Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Implantation of amniotic membrane to reduce postlaminectomy epidural adhesions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postlaminectomy epidural adhesion is implicated as a main cause of “failed back surgery syndrome” and associated with increased risk of complications during revision surgery. Various materials acting as mechanical barriers to reduce fibroblasts infiltration into epidural space have met with limited success. In present research, amniotic membrane (AM) was studied to investigate its effects on reducing epidural scar adhesion after laminectomy in a canine model. Laminectomy sites were created at L-1, L-3, L-5, and L-7 levels in 24 adult mongrel dogs. Freeze dried AM (FAM), cross-linked AM (CAM), and autologous free fat (AFF) were implanted, respectively, at a randomly assigned site in each dog with the remaining untreated site serving as internal control. The animals were sacrificed at 1, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Then, gross pathologic observation including scar amount and adhesion tenacity, qualitative histology evaluation, and quantitative histology analysis were compared. Gross observation demonstrated that scar amount and adhesion tenacity of CAM group were significantly lower in comparison with those of FAM and non-treatment groups. A white, slightly vascularized CAM layer covered the dura mater without tenacious scar adhesion. The histology analysis also indicated reduced fibroblasts infiltration and consequent epidural fibrosis, which were similar to the results of AFF group. In conclusion, the CAM is effective in reducing epidural fibrosis and scar adhesion after laminectomy in canine model. It is a promising biomaterial for future clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annertz M, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B, Holtas S (1995) No relationship between epidural fibrosis and sciatica in the lumbar postdiscectomy syndrome. Spine 20(4):449–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Fenk-Mayer A, Eerulkar J, Emerson JW (2006) Treatment of symptomatic adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty by using the prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow up. J Neurosurg Spine 4(2):91–97. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coskun E, Süzer T, Topuz O, Zencir M, Pakdemirli E, Tahta K (2000) Relationships between epidural fibrosis, pain, disability, and psychological factors after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 9(3):218–223. doi:10.1007/s005860000144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Duggal N, Mendiondo I, Pares HR, Jhawar BS, Das K, Kenny KJ, Dickman CA (2004) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: an outcome analysis. Neurosurgery 54(3):636–643. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000108423.87889.9E

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Einhaus SL, Robertson JT, Dohan FC Jr, Wujek JR, Ahmad S (1997) Reduction of peridural fibrosis after lumbar laminotomy and discectomy in dogs by a resorbable gel (ADCON-L). Spine 22(13):1440–1446. doi:10.1097/00007632-199707010-00003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischgrund JS (2000) Perspectives on modern orthopaedics: use of Adcon-L for epidural scar prevention. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8(6):339–343

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fritsch EW, Heisel J, Rupp S (1996) The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: a report of 182 operative treatments. Spine 21(5):626–633. doi:10.1097/00007632-199603010-00017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Görgülü A, Simşek O, Cobanoğlu S, Imer M, Parsak T (2004) The effect of epidural free fat graft on the outcome of lumbar disc surgery. Neurosurg Rev 27(3):181–184. doi:10.1007/s10143-003-0310-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hasegawa T, Mizoguchi M, Haruna K, Mizuno Y, Muramatsu S, Suga Y, Ogawa H, Ikeda S (2007) Amnia for intractable skin ulcers with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: report of three cases. J Dermatol 34(5):328–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hieb LD, Stevens DL (2001) Spontaneous postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks following application of anti-adhesion barrier gel: case report and review of the literature. Spine 26(7):748–751. doi:10.1097/00007632-200104010-00009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Imran Y, Halim Y (2005) Acute cauda equina syndrome secondary to free fat graft following spinal decompression. Singapore Med J 46(1):25–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacob A, Faddis BT, Chole RA (2002) MeroGel hyaluronic acid sinonasal implants: osteogenic implications. Laryngoscope 112(1):37–42. doi:10.1097/00005537-200201000-00007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Ohmori K, Kimura T, Tsuji H, Matsui H (2001) The fate of autogenous free-fat grafts after posterior lumbar surgery: Part 2. Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic studies in repeated surgery cases. Spine 26(20):2264–2270. doi:10.1097/00007632-200110150-00019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kato T, Haro H, Komori H, Shinomiya K (2005) Evaluation of hyaluronic acid sheet for the prevention of postlaminectomy adhesions. Spine J 5(5):479–488. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kubo M, Sonoda Y, Muramatsu R, Usui M (2001) Immunogenicity of human amniotic membrane in experimental xenotransplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42(7):1539–1546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar TR, Shanmugasundaram N, Babu M (2003) Biocompatible collagen scaffolds from a human amniotic membrane: physicochemical and in vitro culture characteristics. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 14(7):689–706. doi:10.1163/156856203322274941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. LaRocca H, MacNab I (1974) The laminectomy membrane: studies in its evolution, characteristics, effects and prophylaxis in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56B(3):545–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee CH, Cho DS, Jin SC, Kim SH, Park DB (2007) Usefulness of silicone elastomer sheet as another option of adhesion preventive material during craniectomies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109(8):667–671. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu S, Boutrand JP, Bittoun J, Tadie M (2002) A collagen-based sealant to prevent in vivo reformation of epidural scar adhesions in an adult rat laminectomy model. J Neurosurg 97(1)(Suppl):69–74

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacKay MA, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT, Hecht B, Schwartz M (1995) The effect of interposition membrane on the outcome of lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. Spine 20(16):1793–1796

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mayer PJ, Jacobsen FS (1989) Cauda equina syndrome after surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with application of free autogenous fat graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71(7):1090–1093

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyamoto K, Masuda K, Inoue N, Okuma M, Muehleman C, An HS (2006) Anti-adhesion properties of a thrombin-based hemostatic gelatin in a canine laminectomy model: a biomechanical, biochemical, and histologic study. Spine 31(4):E91–E97. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000199902.80607.ce

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nygaard QP, Jacobsen EA, Solberg T, Kloster R, Dullerud R (1999) Nerve root signs on postoperative lumbar MR imaging. A prospective cohort study with contrast enhanced MRI in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients one year after microdiscectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(6):619–622. doi:10.1007/s007010050351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Prusick VR, Lint DS, Bruder WJ (1988) Cauda equina syndrome as a complication of free epidural fat-grafting: a report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(8):1256–1258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rennekampff HO, Dohrmann P, Fory R, Fändrich F (1994) Evaluation of amniotic membrane as adhesions prophylaxis in a novel surgical gastroschisis mode. J Invest Surg 7(3):187–193. doi:10.3109/08941939409018285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson JT (1996) Role of peridural fibrosis in the failed back: a review. Eur Spine J 5(Suppl 1):S2–S6. doi:10.1007/BF00298565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC, Petrie JL, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, de Tribolet N (1996) Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L European Study Group. Neurosurgery 38(4):855–861. doi:10.1097/00006123-199604000-00053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabuncuoğlu H, Bavbek M, Sabuncuoğlu B, Gadelha E, Köse K, Preul M (2007) Attenuation of postlaminectomy epidural fibrosis with monoclonal antibodies against intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and CD-18. Spine J 7(4):459–465. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shih HN, Fang JF, Chen JH, Yang CL, Chen YH, Sung TH, Shih LY (2004) Reduction in experimental peridural adhesion with the use of a crosslinked hyaluronate/collagen membrane. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 71(2):421–428. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tatsui CE, Martinez G, Li X, Pattany P, Levi AD (2006) Evaluation of DuraGen in preventing peridural fibrosis in rabbits. J Neurosurg Spine 4(1):51–59. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.1.51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tosi GM, Massaro-Giordano M, Caporossi A, Toti P (2005) Amniotic membrane transplantation in ocular surface disorders. J Cell Physiol 202(3):849–851. doi:10.1002/jcp.20181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Von Versen-Höynck F, Syring C, Bachmann S, Möller DE (2004) The influence of different preservation and sterilisation steps on the histological properties of amnion allografts-light and scanning electron microscopic studies. Cell Tissue Bank 5(1):45–56. doi:10.1023/B:CATB.0000022276.47180.96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Welch WC, Thomas KA, Cornwall GB, Gerszten PC, Toth JM, Nemoto EM, Turner AS (2002) Use of polylactide resorbable film as an adhesion barrier. J Neurosurg 97(4)(Suppl):413–422

    Google Scholar 

  34. Winkelmüller M, Winkelmüller W (1996) Long-term effects of continuous intrathecal opioid treatment in chronic pain of nonmalignant etiology. J Neurosurg 85(3):458–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zafar M, Saeed S, Kant B, Murtaza B, Dar MF, Khan NA (2007) Use of amnion in vaginoplasty for vaginal atresia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 17(2):107–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zohar Y, Talmi YP, Finkelstein Y, Shvili Y, Sadov R, Laurian N (1987) Use of human amniotic membrane in otolaryngologic practice. Laryngoscope 97(8Pt1):978–980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zou X, Li H, Egund N, Lind M, Bünger C (2004) Inhibition of spinal fusion by use of a tissue ingrowth inhibitor. Eur Spine J 13(2):157–163. doi:10.1007/s00586-003-0645-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Xi-jing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, 710032, Xi’an, China

    Huiren Tao & Hongbin Fan

Authors
  1. Huiren Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongbin Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongbin Fan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, H., Fan, H. Implantation of amniotic membrane to reduce postlaminectomy epidural adhesions. Eur Spine J 18, 1202–1212 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1013-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation