Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective study of the effect of pedicle screw placement on development of the immature vertebra in an in vivo porcine model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

There is increasing awareness of the need for pedicle screw constructs in the treatment of spinal deformities in very young children. However, the long-term effects of pedicle screws on the immature spine are still unclear. We used a porcine model to analyze the morphological changes of the spinal canal and vertebral body in response to the placement of pedicle screws.

Methods

13 newborn pigs were operated on. Each pig received a single pedicle screw at the L2 level. After a tenfold increase in body weight (7 months later), the symmetry of the spinal canal and vertebral body was measured on CT scans of the investigational (L2) and control (L3) levels in terms of the angulations of the instrumented and non-instrumented halves of the vertebral body and spinal canal.

Results

After 7 months, the normalised vertebral body angle had reduced on the non-screw side and increased on the screw side, indicating asymmetry in vertebral body growth in the axial plane. The difference was significant (p = 0.009). However, there was no significant difference between the screw and non-screw sides for the spinal canal angles at the L2 level at either the intraoperative or 7-month follow-up assessment (each p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Pedicle screws in the immature porcine spine have a significant effect on the development of the vertebral body. However, in the present study, no corresponding alteration of the morphology of the spinal canal was observed. Our results provide further support for the existing arguments in favour of pedicle screws when weighing up the many factors to be considered in creating a treatment plan for early onset scoliosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bess RS, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cheh G, Mandel S, Sides B (2007) Comparison of thoracic pedicle screw to hook instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:555–561. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256445.31653.0e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cil A, Yazici M, Daglioglu K, Aydingoz U, Alanay A, Acaroglu RE, Gulsen M, Surat A (2005) The effect of pedicle screw placement with or without application of compression across the neurocentral cartilage on the morphology of the spinal canal and pedicle in immature pigs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1287–1293. doi:00007632-200506010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang H, Sucato DJ (2008) Unilateral pedicle screw epiphysiodesis of the neurocentral synchondrosis. Production of idiopathic-like scoliosis in an immature animal model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2460–2469. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang L, Luo Z-j, Luo L-j, Feng L-J, Meng H (2009) The effect of pedicle screw insertion through the neurocentral cartilage on the growth of immature canine vertebra. Orthop Surg 1:137–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yazici M, Pekmezci M, Cil A, Alanay A, Acaroglu E, Oner FC (2006) The effect of pedicle expansion on pedicle morphology and biomechanical stability in the immature porcine spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E826–E829. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000240759.06855.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beguiristain JL, De Salis J, Oriaifo A, Canadell J (1980) Experimental scoliosis by epiphysiodesis in pigs. Int Orthop 3:317–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeszenszky D (2000) Morphological changes of the spinal canal after placement of pedicle screws in newborn pigs. In: Scoliosis Research Society. Annual Meeting, Cairns, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Swindle M (2007) Biology, handling, husbandry and anatomy. In: Swindle M (ed) Swine in the laboratory: surgery, anesthesia, imaging and experimental techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–13

  9. Maat GJ, Matricali B, van Meerten EL (1996) Postnatal development and structure of the neurocentral junction. Its relevance for spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:661–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vital JM, Beguiristain JL, Algara C, Villas C, Lavignolle B, Grenier N, Senegas J (1989) The neurocentral vertebral cartilage: anatomy, physiology and physiopathology. Surg Radiol Anat 11:323–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Verbout AJ (1985) The development of the vertebral column. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 90:1–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Pedicle screws in 1- and 2-year-old children: technique, complications, and effect on further growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:E460–E466. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000030203.48525.E3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smit TH (2002) The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine—biomechanical considerations. Eur Spine J 11:137–144. doi:10.1007/s005860100346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karaharju E (1967) Deformation of vertebrae in experimental scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 105:3–87

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knutsson F (1961) Growth and differentiation of the postnatal vertebra. Acta Radiol 55:401–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Dave O′Riordan and Jiri Dvorak for their help and support in preparing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamás Fülöp Fekete.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fekete, T.F., Kleinstück, F.S., Mannion, A.F. et al. Prospective study of the effect of pedicle screw placement on development of the immature vertebra in an in vivo porcine model. Eur Spine J 20, 1892–1898 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1889-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1889-0

Keywords

Navigation