Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Nerve root decompression without fusion in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: long-term results of Gill’s procedure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nerve root decompression with instrumented fusion is currently most commonly performed in the treatment of patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. The relationship between successful fusion and clinical outcome remains controversial, thereby questioning the necessity of fusion. Nerve root decompression without fusion, i.e. Gill’s procedure, might be a less invasive surgical alternative with comparable clinical outcome. The objective of this study is to compare the long-term results of Gills’s procedure with data from literature on decompression with fusion, and, moreover, to determine if a future randomised trial is legitimate. We retrospectively reviewed the long-term results of Gill’s procedure in patients with grade I or II spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. All patients suffered from leg pain with or without low back pain. No patient had low back pain alone. In 17 patients a bilateral and in 25 patients a unilateral Gill’s procedures were performed. The patients were evaluated at three follow-up moments. On moment 1, 38 patients were clinically examined on their last out-patient control (mean follow-up 11 months). On moment 2, 34 patients were interviewed by telephone (mean follow-up 4.4 years). The final long-term follow-up moment 3 (mean follow-up 10.5 years) included a mailed patient-satisfaction questionnaire of 31 patients (response rate 74%). No surgical complication occurred. Ten of the 42 patients were reoperated because of persistent or recurrent radicular pain (mean time interval 2.9 years). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a disease-free survival rate of 79% at 5 years and 72% at 10 years after the index operation. On the three follow-up moments, the improvement of leg pain was 92, 97 and 88%, respectively. The final long-term follow-up showed 71% good result in terms of patient satisfaction. The Gill’s procedure is a less invasive surgical technique in the treatment of patients with leg pain due to low-grade spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. This technique can be considered as an alternative to instrumented fusion in selected cases. Preoperative instability, discectomy at the affected level and neuroforaminal nerve root compression seem to be negative influencing factors, increasing the risk for secondary instrumented surgery. The results of this study justify a randomised trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baldwin N (1996) Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. In: Menezes A (ed) Principles of spinal surgery, McGraw-Hill, New York pp 681–703

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett G (1996) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. In: Youmans J (ed) Neurological surgery, 4th edn, Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2416–2431

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boxall D, Bradford DS, Winter RB, Moe JH (1979) Management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61:479–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buck JE (1970) Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52:432–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlsson AM (1983) Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16:87–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carragee EJ (1997) Single-level posterolateral arthrodesis, with or without posterior decompression, for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1175–1180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crock HV (1981) Normal and pathological anatomy of the lumbar spinal nerve root canals. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63B:487–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis IS, Bailey RW (1976) Spondylolisthesis: indications for lumbar nerve root decompression and operative technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:129–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Loubresse CG, Bon T, Deburge A, Lassale B, Benoit M (1996) Posterolateral fusion for radicular pain in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 323:194–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ, Zdeblick TA (1998) Posterolateral fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: analysis of fusion rate and clinical results. J Spinal Disord 11:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Edelson JG, Nathan H (1986) Nerve root compression in spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:596–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekman P, Moller H, Hedlund R (2005) The long-term effect of posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled study. Spine J 5:36–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fraser RD (1995) Interbody, posterior, and combined lumbar fusions. Spine 20:167S–177S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ, Yuan HA, Lubicky JP (1984) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:699–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A (2003) Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12:178–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gill GG, White HL (1965) Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis without spine fusion. A long term follow-up of operated cases. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 85:5–99

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gill GG, Manning JG, White HL (1955) Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis without spine fusion: excision of the loose lamina with decompression of the nerve roots. J Bone Joint Surg Br 37-A:493–520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanley EN Jr (1995) The indications for lumbar spinal fusion with and without instrumentation. Spine 20:143S–153S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanley EN Jr, Levy JA (1989) Surgical treatment of isthmic lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Analysis of variables influencing results. Spine 14:48–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jinkins JR, Matthes JC, Sener RN, Venkatappan S, Rauch R (1992) Spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and associated nerve root entrapment in the lumbosacral spine: MR evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:799–803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson LP, Nasca RJ, Dunham WK (1988) Surgical management of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 13:93–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim NH, Lee JW (1999) Anterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. A comparison of clinical results. Spine 24:812–816; discussion 817

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knight M, Goswami A (2003) Management of isthmic spondylolisthesis with posterolateral endoscopic foraminal decompression. Spine 28:573–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. La Rosa G, Conti A, Cacciola F, Cardali S, La Torre D, Gambadauro NM, Tomasello F (2003) Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion? J Neurosurg 99:143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Madan S, Boeree NR (2002) Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 27:1536–1542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Marmor L, Bechtol C (1961) Spondylolisthesis. Complete slip following the Gill’s procedure. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 43:1068–1069

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meyerding HW (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis–a prospective randomized study: part 2. Spine 25:1716–1721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis–a prospective randomized study: part 1. Spine 25:1711–1715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Moller H, Sundin A, Hedlund R (2000) Symptoms, signs, and functional disability in adult spondylolisthesis. Spine 25:683–689; discussion 690

    Google Scholar 

  32. Osterman K, Lindholm TS, Laurent LE (1976) Late results of removal of the loose posterior element (Gill’s operation) in the treatment of lytic lumbar spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:121–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pihlajamaki H, Bostman O, Ruuskanen M, Myllynen P, Kinnunen J, Karaharju E (1996) Posterolateral lumbosacral fusion with transpedicular fixation: 63 consecutive cases followed for 4 (2–6) years. Acta Orthop Scand 67:63–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sairyo K, Katoh S, Sakamaki T, Komatsubara S, Yasui N (2003) A new endoscopic technique to decompress lumbar nerve roots affected by spondylolysis. Technical note. J Neurosurg 98:290–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saraste H (1993) Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251:84–86

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schnee CL, Freese A, Ansell LV (1997) Outcome analysis for adults with spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral fusion and transpedicular screw fixation. J Neurosurg 86:56–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Hyvarinen H, Schlenzka D, Poussa M (1990) Severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. A long-term review of fusion in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:259–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Soini J, Laine T, Pohjolainen T, Hurri H, Alaranta H (1993) Spondylodesis augmented by transpedicular fixation in the treatment of olisthetic and degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 297:111–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Spruit M, Pavlov PW, Leitao J, De Kleuver M, Anderson PG, Den Boer F (2002) Posterior reduction and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: short-term radiological and functional outcome. Eur Spine J 11:428–433; discussion 434

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tonino A, van der Werf G (1994) Direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. 10-year follow-up of 12 previously reported cases. Acta Orthop Scand 65:91–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Weiner BK, McCulloch JA (1996) Microdecompression without fusion for radiculopathy associated with lytic spondylolisthesis [see comments]. J Neurosurg 85:582–585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wiltse LL, Widell EH Jr, Jackson DW (1975) Fatigue fracture: the basic lesion is inthmic spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:17–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wiltse LL, Newman PH, Macnab I (1976) Classification of spondylolisis and spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:23–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yahiro MA (1994) Comprehensive literature review. Pedicle screw fixation devices. Spine 19:2274S–2278S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B (2001) Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 26:2375–2380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leiden University Medical Center, Neurosurgery, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Mark Arts, Willem Pondaag, Wilco Peul & Raph Thomeer

  2. Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands

    Mark Arts & Wilco Peul

Authors
  1. Mark Arts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Willem Pondaag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wilco Peul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Raph Thomeer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Arts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arts, M., Pondaag, W., Peul, W. et al. Nerve root decompression without fusion in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: long-term results of Gill’s procedure. Eur Spine J 15, 1455–1463 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0115-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0115-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation