Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spondylodiscitis severity code: scoring system for the classification and treatment of non-specific spondylodiscitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Established treatment options of spondylodiscitis, a rare but serious infection of the spine, are immobilization and systemic antibiosis. However, the available data for specific treatment recommendations are very heterogeneous. Our intention was to develop a classification of the severity of spondylodiscitis with appropriate treatment recommendations.

Materials and methods

From 10/1/1998 until 12/31/2004, 37 cases of spondylodiscitis were examined regarding medical history, gender status, location and extent of spondylodiscitis, type and number of operations. Subsequently, a classification of six grades according to severity has been developed with specific treatment recommendations. The further evaluation of our classification and corresponding treatment modalities from 1/1/2005 to 12/31/2009 including further 132 cases, resulted in a classification of only three grades of severity (the SSC—spondylodiscitis severity code), with a follow-up until 12/31/2011. Between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2013, a prospective study of 42 cases was carried out. Overall, 296 cases were included in the study. 26 conservatively treated cases were excluded.

Results and Conclusion

The main localization of spondylodiscitis was the lumbar spine (55 %) followed by the thoracic spine (34 %). The classification of patients into 3 grades of severity depends on clinical and laboratory parameters, the morphological vertebral destruction seen in radiological examinations and the current neurological status. Therapies are adapted according to severity and they include a specific surgical management, systemic antibiotic therapy according to culture and sensitivity tests, physiotherapy and initiation of post-hospital follow-up. 40.6 % of patients are associated with neurological deficits, classified as severity grade 3 and treated surgically with spinal stabilization and decompression. 46.9 % of patients corresponded to severity grade 2, with concomitant vertebral destruction were dorsoventrally stabilized. The 31 patients of severity Grade 1 were treated surgically with dorsal stabilization. From 1998 to 2013, the time from the onset of symptoms to the first surgical treatment was about 69.4 days and has not changed significantly. However, the time from admission to surgical treatment had been reduced to less than 2 days. Also the time of hospitalization was reduced and we see positive effects regarding the sensation of pain. 270 patients underwent surgery. We treated 89 % dorsally and 21 % dorsoventrally. With the spondylodiscitis severity code, a classification of the severity of spondylodiscitis could be established and used for a severity-based treatment. In addition, specific parameters for the treatment of individual grades of severity can be determined in a clinical pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler CP (1985) Spondylitis–Spondylodiscitis. Radiologe 25:291–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akbar M, Lehner B, Doustdar S, Fürstenberg CH, Hemmer S, Bruckner T, Carstens C, Wiedenhöfer B (2011) Pyogene Spondylodiszitis der Brust- und Lendenwirbelsäule. Eine neue Klassifikation zur Entscheidungsfindung bei der Wahl der operativen therapie. Orthopade 40:614–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amini MH, Salzman GA (2013) Infectious spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment. Mo Med 110(1):80–4. Erratum in: Mo Med. 110(2):121

  4. Arnold PM, Baek PN, Bernardi RJ (1997) Surgical management of nontuberculous thoracic and lumbar vertebral osteomyelitis: report of 33 cases. Surg Neurol 47:551–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bettini N, Girardo M, Dema E, Cervellati S (2009) Evaluation of conservative treatment of non specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 18:143–150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Colmenero JD, Jiménez-Mejías ME, Sánchez-Lora FJ, Reguera JM, Palomino-Nicás J, Martos F, de García las Heras J, Pachón J (1997) Pyogenic, tuberculous, and brucellar vertebral osteomyelitis: a descriptive and comparative study of 219 cases. Ann Rheum Dis 56:709–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Agostino C, Scorzolini L, Massetti AP, Carnevalini M, d’Ettorre G, Venditti M, Vullo V, Orsi GB (2010) A seven-year prospective study on spondylodiscitis: epidemiological and microbiological features. Infection 38(2):102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dünkel J, Oestmann A, Jonczy M (2013) Sterile spondylodiscitis. Praxis 18;102(19):1195–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eysel P, Hopf C, Meurer A (1994) Korrektur und Stabilisierung der infektbedingten Wirbelsäulendeformität. Orthopädische Praxis 11:696–703

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eysel P, Hopf C, Vogel I (1997) Primary stable anterior instrumentation or dorsoventral spondylodesis in spondylodiscitis? Results of a comparative study. Eur Spine J 6:152–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Frangen TM, Kalicke T, Gottwald M (2006) Surgical management of spondylodiscitis. An analysis of 78 cases. Unfallchirurg 109:743–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gasbarrini AL, Bertoldi E, Mazzetti M (2005) Clinical features, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to haematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 9:53–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grados F, Lescure FX, Senneville E, Flipo RM, Schmit JL, Fardellone P (2007) Suggestion for managing pyogenic (non-tuberculous) discitis in adults. Joint Bone Spine 74:133–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grammatico L, Baron S, Rusch E (2008) Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in France: analysis of hospital-discharge data 2002–2003. Epidemiol Infect 136:653–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Haaker RG, Senkal M, Kielich T et al (1997) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar discitis. Eur Spine J 6:98–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT et al (2000) Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine 25:1668–1679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT et al (2002) Better treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis using posterior stabilization and titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:149–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Homagk L, Deml O, Hofmann GO (2012) Der IT-gestützte Behandlungspfad als Routinearbeitsinstrument in der Unfallchirurgie. Unfallchirurg 115(12):1076–1084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Homagk L, Wiesner I, Hofmann GO et al (2013) Are IT-based clinical pathways superior to hard-copy form? Zentralbl Chir 138:64–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Keil M, Szczerba L, Kraus G, Abel R (2012) Therapy of septic paraplegia. Orthopade 41(9):742–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klöckner C, Valencia R, Weber U (2009) Alignment of the sagittal profile after surgical therapy of nonspecific destructive spondylodiscitis: ventral or ventrodorsal method—a comparison of outcomes. Orthopade 30:965–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kraft CN, Fell M (2011) Algorithm for treatment of deep spinal infections and spondylodiscitis with in situ instrumentation. Orthopade 41(1):51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krödel A, Stürz H (1989) Differenzierte operative und konservative therapie der spondylitis und spondylodiszitis. Z Orthop 127:587–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krogsgaard MR, Wagn P, Bengtsson J (1998) Epidemiology of acute vertebral osteomyelitis in Denmark: 137 cases in Denmark 1978–1982, compared to cases reported to the National Patient Register 1991–1993. Acta Orthop Scand 69:513–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lehner B, Akbar M, Rehnitz C, Omlor GW, Dapunt U, Burckhardt I (2012) Standards der mikrobiologische Diagnostik der Spondylodiszitis. Orthopade 41(9):702–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lerner T, Hackenberg L, Rosler S et al (2005) Surgical therapy of unspecific and specific spondylodiscitis. Z Orthop 143:204–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, Bullmann V et al (2003) Titanium cages in the surgical treatment of severe vertebral osteomyelitis. Eur Spine J 12:606–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Linhardt O, Matussek J, Refior HJ et al (2007) Longterm results of ventro-dorsal versus ventral instrumentation fusion in the treatment of spondylitis. Int Orthop 31:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Maus U, Andereya S, Gravius S, Ohnsorge JA, Miltner O, Niedhart C (2009) Procalcitonin (PCT) as diagnostic tool for the monitoring of spondylodiscitis. Z Orthop Unfall 147(1):59–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moon MS, Woo YK, Lee KS et al (1995) Posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion for tuberculous kyphosis of dorsal and lumbar spines. Spine 20:1910–1916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mörk S, Kothe R, Ulrich C (2011) Infektionen der Wirbelsäule. Orthopädie Unfallchirurgie up2date 6:423–444

  32. Mückley T, Kirschner M, Hierholzer C, Hofmann GO (2003) Spondylitis–Spondylodiszitis: neue Therapiekonzepte. Trauma Berufskrankh 5(2):296–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oga M, Arizono T, Takasita M, Sugioka Y (1993) Evaluation of the risk of instrumentation as a foreign body in spinal tuberculosis. Spine 18:1890–1894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peters KM, Schwanitz B, Zilkens KW (1992) Spondylodiszitis-eine häufig spät gestellte diagnose. Orthop. Praxis 2:108–112

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rajasekaran S, Soundarapandian S (1998) Progression of kyphosis in tuberculosis of the spine treated by anterior arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 71:1314–1323

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schinkel C, Gottwald M, Andress HJ (2003) Surgical treatment of Spondylodiscitis. Surg Infect 4:387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shoakazemi A, Amit A, Nooralam N, Abouharb A, Gormley M, McKinstry S (2013) Panspinal epidural and psoas abscess with secondary cervical disc space infection. Ulster Med J 82(1):23–25

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Siewe J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Zarghooni K, Sobottke R (2013) Diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis in HIV-positive patients. Acta Orthop Belg 79(5):475–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sobottke R, Seifert H, Fätkenheuer G, Schmidt M, Gossmann A, Eysel P (2008) Current diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 105(10):181–187

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Stüer C, Stoffel M, Hecker J, Ringel F, Meyer B (2013) A staged treatment algorithm for spinal infections. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74(2):87–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vorbeck F, Morscher M, Ba-Ssalamah A, Imhof H (1996) Infektiöse Spondylitis beim Erwachsenen. Radiologe 36:795–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vos FJ, Kullberg BJ, Sturm PD, Krabbe PF, van Dijk AP, Wanten GJ, Oyen WJ, Bleeker-Rovers CP (2012) Metastatic infectious disease and clinical outcome in Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus species bacteremia. Medicine 91:86–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yilmaz U (2011) Spondylodiscitis. Radiologe 51(9):772–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Homagk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Homagk, L., Homagk, N., Klauss, J.R. et al. Spondylodiscitis severity code: scoring system for the classification and treatment of non-specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 25, 1012–1020 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3936-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3936-8

Keywords

Navigation