Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The second, internet-based multicenter study (MCSII) of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) is a representative patient collection of acute traumatic thoracolumbar (T1–L5) injuries. The MCSII results are an update of those obtained with the first multicenter study (MCSI) more than a decade ago. The aim of the study was to assess and bring into focus: the (1) epidemiologic data, (2) surgical and radiological outcome, and (3) 2-year follow-up (FU) results of these injuries. According to the Magerl/AO classification, there were 424 (57.8%) compression fractures (A type), 178 (24.3%) distractions injuries (B type), and 131 (17.9%) rotational injuries (C type). B and C type injuries carried a higher risk for neurological deficits, concomitant injuries, and multiple vertebral fractures. The level of injury was located at the thoracolumbar junction (T11–L2) in 67.0% of the case. 380 (51.8%) patients were operated on by posterior stabilization and instrumentation alone (POSTERIOR), 34 (4.6%) had an anterior procedure (ANTERIOR), and 319 (43.5%) patients were treated with combined posteroanterior surgery (COMBINED). 65% of patients with thoracic (T1–T10) and 57% with lumbar spinal (L3–L5) injuries were treated with a single posterior approach (POSTERIOR). 47% of the patients with thoracolumbar junction (T11–L2) injuries were either operated from posterior or with a combined posterior–anterior surgery (COMBINED) each. Short angular stable implant systems have replaced conventional non-angular stable instrumentation systems to a large extent. The posttraumatic deformity was restored best with COMBINED surgery. T-spine injuries were accompanied by a higher number and more severe neurologic deficits than TL junction or L-spine injuries. At the same time T-spine injuries showed less potential for neurologic recovery especially in paraplegic (Frankel/AISA A) patients. 5% of all patients required revision surgery for perioperative complications. Follow-up data of 558 (76.1%) patients were available and collected during a 30-month period from 1 January 2004 until 31 May 2006. On average, a posterior implant removal was carried out in a total of 382 COMBINED and POSTERIOR patients 12 months after the initial surgery. On average, the rehabilitation process required 3–4 weeks of inpatient treatment, followed by another 4 months of outpatient therapy and was significantly shorter when compared with MCSI in the mid-1990s. From the time of injury until FU, 80 (60.6%) of 132 patients with initial neurological deficits improved at least one grade on the Frankel/ASIA Scale; 8 (1.3%) patients deteriorated. A higher recovery rate was observed for incomplete neurological injuries (73%) than complete neurological injuries (44%). Different surgical approaches did not have a significant influence on the neurologic recovery until FU. Nevertheless, neurological deficits are the most important factors for the functional outcome and prognosis of TL spinal injuries. POSTERIOR patients had a better functional and subjective outcome at FU than COMBINED patients. However, the posttraumatic radiological deformity was best corrected in COMBINED patients and showed significantly less residual kyphotic deformity (biseg GDW −3.8° COMBINED vs. −6.1° POSTERIOR) at FU (p = 0.005). The sagittal spinal alignment was better maintained when using vertebral body replacement implants (cages) in comparison to iliac strut grafts. Additional anterior plate systems did not have a significant influence on the radiological FU results. In conclusion, comprehensive data of a large patient population with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries has been obtained and analyzed with this prospective internet-based multicenter study. Thus, updated results and the clinical outcome of the current operative treatment strategies in participating German and Austrian trauma centers have been presented. Nevertheless, it was not possible to answer all remaining questions to contradictory findings of the subjective, clinical outcome and corresponding radiological findings between different surgical subgroups. Randomized-controlled long-term investigations seem mandatory and the next step in future clinical research of Spine Study Group of the German Trauma Society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Comorbidities were graded according to an anatomical injury scale (Abbreviate Injury Scale = AIS) [2] from 0, meaning “no injury” up to 5, meaning “critical injury, survival unlikely”.

References

  1. Agus H, Kayali C, Arslantas M (2005) Nonoperative treatment of burst-type thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: clinical and radiological results of 29 patients. Eur Spine J 14(6):536–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Association for Automotive Medicine (1980) Die abgekürzte Verletzungsskala (AIS). Revidierte Fassung ed. Morton Grove, IL 60053, USA

  3. American Spinal Injury Association (1992) ASIA classification: Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injuries Association, Chicago

