Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

New classification for the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: validation study on a population of 250 patients with a follow-up of 2 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) is still burdened by a high rate of orthopedic and neurological complications. Despite the rising incidence, the choice of a proper orthopedic treatment is often delayed by the lack of clinical data. The aim of this study was to propose a clinical-radiological classification of pyogenic spondylodiscitis to define a standard treatment algorithm.

Methods

Based on data from 250 patients treated from 2008 to 2015, a clinical-radiological classification of pyogenic spondylodiscitis was developed. According to primary classification criteria (bone destruction or segmental instability, epidural abscesses and neurological impairment), three main classes were identified. Subclasses were defined according to secondary criteria. PS without segmental instability or neurological impairment was treated conservatively. When significant bone loss or neurological impairment occurred, surgical stabilization and/or decompression were performed. All patients underwent clinical and radiological 2-year follow-up.

Results

Type A PS occurred in 84 patients, while 46 cases were classified as type B and 120 as type C. Average time of hospitalization was 51.94 days and overall healing rate was 92.80%. 140 patients (56.00%) were treated conservatively with average time of immobilization of 218.17 ± 9.89 days. Both VAS and SF-12 scores improved across time points in all classes. Residual chronic back pain occurred in 27 patients (10.80%). Overall observed mortality was 4.80%.

Conclusions

Standardized treatment of PS is highly recommended to ensure patients a good quality of life. The proposed scheme includes all available orthopedic treatments and helps spine surgeons to significantly reduce complications and costs and to avoid overtreatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grammatico L, Baron S, Rusch E, Lepage B, Surer N, Desenclos JC, Besnier JM (2008) Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in France: analysis of hospital-discharge data 2002–2003. Epidemiol Infect 136:653–660. doi:10.1017/s0950268807008850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beronius M, Bergman B, Andersson R (2001) Vertebral osteomyelitis in Göteborg, Sweden: a retrospective study of patients during 1990–95. Scand J Infect Dis 33:527–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carragee EJ (1997) Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 79:874–880

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skaf GS, Domloj NT, Fehlings MG, Bouclaous CH, Sabbagh AS, Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS (2010) Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: an overview. J Infect Public Health 3:5–16. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2010.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kehrer M, Pedersen C, Jensen TG, Lassen AT (2014) Increasing incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a 14-year population-based study. J Infect 68:313–320. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2013.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fantoni M, Trecarichi EM, Rossi B, Mazzotta V, Di Giacomo G, Nasto LA, Di Meco E, Pola E (2012) Epidemiological and clinical features of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16(Suppl 2):2–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duarte RM, Vaccaro AR (2013) Spinal infection: state of the art and management algorithm. Eur Spine J 22:2787–2799. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2850-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler JS, Shelly MJ, Timlin M, Powderly WG, O’Byrne JM (2006) Nontuberculous pyogenic spinal infection in adults: a 12-year experience from a tertiary referral center. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2695–2700. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000244662.78725.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutges JP, Kempen DH, van Dijk M, Oner FC (2016) Outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review. Eur Spine J 25:983–999. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4318-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aagaard T, Roed C, Dahl B, Obel N (2016) Long-term prognosis and causes of death after spondylodiscitis: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Infect Dis (Lond) 48:201–208. doi:10.3109/23744235.2015.1103897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nasto LA, Colangelo D, Rossi B, Fantoni M, Pola E (2012) Post-operative spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16(Suppl 2):50–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kulowski J (1936) Pyogenic osteomyelitis of the spine: an analysis and discussion of 102 cases. J Bone Jt Surg Am 18:343–364

