Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of platelet-rich plasma on the anterior fusion in spinal injuries: a qualitative and quantitative analysis using computer tomography

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were monitored by performing a controlled cohort study of patients undergoing an anterior spinal fusion. One group was treated with the addition of PRP. The growth factors contained within the blood platelets are known to play an important role in the new formation of bone following fractures or the implantation of bone grafts. But the results following the use of PRP in spinal fusion are not yet published.

Method

The study involved a group of 15 patients, who had suffered an injury of the thoracic or lumbar spine and had undergone an anterior fusion using cages. They had received an additional posterior stabilisation and/or anterior implants as well as bone graft combined with PRP. A control group made up of 20 patients received a similar treatment, but without the addition of PRP. A CT scan was performed of all patients during follow-up examinations. The area on the left side of the cage, where the bone graft with or without PRP had been applied, was analysed and the patients were divided into three classes, depending upon the rate of fusion: complete fusion, incomplete fusion and no/minimal ossification. In cases which were classified as complete or incomplete ossification, an additional CT volumetry and densitometry was performed. The patient-referred outcome was documented using the VAS spinal score.

Results

In both groups, 40% of the patients had reached a complete fusion in the CT scans. No or minimal fusion was documented in 20% of the PRP group and 30% of the control group. When measuring the density within the newly formed bone mass, both groups showed nearly identical percentages with a density of over 100 Hounsfield units (HU). The share of bone with a density of over +500 HU was 29.33% in the PRP group and 23.57% in the control group. Within the partition of over +100 HU, the absolute density was significantly higher in the PRP group (639.7 vs. 514.2 HU). Similar results could be shown within the partition of over +500 HU (930.7 vs. 846 HU). The VAS scores showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion

The additional application of autologous PRP involves very little risk for the patients. The study implies that the use of PRP provides a faster fusion and higher density values within the fusion mass. A clear advancement in spinal fusion in terms of a clinical benefit remains questionable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20:1055–1060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baylink DJ, Finkelman RD, Mohan S (1993) Growth factors to stimulate bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 8:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blattert TR, Delling G, Dalal PS et al (2002) Successful transpedicular lumbar fusion by means of a composite of osteogenic protein-1 (rhBMP-7) and hydroxyapatite carrier. Spine 27:2697–2705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bose B, Balzarini MA (2003) Bone graft gel: autologous growth factors used with autograft bone for lumbar spine fusions. Adv Ther 19(4):170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burkus JK, Gornet MF, Dickman CA et al (2002) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2 tapered interbody cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:337–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Canalis E, McCarthy TL, Centrella M (1989) Effects of platelet-derived growth factor on bone formation in vitro. J Cell Physiol 140:530–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Anekstein Y et al (2005) Platelet gel (AGF) fails to increase fusion rates in instrumented posterolateral fusions. Spine 30:243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook SD, Patron LP, Christakis PM et al (2004) Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 29:1118–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Burkus KJ et al (2006) Clinical outcomes and fusion success at 2 years of single-level instrumented posterolateral fusions with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/Compression resistant matix versus iliac crest bone graft. Spine 31:2534–2539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas-Akinwande AC, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J et al (2006) Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware. Radiographics 26:97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Everts PAM, Hoffmann J, Weibrich C et al (2006) Differences in platelet growth factor release and leucocyte kinetics during autologous platelet gel formation. Transfus Med 16:363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT et al (2003) Do autologous growth factors enhance transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion? Eur Spine J 12:400–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenis LG, Banco RJ, Kwon B (2006) A prospective study of autologous growth factors (AGF) in lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L et al (2001) Development and validation of the visual analogue scale (VAS) spine score. Unfallchirurg 104:488–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lieberman JR, Daluiski A, Einhorn TA (2002) The role of growth factors in the repair of bone: biology and clinical applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1032–1044

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowery GL, Kulkarni S, Pennisi AE (1999) Use of autologous growth factors in lumbar spinal fusion. Bone 25(2):Suppl 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Boden SD (2000) Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes. Eur Spine J 9(Suppl 1):119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marlovits S, Mousavi M, Gaebler C et al (2004) A new simplified technique for producing platelet-rich plasma: a short technical note. Eur Spine J 13(Suppl 1):102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marx RE (2004) Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:489–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moll R, Schindler G, Weckbach A (2002) Evaluation of ventral stabilization techniques for thoracolumbar fractures by helical computer tomography. Fortschr Roentgenstr 174:880–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrison RH, Thierolf A, Weckbach A (2007) Volumetric changes of iliac crest autografts used to reconstruct the anterior column in thoracolumbar fractures: a follow-up using CT scans. Spine 32:3030–3035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Norton MR, Gamble C (2001) Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implant Res 12:79–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah RR, Mohammed S, Saifuddin A et al (2003) Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation. Eur Spine J 12:378–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Slater M, Patava J, Kingham K et al (1995) Involvement of platelets in stimulating osteogenic activity. J Orthop Res 13:655–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Spruit M, Meijers H, Obradov M et al (2004) CT density measurement of bone graft within an intervertebral lumbar cage. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:232–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Purchio AF et al (1995) Enhancement of bone ingrowth by transforming growth factor-beta. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1135–1147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Togawa D, Bauer TW, Brantigan JW et al (2003) Bone graft incorporation in radigraphically successful human intervertebral body fusion cages. Spine 26:2744–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weiner BK, Walker M (2003) Efficacy of autologous growth factors in lumbar intertransverse fusions. Spine 28:1968–1971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK (2005) CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. Am J Neuroradiol 26:2057–2066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the Department of Radiology at the University Hospital Wuerzburg for their cooperation. No funds were received in support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik K. Hartmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartmann, E.K., Heintel, T., Morrison, R.H. et al. Influence of platelet-rich plasma on the anterior fusion in spinal injuries: a qualitative and quantitative analysis using computer tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 909–914 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-1015-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-1015-5

Keywords

Navigation