  4. Atlas SW, Regenbogen V, Rogers LF, Kim KS (1986) The radiographic characterization of burst fractures of the spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147(3):575–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon WJ, Long WB (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Been HD, Bouma GJ (1999) Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(4):349–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Beisse R, Muckley T, Schmidt MH, Hauschild M, Buhren V (2005) Surgical technique and results of endoscopic anterior spinal canal decompression. J Neurosurg Spine 2(2):128–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Beisse R, Potulski M, Bühren V (1999) Thorakoskopisch gesteuerte ventrale Plattenspondylodese bei Frakturen der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule. Operat Orthop Traumatol 11(1):54–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bence T, Schreiber U, Grupp T, Steinhauser E, Mittelmeier W (2007) Two column lesions in the thoracolumbar junction: anterior, posterior or combined approach? A comparative biomechanical in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J 16(6):813–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bensch FV, Koivikko MP, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK (2006) The incidence and distribution of burst fractures. Emerg Radiol 12(3):124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boerger TO, Limb D, Dickson RA (2000) Does ‘canal clearance’ affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fractures? J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(5):629–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bohlman HH, Kirkpatrick JS, Delamarter RB, Leventhal M (1994) Anterior decompression for late pain and paralysis after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res (300):24–29

  13. Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 25(24):3100–3103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bradford DS, McBride GG (1987) Surgical management of thoracolumbar spine fractures with incomplete neurologic deficits. Clin Orthop (218):201–216

  15. Buhren V, Beisse R, Potulski M (1997) Minimally invasive ventral spondylodesis in injuries to the thoracic and lumbar spine. Chirurg 68(11):1076–1084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burney RE, Maio RF, Maynard F, Karunas R (1993) Incidence, characteristics, and outcome of spinal cord injury at trauma centers in North America. Arch Surg 128(5):596–599

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson GD, Gorden CD, Oliff HS, Pillai JJ, LaManna JC (2003) Sustained spinal cord compression: part I: time-dependent effect on long-term pathophysiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(1):86–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clohisy JC, Akbarnia BA, Bucholz RD, Burkus JK, Backer RJ (1992) Neurologic recovery associated with anterior decompression of spine fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (T12–L1). Spine 17(8 Suppl):S325–S330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Croce MA, Bee TK, Pritchard E, Miller PR, Fabian TC (2001) Does optimal timing for spine fracture fixation exist? Ann Surg 233(6):851–858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai LY, Wang XY, Jiang LS (2007) Neurologic recovery from thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it predicted by the amount of initial canal encroachment and kyphotic deformity? Surg Neurol 67(3):232–237

    Google Scholar 

  21. Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA, Whitehill R et al (1995) Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg 83(6):977–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Defino HL, Rodriguez-Fuentes AE (1998) Treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine by combined anteroposterior fixation using the Harms method. Eur Spine J 7(3):187–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dickman CA, Yahiro MA, Lu HT, Melkerson MN (1994) Surgical treatment alternatives for fixation of unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A meta-analysis. Spine 19(20 Suppl):2266S–2273S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Raque GH, Zhang YP, Shields CB (1999) The influence of spinal canal narrowing and timing of decompression on neurologic recovery after spinal cord contusion in a rat model. Spine 24(16):1623–1633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dunn HK (1984) Anterior stabilization of thoracolumbar injuries. Clin Orthop (189):116–124

  26. Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Kostuik JP (1990) Evaluation of surgical treatment for burst fractures. Spine 15(7):667–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fehlings MG, Perrin RG (2005) The role and timing of early decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: update with a review of recent clinical evidence. Injury 36(Suppl 2):B13–B26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J et al (1969) The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia I. Paraplegia 7(3):179–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Frymoyer JW, Howe J, Kuhlmann D (1978) The long-term effects of spinal fusion on the sacroiliac joints and ileum. Clin Orthop Relat Res (134):196–201

  30. Gebhard F, Weidner A, Liener UC, Stockle U, Arand M (2004) Navigation at the spine. Injury 35(Suppl 1):S–S45

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gertzbein SD (1992) Scoliosis Research Society. Multicenter spine fracture study. Spine 17(5):528–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghanayem AJ, Zdeblick TA (1997) Anterior instrumentation in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clin Orthop (335):89–100

