Skip to main content
Log in

Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical and radiological risk factors for exiting root injuries during transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively examined cohort data from 233 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2011. We divided the patients into the two groups: those who presented a postoperative exiting root injury, such as postoperative dysesthesia or motor weakness (Group A, n = 20), and those who did not suffer from a root injury (Group B, n = 213). We examined the clinical and radiological factors relating exiting root injuries. We measured the active working zone with the exiting root to the upper facet distance (Distance A), the exiting root to disc surface distance at the lower facet line (Distance B) and the exiting root to the lower facet distance (Distance C) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results

Group A exhibited a shorter Distance C (6.4 ± 1.5 versus 4.4 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.001) and a longer operation time (67.9 ± 21.8 versus 80.3 ± 23.7 min, p = 0.017) relative to Group B. The complication rate decreased by 23 % per each 1-mm increase in Distance C (p = 0.000). In addition, the complication rate increased 1.027-fold per each 1-min increase in the operation time (p = 0.027).

Conclusion

We recommend measuring the distance from the exiting root to the facet at the lower disc level according to a preoperative MRI scan. If the distance is narrow, an alternative surgical method, such as microdiscectomy or conventional open discectomy, should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kambin P, Gellman H (1983) Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine—a preliminary-report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 174:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forst R, Hausmann B (1983) Nucleoscopy—a new examination technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 101:219–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Onik G, Helms C, Ginsburg L et al (1985) Percutaneous lumbar diskectomy using a new aspiration probe. Am J Roentgenol 144:1137–1140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kambin P, Nixon JE, Chait A et al (1988) Annular protrusion: pathophysiology and roentgenographic appearance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:671–675

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer HM, Brock M (1993) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Neurosurg Rev 16:115–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsou PM, Yeung AT (2002) Transforaminal endoscopic decompression for radiculopathy secondary to intracanal noncontained lumbar disc herniations: outcome and technique. Spine J 2:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knight MT, Ellison DR, Goswami A et al (2001) Review of safety in endoscopic laser foraminoplasty for the management of back pain. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19:147–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermantin FU, Peters T, Quartararo L et al (1999) A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:958–965

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H et al (2008) Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yeung AT, Tsou PM (2002) Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:722–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho JY, Lee SH, Lee HY (2011) Prevention of development of postoperative dysesthesia in transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation: floating retraction technique. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:214–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Min JH, Kang SH, Lee JB et al (2005) Morphometric analysis of the working zone for endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:132–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mirkovic SR, Schwartz DG, Glazier KD (1995) Anatomic considerations in lumbar posterolateral percutaneous procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1965–1971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM et al (2004) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:E326–E332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD et al (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA 296:2451–2459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD et al (2008) Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2789–2800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs WC, Arts MP, van Tulder MW et al (2012) Surgical techniques for sciatica due to herniated disc, a systematic review. Eur Spine J 21:2232–2251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Osterman H, Seitsalo S, Karppinen J et al (1976) (2006) Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2409–2414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB et al (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 356:2245–2256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorak J et al (1997) Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1765–1772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kambin P, O’Brien E, Zhou L et al (1998) Arthroscopic microdiscectomy and selective fragmentectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 347:150–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G (2005) An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the full-endoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2570–2578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G (2006) A new full-endoscopic technique for the interlaminar operation of lumbar disc herniations using 6-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 331 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:80–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H et al (2007) Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach. J Neurosurg Spine 6:521–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SH, Kang BU, Ahn Y et al (2006) Operative failure of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a radiologic analysis of 55 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E285–E290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Lee JH et al (2009) Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kambin P (1991) Arthroscopic microdiskectomy. Mt Sinai J Med 58:159–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Park WM et al (2003) Posterolateral percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for L5–S1 foraminal or lateral exit zone stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg 99:320–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pedowitz RA, Garfin SR, Massie JB et al (1992) Effects of magnitude and duration of compression on spinal nerve root conduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:194–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rydevik BL, Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR et al (1991) Effects of acute, graded compression on spinal nerve root function and structure. An experimental study of the pig cauda equina. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:487–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S (1989) Edema formation in spinal nerve roots induced by experimental, graded compression. An experimental study on the pig cauda equina with special reference to differences in effects between rapid and slow onset of compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:569–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank Dr. Hyeun Sung Kim at the Herisarang spine hospital for critical advice. Thank Andrew choe for English correction.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, I., Ahn, JO., So, WS. et al. Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety. Eur Spine J 22, 2481–2487 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2849-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2849-7

Keywords

Navigation