Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Drug therapy in spinal tuberculosis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the discovery of effective anti-tuberculosis drugs has made uncomplicated spinal tuberculosis a medical disease, the advent of multi-drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the co-infection of HIV with tuberculosis have led to a resurgence of the disease recently. The principles of drug treatment of spinal tuberculosis are derived from our experience in treating pulmonary tuberculosis. Spinal tuberculosis is classified to be a severe form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and hence is included in Category I of the WHO classification. The tuberculosis bacilli isolated from patients are of four different types with different growth kinetics and metabolic characteristics. Hence multiple drugs, which act on the different groups of the mycobacteria, are included in each anti-tuberculosis drug regimen. Prolonged and uninterrupted chemotherapy (which may be ‘short course’ and ‘intermittent’ but preferably ‘directly observed’) is effective in controlling the infection. Spinal Multi-drug-resistant TB and spinal TB in HIV-positive patients present unique problems in management and have much poorer prognosis. Failure of chemotherapy and emergence of drug resistance are frequent due to the failure of compliance hence all efforts must be made to improve patient compliance to the prescribed drug regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daniel TM (2006) The history of tuberculosis. Respir Med 100:1862–1870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuli SM (2010) Tuberculosis of the skeletal system, 4th edn. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dye C, Watt CJ, Bleed DM et al (2005) Evolution of tuberculosis control and prospects for reducing tuberculosis incidence, prevalence, and deaths globally. JAMA 293:2767–2775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bick KM (1976) Classics of orthopaedics. JB Lippincott Co., Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balasubramanian R, Rajeswari R, SanthaT (2004) How does management of extrapulmonary tuberculosis differ from that of pulmonary tuberculosis? In: Toman’s Tuberculosis case detection, monitoring, treatment, 2nd edn. WHO, Geneva

  6. Raviglipone MC, O’Brien RJ (2008) Tuberculosis. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL et al (eds) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1006–1020

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hong Kong Chest Service/British Medical Research Council (1987) Five-year follow-up of a controlled trial of five 6-month regimens of chemotherapy for pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:339–342

    Google Scholar 

  8. Controlled trial of 2, 4, and 6 months of pyrazinamide in 6-month, three-times-weekly regimens for smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis, including an assessment of a combined preparation of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide (1991) Results at 30 months. Hong Kong Chest Service/British Medical Research Council. Am Rev Respir Dis 143:700–706

  9. Toman K (2004) How many drug-resistant tubercle bacilli can be found in the sputum of patients who have never received treatment for tuberculosis? In: Toman’s tuberculosis case detection, monitoring, treatment, 2nd edn. WHO, Geneva

  10. Grumbach F, Canetti G, Grosset J (1967) Late results of long-term intermittent chemotherapy of advanced, murine tuberculosis: limits of the murine model. Tubercle 48:11–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lotte A, Hatton F, Perdrizet S, Rouillon A (1964) A concurrent comparison of intermittent (twice-weekly) isoniazid plus streptomycin and daily isoniazid plus PAS in the domiciliary treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull World Health Organ 31:247–271

    Google Scholar 

  12. British Thoracic Association (1982) A controlled trial of six months chemotherapy in pulmonary tuberculosis. Second report: results during the 24 months after the end of chemotherapy. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:460–462

    Google Scholar 

  13. Controlled trial of 6-month and 8-month regimens in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (1978) First report. Am Rev Respir Dis 118:219–228

    Google Scholar 

  14. Controlled trial of 6-month and 8-month regimens in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: the results up to 24 months (1979) Tubercle 60:201–210

  15. Balasubramanian R (1991) Fully intermittent 6 months regimen for pulmonary tuberculosis in South India. Indian J Tuberc 38:51–53

    Google Scholar 

  16. Toman K (2004) Toman’s tuberculosis case detection, monitoring, treatment, 2nd edn. WHO, Geneva

  17. Zhang Y, Wade MM, Scorpio A et al (2003) Mode of action of pyrazinamide: disruption of Mycobacterium tuberculosis membrane transport and energetics by pyrazinoic acid. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:790–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization (2003) Treatment of Tuberculosis: guidelines for National Programmes. 3rd edn. WHO, Geneva, p 35

  19. Toman K (2004) How does management of extrapulmonary tuberculosis differs from that of pulmonary tuberculosis? In: Toman’s tuberculosis case detection, monitoring, treatment, 2nd edn. WHO, Geneva

  20. East African/British Medical Research Councils (1973) Controlled clinical trial of four short course (6-month) regimes of chemotherapy for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Lancet 1:1331–1339

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singapore Tuberculosis Service/British Medical Research Council (1981) Clinical trial of six-month and four-month regimes of chemotherapy in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: the results up to 30 months. Tubercle 62:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tuberculosis Research Centre (2001) Low rate of emergence of drug resistance in sputum positive patients treated with short course chemotherapy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 5:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davidson BL (1998) A controlled comparison of directly observed therapy vs self-administered therapy for active tuberculosis in the urban United States. Chest 114:1239–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Weis SE, Slocum P, Blais F et al (1994) The effect of directly observed therapy on the rates of drug resistance and relapse in tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 330:1179–1184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore RD, Chaulk P, Griffiths R et al (1996) Cost-effectiveness of directly observed versus self-administered therapy for tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:1013–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prasad R (2007) Management of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis: practitioners view point. Indian J Tuberc 54:3–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Almeida D, Mehta A, Rodriques C et al (2002) Comparison of drug resistance of tuberculosis from rural area Sakawar and urban tertiary care centre. In: Presented at 110th general meeting of ASM, Los Angeles, USA, Abstract U58

  28. Mukherjee JS, Rich ML, Socci AR et al (2004) Programmes and principles in treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet 363:474–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO (2006) Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug resistant tuberculosis. WHO, Geneva

  30. Lemaire R, Masson B (2000) Risk of transmission of blood-borne viral infection in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:313–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Raviglione MC, Harries AD, Msiska R et al (1997) Tuberculosis and HIV: current status in Africa. AIDS 11:S115–S123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alwood K, Keruly J, Moore-Rice K et al (1994) Effectiveness of supervised, intermittent therapy for tuberculosis in HIV infected patients. AIDS 8:1103–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Okwera A, Whalen C, Byekwaso F et al (1994) Randomised trial of thiacetazone and rifampicin-containing regimens for pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected Ugandans. Lancet 344:1323–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Burman WJ, Gallicano K, Peloquin C (1999) Therapeutic implications of drug interactions in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-related tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 28:419–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Burman WJ, Jones BE (2001) Treatment of HIV-related tuberculosis in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:7–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Navas E, Martin-Davila P, Moreno L et al (2002) Paradoxical reactions of tuberculosis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who are treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. Arch Intern Med 162:97–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Rajasekaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajasekaran, S., Khandelwal, G. Drug therapy in spinal tuberculosis. Eur Spine J 22 (Suppl 4), 587–593 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2337-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2337-5

Keywords

Navigation