  33. Goldhahn J, Reinhold M, Stauber M, Knop C et al (2006) Improved anchorage in osteoporotic vertebrae with new implant designs. J Orthop Res 24(5):917–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Haug RH, Street CC, Goltz M (2002) Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(11):1319–1326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hebert JS, Burnham RS (2000) The effect of polytrauma in persons with traumatic spine injury. A prospective database of spine fractures. Spine 25(1):55–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Heyde CE, Ertel W, Kayser R (2005) Management of spine injuries in polytraumatized patients. Orthopade 34(9):889–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C (1996) Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine 21(4):492–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang TJ, Chen JY, Shih HN, Chen YJ, Hsu RW (1995) Surgical indications in low lumbar burst fractures: experiences with anterior locking plate system and the reduction-fixation system. J Trauma 39(5):910–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jackson AB, Dijkers M, Devivo MJ, Poczatek RB (2004) A demographic profile of new traumatic spinal cord injuries: change and stability over 30 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(11):1740–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaneda K, Abumi K, Fujiya M (1984) Burst fractures with neurologic deficits of the thoracolumbar–lumbar spine. Results of anterior decompression and stabilization with anterior instrumentation. Spine 9(8):788–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Knop C, Blauth M, Bühren V, Hax PM et al (1999) Operative Behandlung von Verletzungen des thorakolumbalen Übergangs: Teil 1 “Epidemiologie”. Unfallchirurg 102(12):924–935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Knop C, Blauth M, Bühren V, Hax PM et al (2000) Operative Behandlung von Verletzungen des thorakolumbalen Übergangs: Teil 2 “Operation und Radiologie”. Unfallchirurg 103:1032–1047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Knop C, Blauth M, Buhren V, Arand M et al (2001) Operative Behandlung von Verletzungen des thorakolumbalen Überganges—Teil 3: Nachuntersuchung. Unfallchirurg 104(7):583–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L, Lange U, Zdichavsky M, Blauth M (2001) Entwicklung und Validierung des VAS-Wirbelsäulenscores [Development and validation of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Spine Score]. Unfallchirurg 104(6):488–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Knop C, Reinhold M, Roeder C, Staub L et al (2006) Internet based multicenter study for thoracolumbar injuries: a new concept and preliminary results. Eur Spine J 15(11):1687–1694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P (2006) Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2–L4) burst fractures. Spine 31(8):859–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kostuik JP (1988) Anterior fixation for burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine with or without neurological involvement. Spine 13(3):286–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Ludwig SC, Anderson PA, Lindsey RW, Vaccaro AR (2006) Radiographic measurement techniques for sacral fractures consensus statement of the Spine Trauma Study Group. Spine 31(9):1047–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. La Rosa G, Conti A, Cardali S, Cacciola F, Tomasello F (2004) Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord 42(9):503–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Landreneau RJ, Hazelrigg SR, Mack MJ, Dowling RD et al (1993) Postoperative pain-related morbidity: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 56(6):1285–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lim TH, An HS, Hong JH, Ahn JY et al (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior fixations in an unstable calf spine model. Spine 22(3):261–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Linke B, Butscher A, Schneider R, Wahl D, Gasser B (2003) Holding strength of conventional and locking head screws. Folia Traumatol Lovaniensia 68–79

  53. Lohmann R, Haid K, Stockle U, Raschke M (2007) Epidemiology and perspectives in traumatology of the elderly. Unfallchirurg 110(6):553–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McAfee PC, Bohlman HH, Yuan HA (1985) Anterior decompression of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures with incomplete neurological deficit using a retroperitoneal approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(1):89–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McDonough PW, Davis R, Tribus C, Zdeblick TA (2004) The management of acute thoracolumbar burst fractures with anterior corpectomy and Z-plate fixation. Spine 29(17):1901–1908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McEvoy RD, Bradford DS (1985) The management of burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Experience in 53 patients. Spine 10(7):631–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. McLain RF (2004) Functional outcomes after surgery for spinal fractures: return to work and activity. Spine 29(4):470–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McLain RF (2006) The biomechanics of long versus short fixation for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine 31(11 Suppl):S70–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR (1993) Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(2):162–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Meves R, Avanzi O (2006) Correlation among canal compromise, neurologic deficit, and injury severity in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 31(18):2137–2141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mohanty SP, Venkatram N (2002) Does neurological recovery in thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures depend on the extent of canal compromise? Spinal Cord 40(6):295–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Otte D, Sandor L, Zwipp H (1990) Bedeutung und Mechanismen von Brust- und Lendenwirbelsaulenverletzungen bei Verkehrsunfallen [Significance and mechanism of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries in traffic accidents] Bedeutung und Mechanismen von Brust- und Lendenwirbelsaulenverletzungen bei Verkehrsunfallen. Unfallchirurg 93(9):418–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Pickett GE, Campos-Benitez M, Keller JL, Duggal N (2006) Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spine 31(7):799–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Potulski M, Beisse R, Buhren V (1999) Thoracoscopy-guided management of the “anterior column”. Methods and results. Orthopade 28(8):723–730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rahimi-Movaghar V, Vaccaro AR, Mohammadi M (2006) Efficacy of surgical decompression in regard to motor recovery in the setting of conus medullaris injury. J Spinal Cord Med 29(1):32–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Rampersaud YR, Moro ER, Neary MA, White K et al (2006) Intraoperative adverse events and related postoperative complications in spine surgery: implications for enhancing patient safety founded on evidence-based protocols. Spine 31(13):1503–1510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rath SA, Kahamba JF, Kretschmer T, Neff U, Richter HP, Antoniadis G (2005) Neurological recovery and its influencing factors in thoracic and lumbar spine fractures after surgical decompression and stabilization. Neurosurg Rev 28(1):44–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Reinhold M, Knop C, Lange U, Rosenberger R, Schmid R, Blauth M (2006) Reposition von Verrenkungen und Verrenkungsbrüchen der unteren Halswirbelsäule [Reduction of traumatic dislocations and facet fracture-dislocations in the lower cervical spine]. Unfallchirurg 109(12):1064–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Reinhold M, Schmid R, Knop C, Blauth M (2004) Komplikationsspektrum operativ versorgter Wirbelsäulenverletzungen Eine Analyse der Multicenterstudien I und II der AG Wirbelsäule. Trauma Berufskrankh 7(Supp 2):281–291

