Skip to main content
Log in

Posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion for congenital scoliosis: more than 3 year outcomes and analysis of unanticipated surgeries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Until now there have been many reports on hemivertebra resection. But there were no large series on the posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion. This is a retrospective study to evaluate the surgical outcomes of posterior hemivertebra resection only with bisegmental fusion for congenital scoliosis caused by fully segmented non-incarcerated hemivertebra.

Methods

In our study, 36 consecutive cases (19 males, 17 females) diagnosed with congenital scoliosis, resulting from fully segmented non-incarcerated hemivertebra, treated by posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion were investigated retrospectively, with at least a 3 year follow-up period (36–106 months).

Results

The total number of resected hemivertebra was 36. Mean operation time was 188.6 min with average blood loss of 364.2 ml. The segmental scoliosis was corrected from 36.6° to 5.1° with a correction rate of 86.1 %, and segmental kyphosis(difference to normal segmental alignment) from 21.2° to 5.8° at the latest follow-up. The correction rate of the compensatory cranial and caudal curve is 76.4 and 75.1 %. Unanticipated surgeries were performed on eight patients, including one delayed wound healing, two pedicle fractures, one progressive deformity and four implants removals.

Conclusions

Posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion allows for early intervention in very young children. Excellent correction can be obtained while the growth potential of the unaffected spine could be preserved well. However, it is not indicated for the hemivertebra between L5 and S1. The most common complication of this procedure is implant failure. Furthermore, in the very young children we noted that although solid fusion could be observed in the fusion level, implants migration may still happen during the time of adolescence, when the height of the body developed rapidly. So a close follow-up is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McMaster MJ, Ohtsuka K (1982) The natural history of congenital scoliosis: a study of 251 patients. J Bone Joint Surg[AM] 64A:1128

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winter RB, Moe JH, Eilers VE (1968) Congenital scoliosis: a study of 234 patients treated and untreated. J Bone Joint Surg 50A:1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E et al (2006) Lumbar hemivertebra resection. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 88:1043–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E et al (2006) Thoracolumbar hemivertabra resection by double approach in a single procedure: long-term follow-up. Spine 31:1745–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O (1990) One-stage anterior and posterior hemivertebral resection and arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72(4):536–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hedequist DJ, Hall JE, Emans JB (2005) Hemivertebra excision in children via simultaneous anterior and posterior exposures. J Pediatr Orthop 25:60–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedequist DJ, Hall JE, Emans JB (2004) The safety and efficacy of spinal instrumentation in children with congenital spine deformities. Spine 29:2081–2086 discussion 2087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holte DC, Winter RB, Lonstein JE et al (1995) Excision of hemivertabra and wedge resection in the treatment of congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:159–171

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. King KD, Lowery GL (1991) Results of lumbar hemivertebral excision for congenital scoliosis. Spine 18:778–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazar RD, Hall JE (1999) Simultaneous anterior and posterior hemivertebra excision. Clin Orthop Relat Res (364):76–84

  11. Leatherman KD, Dickson RA (1979) Two-stage corrective surgery for congenital deformities of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 61:324–328

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bergoin M, Bollini G, Taibi L et al (1986) Excision of hemivertabra in children with congental scoliosis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 12:179–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shono Y, Abumi K, Kaneda K (2001) One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and correction using segmental posterior instrumentation. Spine 26:752–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Hemivertebra resection by a posterior approach: innovative operative technique and first results. Spine 27:1116–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Pedicle screws in 1- and 2-year-old children: technique, complications, and effect on further growth. Spine 27:E460–E466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruf M, Harms J (2003) Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation: early correction in children aged 1–6 years. Spine 28:2132–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S et al (2002) Single-stage excision of hemivertabra via the posterior approach alone for congenital spine deformity: follow-up period longer than 10 years. Spine 27:110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith JT, Gollogly S, Dunn HK (2005) Simultaneous anterior-posterior approach through a stotransversectomy for the treatment of congenital kyphosis and acquired kyphoscoliotic deformities. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87:2281–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruf M, Jensen R, Letko L et al (2009) Hemivertebra resection and osteotomies in congenital spine deformity. Spine 34:1791–1799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yaszay B, O'Brien M, Shufflebarger HL et al (2011) Efficacy of hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis: a multicenter retrospective comparison of three surgical techniques. Spine 24:2052–2060

    Google Scholar 

  21. Polly DW Jr, Rosner MK, Monacci W et al (2003) Thoracic hemivertebra excision in adults via a posterior-only approach: report of two cases. Neurosurg Focus 14(2):9–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Papp T, Porter RW, Aspden RM (1994) The growth of the lumbar vertebral canal. Spine 19:2770–2773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Porter RW, Pavitt D (1987) The vertebral canal: I. Nutrition and development, an archaeological study. Spine 12:901–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zindrick MR, Knight GW, Sartori MJ et al (2000) Pedicle morphology of the immature thoracolumbar spine. Spine 25:2726–2735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang JG, Wang SR, Qiu GX et al (2011) The efficacy and complications of posterior hemivertebra resection. Eur Spine J 20:1692–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Zhang, J., Qiu, G. et al. Posterior hemivertebra resection with bisegmental fusion for congenital scoliosis: more than 3 year outcomes and analysis of unanticipated surgeries. Eur Spine J 22, 387–393 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2577-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2577-4

Keywords

Navigation