Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of three types of lumbar osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis: a case series and evolution of a safe technique for instrumented reduction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The principles of correction of thoraco-lumbar kyphotic deformity (TKLD) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are essentially centred on lordosing osteotomies such as pedicle subtraction closing wedge osteotomy (CWO), polysegmental posterior lumbar wedge osteotomies (PWO) and Smith Peterson’s open wedge osteotomy (OWO) of the lumbar spine. There have been no studies that compared the results of the three osteotomies performed by a single surgeon with a long-term follow-up.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of 31 patients with AS was performed: 12 patients underwent CWO, 10 had OWO, and 9 had PWO. Radiographic assessment was performed at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks and annually thereafter. Clinical assessment included blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and surgical time recordings. All patients were assessed clinically at regular intervals and outcome measures recorded included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, and SRS-22 (recorded in 23 patients).

Results

The mean age at surgery was 54.7 years (40–74 years) and mean duration of symptoms was 3 years (range, 5–8 years). Mean follow-up was 5 years (range, 2–10 years). There was no statistically significant difference between the three techniques with regard to mean duration of surgery and ICU stay. The mean duration of surgery was 7 h (range, 4–9 h) (OWO cases had shorter period than CWO and PWO cases, and the longest period was for CWO cases). The mean ICU stay was 3 days (range, 2–20 days) (the period of stay was shorter in general for OWO and slightly longer for CWO and PWO). Blood loss was expressed as percentage of estimated blood volume (EBV). The mean blood loss in PWO was 23 ± 15.4% (range, 9–36%), CWO was 28 ± 4.5% (range, 12–40%) and in OWO was 15 ± 11% (range, 13–99%). Mean correction of kyphosis was 38° (range, 25°–49°) with CWO, 28° with OWO (range, 24°–38°) and 30° with PWO (range, 28°–40°). In comparison to preoperative scores, statistically significant improvement was noted in all three groups in the postoperative period with regard to ODI, VAS and SRS-22 (p = 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

Conclusion

Better radiographic correction was noted in the CWO and PWO groups, although this was associated with increased blood loss, multiple levels of instrumentation, and increased surgical time compared to OWO. A new safe technique of instrumentation using temporary malleable rods to prevent sagittal translation during the reduction manoeuvre is also described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun J, Sieper J (2007) Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet 369:1379–1390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Kilgore JE (1993) Neurological complications of ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg 78:871–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stafford L, Youssef PP (2002) Spondyloarthropathies: an overview. Intern Med J 32:40–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luken MG, Patel DV, Ellman MH (1982) Symptomatic spinal stenosis associated with ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurgery 11:703–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun J, Bollow M et al (1998) Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive, negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum 41:58–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldtkeller E, Khan MA (2003) Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 23:61–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobs WB, Fehlings MG (2008) Ankylosing spondylitis and spinal cord injury: origin, incidence, management, and avoidance. Neurosurg Focus 24(1):E12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubiak EN, Moskovich R, Errico TJ, Di Cesare PE (2005) Orthopaedic management of ankylosing spondylitis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(4):267–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel MK (1968) Vertebral osteotomy for correction of fixed flexion deformity of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50A:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  10. McMaster MJ, Coventry MB (1973) Spinal osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: technique, complications, and long-term results. Mayo Clin Proc 48:476–487

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Adams JC (1952) Technique, dangers and safeguards in osteotomy of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 34-B:226–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawson CW (1957) Posterior elementectomy in ankylosing arthritis of the spine. Clin Orthop 10:274–281