    Google Scholar 

  71. Reinhold M, Schmolz W, Canto F, Krappinger D, Blauth M, Knop C (2007) An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies. Unfallchirurg 110(4):327–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Reinhold M, Schwieger K, Goldhahn J, Linke B, Knop C, Blauth M (2006) Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae. Spine 31(4):406–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Sasso RC, Renkens K, Hanson D, Reilly T, McGuire RA Jr, Best NM (2006) Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: anterior-only versus short-segment posterior fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(4):242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Schnee CL, Ansell LV (1997) Selection criteria and outcome of operative approaches for thoracolumbar burst fractures with and without neurological deficit. J Neurosurg 86(1):48–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Seller K, Wahl D, Wild A, Krauspe R, Schneider E, Linke B (2007) Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies. Eur Spine J 16(7):1047–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Seybold EA, Sweeney CA, Fredrickson BE, Warhold LG, Bernini PM (1999) Functional outcome of low lumbar burst fractures A multicenter review of operative and nonoperative treatment of L3–L5. Spine 24(20):2154–2161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Shields CB, Zhang YP, Shields LB, Han Y, Burke DA, Mayer NW (2005) The therapeutic window for spinal cord decompression in a rat spinal cord injury model. J Neurosurg Spine 3(4):302–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Siebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ et al (2006) Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment. Spine 31(25):2881–2890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Speth MJ, Oner FC, Kadic MA, de-Klerk LW, Verbout AJ (1995) Recurrent kyphosis after posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures 24 cases treated with a Dick internal fixator followed for 15–4 years. Acta Orthop Scand 66(5):406–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Spinalcord Injury Information Network (2007) The National SCI Database. http://www.spinalcord.uab.edu

  81. Trafton PG, Boyd CA Jr (1984) Computed tomography of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries. J Trauma 24(6):506–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Hurlbert RJ, Lehman RA Jr et al (2006) Surgical decision making for unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a consensus panel review by the Spine Trauma Study Group. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, van der Tweel I et al (2004) Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine 29(7):803–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Wang ST, Ma HL, Liu CL, Yu WK, Chang MC, Chen TH (2006) Is fusion necessary for surgically treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine?: a prospective, randomized study. Spine 31(23):2646–2652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors like to thank all clinical collaborators of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery Spine for their exceptional commitment to this project throughout the past years. Special thanks go to PD. Dr. L. Audigé for his expert advice and Mark Kanodi, MSc for help with the manuscript preparation.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was supported by the German Association of Trauma Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    M. Reinhold & M. Blauth

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA

    M. Reinhold

  3. Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany

    R. Beisse & V. Bühren

  4. AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation (AOCID), Duebendorf, Switzerland

    L. Audigé

  5. Centre for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charté Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    F. Kandziora

  6. Center for Spine Surgery and Neurotraumatology Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

    F. Kandziora

  7. Department of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University Homburg/Saar, Homburg/Saar, Germany

    A. Pizanis

  8. Trauma Clinic Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria

    R. Pranzl

  9. Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

    E. Gercek

  10. Department of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University Ulm, Ulm, Germany

    M. Schultheiss

  11. Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany

    A. Weckbach

  12. Department of Trauma Surgery, Katharinen Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany

    C. Knop

Authors
  1. M. Reinhold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Knop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Beisse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Audigé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Kandziora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Pizanis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Pranzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Gercek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. M. Schultheiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. A. Weckbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. V. Bühren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. M. Blauth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Reinhold.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reinhold, M., Knop, C., Beisse, R. et al. Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery. Eur Spine J 19, 1657–1676 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1451-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1451-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation