Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative measurement of pharynx/esophagus retraction during anterior cervical surgery. Part I: pressure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporary dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) is common. However, its mechanism is poorly understood. Pressure induced by retractor blades onto pharynx/esophagus were measured intraoperatively in order to gain more information regarding traumatization of the pharynx/esophagus wall. Thirty-one patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative disc disease. An online pressure transducer was applied to the rear side of the medial retractor blade (epi-esophageal-pressure, epi-P) and a cylindric, inflatable transducer was preoperatively inserted into the pharynx/esophagus under fluoroscopic guidance at the level to be operated on (endo-esophageal-pressure, endo-P). Pressure values were recorded continuously during the operation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and endotracheal cuff pressure (ETCP) were recorded additionally. An in vitro model was developed in order to analyze the impact of the retractor blade design onto the epi-esophageal-pressure. Mean epi-P before and following adequate retractor opening for exposure of the disc space was 58.3 and 92.7 mmHg. Thirty, 60 and 90 min later the epi-P decreased to 79, 70 and 66%, respectively. Mean basal endo-P was 9.8 mmHg and increased to 20.6 mmHg after retractor placement. Thirty, 60 and 90 min later the endo-P decreased to 80, 71 and 62%, respectively. The mean MAP was 76 mmHg and the ECTP was adjusted to 25 mmHg during the procedures. In the in vitro model retraction pressure correlated inversely with the contact area between visceral wall and retractor blade. During ACDF the retraction pressure onto the pharyngeal/esophageal wall exceeds MAP and even more the mucosal perfusion pressure of 25 mmHg. Over time the pharynx/esophageal wall adapts to the applied pressure induced by the retractor blade. The contact area between them influences the retraction pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bazaz M, Lee M, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine 27:2453–2458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bose B (1998) Anterior cervical fusion using Caspar plating: analysis of results and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 49:25–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Puehringer F (1999) Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anaesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anaesthesiology 91:1661–1665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards CC, Karpitskaya Y, Cha C, Heller JG, Lauryssen C, Yoon ST, Riew KD (2004) Accurate identification of adverse outcomes after cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 86:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee SK, Lee GY, Wong GT (2004) Prolonged and severe dysphagia following anterior cervical surgery. J Clin Neurosci 11:424–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratnaraj J, Todorov A, McHugh T, Cheng MA, Lauryssen C (2002) Effects of decreasing endotracheal tube cuff pressures during neck retraction for anterior cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg 97:176–179

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiebler TH, Schmidt W (1987) Lehrbuch der Anatomie des Menschen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart M, Johnston RA, Steward I (1995) Swallowing performance following anterior cervical spine surgery. Br J Neurosurg 9:605–609

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Styf JR, Willen J (1998) The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior lumbar spine surgery in humans. Spine 23:354–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor H, McGregor A, Medhi-Zadeh S, Richards S, Kahn N, Zadeh JA, Hughes S (2002) The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 27:2758–2762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Winslow CP, Winslow TJ, Wax MK (2001) Dysphonia and dysphagia following the anterior approach to the cervical spine. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:51–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Heese.

Additional information

Part II of this article can be found under http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0070-7

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heese, O., Schröder, F., Westphal, M. et al. Intraoperative measurement of pharynx/esophagus retraction during anterior cervical surgery. Part I: pressure. Eur Spine J 15, 1833–1837 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0069-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0069-0

Keywords

Navigation