Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A decade’s experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000–2009

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose is to study rates, trends, geographic variations and outcome of lumbar spine surgery in the Belgian population during the last decade.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study using administrative data of the largest Belgian sickness fund from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2009. Cases included lumbar laminectomy, combined discectomy and fusion, posterior interarticular fusion, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and standard discectomy. The main outcome measures were age- and sex-adjusted rates of lumbar spine surgery, 1-year mortality, 1-year iterative surgery, no return to work (RTW) rate 1 year after surgery and length of hospital stay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between age, sex, geographic region, type of surgery, year of intervention and duration of pre-operative sick leave on outcome.

Results

Spine surgery rates rose 44 % from 2001 through 2009 and data for 2009 showed twofold variations in spine surgery rates among 10 Belgian provinces. Reported 1-year mortality varied from 0.6 to 2.5 % among surgical procedures performed in 2008. The overall 5-year reoperation rate was 12 %. RTW rates 1 year after standard discectomy, ALIF, PLIF and combined discectomy and fusion for the follow-up sample of 2008 were 14.4, 22.7, 26.1 and 30.6 %, respectively. The median length of hospital stay significantly decreased throughout the decade. Type of surgery and geographic region were significantly related to patient outcomes.

Conclusions

Regional variations highlight professional uncertainty and controversy. The study results point to the need for peer comparisons and surgeon feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nordin M, Balagué F, Cedraschi C (2006) Nonspecific lower-back pain: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:156–167. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000198721.75976.d9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanwye WR (2010) Nonspecific low back pain: evaluation and treatment tips. J Fam Pract 59(8):445–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balagué F, Borenstein DG (1998) How to recognize and treat specific low back pain? Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 12(1):37–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Loeser JD (2009) Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(10):1094–1109. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J 356(22):2245–2256. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa064039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Duffy RL (2010) Low back pain: an approach to diagnosis and management. Prim Care 37(4):729–741. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2010.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bach SM, Holten KB (2009) Guideline update: what’s the best approach to acute low back pain? J Fam Pract 58(12):E1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deyo RA, Mirza SK (2006) Trends and variations in the use of spine surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:139–146. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000198726.62514.75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, McLain R, Shaffer W, Myers M, Glaser J, Hart RA (2005) Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(19):2208–2213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cook C, Santos GC, Lima R, Pietrobon R, Jacobs DO, Richardson W (2007) Geographic variation in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders: 1990 to 2000. Spine J 7(5):552–557. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel MR, Greiner MA, DiMartino LD, Schulman KA, Duncan PW, Matchar DB, Curtis LH (2010) Geographic variation in carotid revascularization among Medicare beneficiaries, 2003–2006. Arch Intern Med 170(14):1218–1225. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES (2006) United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(23):2707–2714. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000248132.15231.fe2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maghout Juratli S, Franklin GM, Mirza SK, Wickizer TM, Fulton-Kehoe D (2006) Lumbar fusion outcomes in Washington State workers’ compensation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2715–2723. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000244589.13674.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Kreuter W (1994) Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(11):1207–1212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Strömqvist B, Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jönsson B, Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons (2009) The Swedish Spine Register: development, design and utility. Eur Spine J. 18:294–304. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1043-4

  16. Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (2009). http://www.riziv.be/information/nl/statistics/health/2009/pdf/statisticshealth2009all.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2011

  17. DeBerard, Masters KS, Colledge AL, Schleusener RL, Schlegel JD (2001) Outcomes of posterolateral lumbar fusion in Utah patients receiving workers’ compensation: a retrospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(7):738–746. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318226abf7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Arts MP, Peul WC, Koes BW, Thomeer RT, Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study (SIPS) Group (2008) Management of sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation in The Netherlands: a survey among spine surgeons. J Neurosurg Spin 9:32–39. doi:10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Street JT, Lenehan BJ, DiPaola CP, Boyd MD, Kwon BK, Paquette SJ, Dvorak MF, Rampersaud YR, Fisher CG (2012) Morbidity and mortality of major adult spinal surgery. A prospective cohort analysis of 942 consecutive patients. Spine J 12:22–34. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malter AD, McNeney B, Loeser JD, Deyo RA (1998) 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(7):814–820

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sur YJ, Kong CG, Park JB (2011) Survivorship analysis of 150 consecutive patients with DIAM™ implantation for surgery of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation. Eur Spine J 20:280–288. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1599-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Flum DR, Wickizer TM, Heagerty PJ, Lenkoski AF, Deyo RA (2012) Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J 12:89–97. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ (1993) Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(11):1463–1470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen TH, Randolph DC, Talmage J, Succop P, Travis R (2011) Long-term outcomes of lumbar fusion among workers’ compensation subjects: a historical cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(4):320–331. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ccc220

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hodges SD, Humphreys SC, Eck JC, Covington LA, Harrom H (2001) Predicting factors of successful recovery from lumbar spine surgery among workers’ compensation patients. J Am Osteopath Assoc 101(2):78–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 296:2451–2459. doi:10.1001/jama.296.20.2451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Veresciagina K, Spakauskas B, Ambrozaitis KV (2010) Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J 19:1450–1458. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1431-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Szpalski M, Nordin M, Skovron ML, Melot C, Cukier D (1995) Health care utilization for low back pain in Belgium. Influence of sociocultural factors and health beliefs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:431–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sobottke R, Aghayev E, Röder C, Eysel P, Delank SK, Zweig T (2012) Predictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango Registry. Eur Spine J 21:411–417. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2016-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kleinstück FS, Grob D, Lattig F, Bartanusz V, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, O’Riordan D, Mannion AF (2009) The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1198–1203. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fcf35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kleinstueck FS, Fekete T, Jeszenszky D, Mannion AF, Grob D, Lattig F, Mutter U, Porchet F (2011) The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain. Eur Spine J 20(7):1166–1173. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1670-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. EuroSpine, the spine society of Europe (2010). http://www.eurospine.org/cm_data/SSE_2010_Final_09.08.2011.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2012

  33. den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW (2006) A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 15:527–536. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0910-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Du Bois MG, Donceel P (2012) Guiding low back claimants to work a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824e4ada

  35. Du Bois M, Donceel P (2008) A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants. Eur Spine J 17:380–385. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0567-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Ekselius L, Nordwall A, Swedish Lumbar Spine Study (2003) Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. Eur Spine J 12:22–33. doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0465-z

    Google Scholar 

  37. Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Svomalainen O (1996) Pre- and postoperative factors associated with return to work following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Am J Ind Med 30:473–478. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199610)30:4<473:AID-AJIM13>3.0.CO;2-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rothoerl RD, Woertgen C, Brawanski A (2002) When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered? Neurosurg Rev 25:162–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Du Bois.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du Bois, M., Szpalski, M. & Donceel, P. A decade’s experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000–2009. Eur Spine J 21, 2693–2703 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2381-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2381-1

Keywords

Navigation