Skip to main content
Log in

Proximal junctional kyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and compensatory mechanisms in a multicenter national cohort

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a frequent complication, up to 46%, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgical treatment (AIS). Several risk factors have been evoked but remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of PJK in a multicenter cohort of AIS patient and to determine risk factor for PJK.

Materials and methods

Lenke I and II AIS patients operated between 2011 and 2015 (minimum of 2-years follow-up) were included. On fullspine X-rays, coronal and sagittal radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively and at final follow-up. Occurrence of radiological PJK corresponding to a 10° increase in the sagittal Cobb angle, measured between the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV + 2, between postoperative and 2-years follow-up X-rays, was reported.

Results

Among the 365 patients included, 15.6% (n = 57) developed a PJK and only 10 patients required a revision surgery. Preoperatively, PJK patients had significantly larger pelvic incidence (57° ± 13° vs. 51° ± 12°), larger lumbar lordosis (LL) (63° ± 12° vs. 57° ± 11°) and bigger C7 slope. Postoperatively (3 months), in the non-PJK group, thoracic kyphosis (TK) was increased and LL was not significantly different. However, postoperatively, in the PJK group, no significant change was observed in TK, whereas C7 slope decreased and LL significantly increased. There was also a postoperative change in inflection point which was located at a more proximal level in the PJK group. Between postoperative time and final follow-up, TK and LL significantly increased in the PJK group.

Conclusion

PJK is a frequent complication in thoracic AIS, occurring 16%, but remains often asymptomatic (less than 3% of revisions in the entire cohort). An interesting finding is that patients with high pelvic incidence and consequently large LL and TK were more at risk of PJK. As demonstrated in ASD, one of the causes of PJK might be postoperative posterior imbalance that can be due to increased LL, insufficient TK or inflection point shift during surgery.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lonner BS, Ren Y, Newton PO, Shah SA, Samdani AF, Shufflebarger HL et al (2017) Risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-the pelvis and other considerations. Spine Deform 5(3):181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH, Huss GK (1999) Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24(8):795–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhee JM, Bridwell KH, Won DS, Lenke LG, Chotigavanichaya C, Hanson DS (2002) Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of anterior versus posterior instrumentation. Spine 27(21):2350–2356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim J, Cho SK, Cheh G et al (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine 32(24):2731–2738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim J, Cho SK (2005) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 30(18):2045–2050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollenbeck SM, Glattes RC, Asher MA, Lai SM, Burton DC (2008) The prevalence of increased proximal junctional flexion following posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 33(15):1675–1681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO, Clements DH, Betz RR, Marks MC et al (2010) Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine 35(2):177–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim HJ, Yagi M, Nyugen J, Cunningham ME, Boachie-Adjei O (2012) Combined anterior-posterior surgery is the most important risk factor for developing proximal junctional kyphosis in idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(6):1633–1639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang J, Zhao Y, Shen B, Wang C, Li M (2010) Risk factor analysis of proximal junctional kyphosis after posterior fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Injury 41(4):415–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83A(8):1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2003) Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(7):632–639

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maillot C, Ferrero E, Fort D, Heyberger C, Le Huec J-C (2015) Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops(®). Eur Spine J 24(7):1574–1581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH (1989) Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 14(7):717–721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Angelliaume A, Ferrero E, Mazda K, Le Hanneur M, Accabled F, de Gauzy JS et al (2017) Titanium versus cobalt chromium: What is the best rod material to enhance adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction with sublaminar bands? Eur Spine J 26(6):1732–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Serhan H, Mhatre D, Newton P, Giorgio P, Sturm P (2013) Would CoCr rods provide better correctional forces than stainless steel or titanium for rigid scoliosis curves? J Spinal Disord Tech 26(2):E70–E77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30(3):346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Basques BA, Long WD, Golinvaux NS, Bohl DD, Samuel AM, Lukasiewicz AM et al (2015) Poor visualization limits diagnosis of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 17(6):784–789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuelle Ferrero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest except for the authors B. Ilharreborde: consulting for EOS imaging, Medtronic, Implanet, Zimmer Biomet. K. Mazda: consulting for Implanet, royalties from Zimmer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 461 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrero, E., Bocahut, N., Lefevre, Y. et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and compensatory mechanisms in a multicenter national cohort. Eur Spine J 27, 2241–2250 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5640-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5640-y

Keywords

Navigation