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerscovich EO, Greenspan A, Montesano PX (1994) Treatment of kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Orthopedics 17:335–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hehne HJ, Zielke K, Böhm H (1990) Polysegmental lumbar osteotomies and transpedicled fixation for correction of long-curved kyphotic deformities in ankylosing spondylitis: report on 177 cases. Clin Orthop 258:49–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Camargo FP, Cordeiro EN, Napoli MM (1986) Corrective osteotomy of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Experience with 66 cases. Clin Orthop 208:157–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Royen BJ, Slot GH (1995) Closing-wedge posterior osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis. Partial corporectomy and transpedicular fixation in 22 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77-B:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chang K-W, Chen Y-Y, Lin C-C, Hsu H-L, Pai K-C (2005) Closing wedge osteotomy versus opening wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity. Spine 30(14):1584–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McMaster MJ (1985) A technique for lumbar spinal osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:204–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Halm H, Metz-Stavenhagen P, Zielke K (1995) Results of surgical correction of kyphotic deformities of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis on the basis of the modified arthritis impact measurement scales. Spine 20(14):1612–1619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Royen BJ, De Gast A (1999) Lumbar osteotomy for correction of treatment of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. A structured review of three methods. Ann Rheum Dis 58:399–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith-Petersen MN, Larson CB, Aufranc OE (1945) Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 27:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  22. La Chapelle EH (1946) Osteotomy of the lumbar spine for correction of kyphosis in a case of ankylosing spondylarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 28:851–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bossers GT (1972) Columnotomy in severe Bechterew kyphosis. Acta Orthop Belg 38:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simmons EH (1977) Kyphotic deformity of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop 128:65–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Emnéus H (1968) Wedge osteotomy of spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Acta Orthop Scand 39:321–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weatherley C, Jaffray D, Terry A (1988) Vascular complications associated with osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: a report of two cases. Spine 13:43–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Herbert JJ (1959) Vertebral osteotomy for kyphosis, especially in Marie–Strumpell arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41A:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  28. Law WA (1969) Osteotomy of the spine. Clin Orthop 66:70–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson MJ, Turkell JH (1949) Multiple spinal wedge osteotomy. Its use in a case of Marie Strümpell spondylitis. Am J Surg 77:777–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Scudese VA, Calabro JJ (1963) Vertebral wedge osteotomy. Correction of rheumatoid (ankylosing) spondylitis. JAMA 186:627–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomasen E (1985) Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop 194:142–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jaffray D, Becker V, Eisenstein S (1992) Closing wedge osteotomy with transpedicular fixation in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop 279:122–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thiranont N, Netrawichien P (1993) Transpedicular decancellation closed wedge vertebral osteotomy for treatment of fixed flexion deformity of spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 18:2517–2522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Weale AE, Marsh CH, Yeoman PM (1995) Secure fixation of lumbar osteotomy. Surgical experience with 50 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res (321):216–222

  35. van Royen BJ, de Kleuver M, Slot GH (1998) Polysegmental lumbar posterior wedge osteotomies for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 7(2):104–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim K-T, Suk K-S, Cho Y-J, Hong G-P, Park B-J (2002) Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Spine 27(6):612–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Willems KF, Slot GH, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW, de Kleuver M (2005) Spinal osteotomy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: complications during first postoperative year. Spine 30(1):101–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rapp GF, Kernek CB (1974) Spontaneous fracture of the lumbar spine with correction of deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56(6):1277–1278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Klems H, Friedebold G (1971) Rupture of the abdominal aorta following a corrective spinal operation for ankylopoietic spondylitis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 108(4):554–563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. McMaster PE (1965) Osteotomy of the spine for fixed flexion deformity. Pac Med Surg 73:314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northern Deanery, Newcastle upon Tyne, TS7-8RG, UK

    Ranganathan Arun

  2. Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

    H. V. Dabke & H. Mehdian

  3. 45, St Cuthbert Avenue Marton in Cleveland, Middlesbrough, TS7-8RG, UK

    Ranganathan Arun

Authors
  1. Ranganathan Arun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. V. Dabke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Mehdian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranganathan Arun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arun, R., Dabke, H.V. & Mehdian, H. Comparison of three types of lumbar osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis: a case series and evolution of a safe technique for instrumented reduction. Eur Spine J 20, 2252–2260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1894-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1894-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation