l’intervention chirurgicale. Les résultats ont été analysés selon le P test et en appréciant ensuite les résultats statistiquement ou non statistiquement significatifs. Cinquante-cinq patients ont été inclus. Le suivi moyen a été de 53 mois, 39 patients (71%) ont montré une amélioration neurologique après l’intervention avec un taux de récupération complète de 55%. Le score de la JOA a été amélioré à 3 mois avec un plateau de récupération à 6 mois. Trente-six patients (65%) ont vu une amélioration au niveau des fonctions du membre supérieur, 24 (44%) au niveau des membres inférieurs, 11 (5%) au niveau des fonctions sphinctériennes. Le taux de récupération au niveau des membres supérieurs a été de 37%, pour les membres inférieurs de 23% et pour les fonctions sphinctériennes de 17%. La décompression chirurgicale des myélopathies cervicales est une opération intéressante; 71% des patients ont vu une amélioration neurologique après l’intervention. Cette récupération atteint un plateau six mois après l’intervention. La récupération des membres supérieurs est la plus importante, suivie de la récupération des membres inférieurs puis de la récupération sphinctérienne. Mots clés : myélopathie cervicale, récupération neurologique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernard TN Jr, Whitecloud TS (1987) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. Anterior decompression and stabilization with autologenous fibula strut graft. Clin orthop 221:149–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carol MP, Ducker TB (1998) Cervical spondylitic myelopathies: Surgical treatment. J spinal disorders 1:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen CJ, Lyu RK, Lee ST, Wong YC, Wang LJ (2001) Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Prediction of prognosis with type of intensity. Neuroradiology 221:789–794

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung SS, Lee SC, Chung KH (2002) Factors affecting the surgical results of expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Int Orthop 26:334–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiles BW, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR (1999) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 44:762–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards CC, Heller JG, Silcox DH (2000) T-saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy-Clinical and radiological outcome. Spine 25:1788–1794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Engsberg JR, Laurysseen C, Ross SA, Hollman JH, Walker D, Wippold FJ (2003) Spasticity, trength, and gait changes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy-A case report. Spine 28:E136–E139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernyhough JC, White JI, LaRocca H (1991) Fusion rates in multi-level cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients. Spine 16:S561–S564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fessler RG, Steck JC, Giovanini MA (1998) Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 43:257–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujiwara K, Yonenobu K, Ebara S, Yamashita K, Ono K (1989) The prognosis of surgery for cervical decompression myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 81:393–398

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y, Hirano T, Watanabe K, Yamazaki A (2002) Effects of surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients >70 years of age: A retrospective comparative study. J Spinal Disorder Tech 15:458–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herkowitz HN (1989) The surgical management of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. Clin Orthop 239:94–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Houten JK, Cooper PR (2003) Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery 52:1081–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Ando M, Yamada H, Yoshida M (2002) Relationships between sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and morphology of the spinal cord and clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with expansive laminoplasty. J Spinal Disorder Tech 15:391–397

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pavlov P (2003) Anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 12(Suppl 2):S188–S194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prabhu K, Babu KS, Bot SS, Chacko AG (2005) Rapid opening and closing of the hand as a measure of early neurologic recovery in the upper extremity after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:105–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis J, Ducker TB (2000) Outcomes of patients treated for cervical myelopathy-A prospective, multicentre study with independent clinical review. Spine 25:670–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (2003) Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 28:1258–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Teramoto T, Ohmori K, Takatsu T, Inoue H, Ishida Y, Suzuki K (1994) A long-term results of anterior cervical spondylodesis. Neurosurgery 35:64–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto S, Yonenobu K (2001) Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy-A long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 13:1443–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamazaki T, Yanaka K, Sato H, Uemura K, Tsukada A, Nose T (2003) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differencec. Neurosurgery 52:122–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K (1992) Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy: A comparative study of results in multisegment cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 17:1281–1284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. M. C. Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheung, W.Y., Arvinte, D., Wong, Y.W. et al. Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy - a prospective study. International Orthopaedics (SICO 32, 273–278 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0315-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0315-4

Keywords

Navigation