Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The main objective of all the sagittal compensating mechanisms is to allow a subject to stand and keep an erect position.

Materials and methods

The cascade of compensating mechanisms appears progressively with the increasing amount of imbalance of the spine until compensation is no longer possible. The loss of lumbar lordosis can be considered as the initiating event of sagittal imbalance. This loss of the normal lordosis pushes the C7 plumb line forward.

Results

The assessment of sagittal balance has to include to be complete: a parameter measuring the global balance of the trunk, either C7 plumb line and sacral plateau, the position of the pelvis rotation by the pelvic tilt, and a description of the position of the lower limbs. Those three parameters have been taken into account by the newly described method called full balance integrated (FBI). This evaluation is easily done on a sagittal full spine standing X-ray from C2 to the pelvis, including the first 10 cm of the femur.

Conclusion

Three questions to answer: What is the value of the pelvis incidence? Is the patient balanced? Are there compensatory mechanisms?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrey C, Jund J, Perrin G, Roussouly P (2007) Spinopelvic alignment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg 61:981–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H (2005) Analysis of the sagittal spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duval-Beaupère G, Legaye J (2004) Composante sagittale de la statique rachidienne (in French). Rev Rhum 71:105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, MacEnery KW (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal aligment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guigui P, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Wodecki P, Cardinne L (2003) Valeur physiologique des paramètres pelviens et rachidiens de l’équilibre sagittal du rachis. Analyse d’une série de 250 volontaires (in French). Rev Chir Orthop 89:496–506

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hovorka I, Rousseau P, Bronsard N, Chalali M, Julia M, Carles M, Amoretti N, Boileau P (2008) Extension reserve of the hip in relation to the spine: comparative study of two radiographic methods. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8):771–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Itoi E (1991) Roentgenographic analysis of posture in spinal osteoporotics. Spine 16(7):750–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Matsuno T, Takeda N (2004) A longitudinal study of congruent sagittal spinal alignment in an adult cohort. Spine 29:671–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10:314–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP (2008) Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine 33:1572–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N, Laudet CG, Gorin M, Roger B, Hansen S, Saillant G, Maurs L, Trabelsi R (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, Aunoble S (2011) Thoracolumbar imbalance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique. Eur Spine J 19(Suppl 3):S233–S364. Abstract S 239

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marnay T (1988) Equilibre du rachis et du bassin. Cahiers d’enseignement de la SOFCOT. Elsevier, Paris, pp 281–313

  15. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Illes T (2002) The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 26:104–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2006) The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumbline: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 31:E320–E325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Le Huec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Huec, J.C., Charosky, S., Barrey, C. et al. Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J 20 (Suppl 5), 699 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1938-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1938-8

Keywords

Navigation