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Jun P, Jacobs R, Rosenberg WS, Weinstein PR (2004) General principles in the medical and surgical management of spinal infections: a multidisciplinary approach. Neurosurg Focus 17(6):E1. doi:10.3171/foc.2004.17.6.1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Acosta FL Jr, Chin CT, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Ames CP, Weinstein PR, Chou D (2004) Diagnosis and management of adult pyogenic osteomyelitis of the cervical spine. Neurosurg Focus 17(6):E2. doi:10.3171/foc.2004.17.6.2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruf M, Stoltze D, Merk HR, Ames M, Harms J (2007) Treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis by radical debridement and stabilization using titanium mesh cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:E275–E280. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000261034.83395.7f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grados F, Lescure FX, Senneville E, Flipo RM, Schmit JL, Fardellone P (2007) Suggestion for managing pyogenic (nontuberculous) discitis in adults. Jt Bone Spine 74:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berbari EF, Kanj SS, Kowalski TJ, Darouiche RO, Widmer AF, Schmitt SK, Hendershot EF, Holtom PD, Huddleston PM 3rd, Petermann GW, Osmon DR (2015) Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults. Clin Infect Dis 61:e26–e46. doi:10.1093/cid/civ482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Homagk L, Homagk N, Klauss JR, Roehl K, Hofmann GO, Marmelstein D (2016) Spondylodiscitis severity code: scoring system for the classification and treatment of non-specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 25:1012–1020. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3936-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leone A, Dell’Atti C, Magarelli N, Colelli P, Balanika A, Casale R, Bonomo L (2012) Imaging of spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16(Suppl 2):8–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tins BJ, Cassar-Pullicino VN (2004) MR imaging of spinal infection. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 8:215–229. doi:10.1055/s-2004-835362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen WH, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2007) Surgical treatment of pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis with spinal instrumentation. Eur Spine J 16:1307–1316. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0251-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsieh PC, Wienecke RJ, O’Shaughnessy BA, Koski TR, Ondra SL (2004) Surgical strategies for vertebral osteomyelitis and epidural abscess. Neurosurg Focus 17(6):E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ (2000) Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1668–1679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nasto LA, Colangelo D, Mazzotta V, Di Meco E, Neri V, Nasto RA, Fantoni M, Pola E (2014) Is posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation a safe and effective alternative approach to TLSO rigid bracing for single-level pyogenic spondylodiscitis? Results of a retrospective cohort analysis. Spine J 14:1139–1146. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Przybylski GJ, Sharan AD (2001) Single-stage autogenous bone grafting and internal fixation in the surgical management of pyogenic discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis. J Neurosurg 94(Suppl 1):1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pola E, Logroscino CA, Gentiempo M, Colangelo D, Mazzotta V, Di Meco E, Fantoni M (2014) Medical and surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 16(Suppl 2):35–49

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strowitzki M, Vastmans J, Vogel M, Jaksche H (2011) Complex 360°-reconstruction and stabilization of the cervical spine due to osteomyelitis. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 2):S248–S252. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1645-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P, Zacharatos S (2006) Anterior surgery with insertion of titanium mesh cage and posterior instrumented fusion performed sequentially on the same day under one anesthesia for septic spondylitis of thoracolumbar spine: is the use of titanium mesh cages safe? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:1014–1019. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000215049.08622.9d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fukuta S, Miyamoto K, Masuda T, Hosoe H, Kodama H, Nishimoto H, Sakaeda H, Shimizu K (2003) Two-stage (posterior and anterior) surgical treatment using posterior spinal instrumentation for pyogenic and tuberculotic spondylitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1:E302–E308. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000083318.40123.5e

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they received no grants or funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Catholic University of Rome, 00168, Rome, Italy

    Enrico Pola, G. Autore, V. Pambianco & D. Colangelo

  2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, “Umberto I” University Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, 00185, Rome, Italy

    V. M. Formica

  3. Department of Infectious Diseases, “A. Gemelli” University Hospital, Catholic University of Rome, 00168, Rome, Italy

    R. Cauda & M. Fantoni

Authors
  1. Enrico Pola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Autore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. M. Formica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. Pambianco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Colangelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Cauda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. Fantoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Pola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pola, E., Autore, G., Formica, V.M. et al. New classification for the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: validation study on a population of 250 patients with a follow-up of 2 years. Eur Spine J 26 (Suppl 4), 479–488 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5043-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5043-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation