Abstract
Purpose
Prior data has set the precedent that female patients fare somewhat worse than men after spine surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of gender on patient-reported outcomes after lumbar spine surgery for degenerative pathologies.
Methods
We identified a consecutive cohort of patients from a prospective registry. Absolute values, as well as change scores for back and leg pain severity (numeric rating scale [NRS]), functional disability (Oswestry disability index [ODI]), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as assessed by EQ-5D were compared among male and female patients.
Results
Of the 3279 included patients, 1543 (47%) were female. At baseline, women reported higher NRS for back and leg pain, higher ODI, but equal HRQOL (all p < 0.05). Otherwise, both groups had comparable baseline data. The absolute differences in patient-reported outcomes persisted at the 6-week, 12- and 24-months follow-up, with women now additionally reporting worse HRQOL as assessed by EQ-5D (all p < 0.05). For all outcome measures, change scores were equal among male and female patients, as were the incidences of complications and reoperations (all p > 0.05). Clinical success was achieved in 82% of men and 79% of women (p = 0.34).
Conclusions
Female patients are generally scheduled for surgery with a more advanced disease state. While women seem to report more severe symptoms at long-term follow-up, the degree of improvement is equal among men and women. Female patients may thus fare worse in terms of absolute scores, but enjoy the same benefit from surgery in relative terms.
Graphical abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Legato MJ, Johnson PA, Manson JE (2016) Consideration of sex differences in medicine to improve health care and patient outcomes. JAMA 316:1865–1866. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.13995
Tschugg A, Löscher WN, Hartmann S et al (2015) Gender influences radicular pain perception in patients with lumbar disc herniation. J Womens Health 24:771–776. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.5108
Tschugg A, Löscher WN, Lener S et al (2017) Gender differences after lumbar sequestrectomy: a prospective clinical trial using quantitative sensory testing. Eur Spine J 26:857–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4891-8
Wise EA, Price DD, Myers CD et al (2002) Gender role expectations of pain: relationship to experimental pain perception. Pain 96:335–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00473-0
Racine M, Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Kloda LA et al (2012) A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception—part 1: Are there really differences between women and men? Pain 153:602–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.025
Racine M, Tousignant-laflamme Y, Kloda LA et al (2012) A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and pain perception—part 2: Do biopsychosocial factors alter pain sensitivity differently in women and men? Pain 153:619–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.026
Kim H-J, Suh B-G, Lee D-B et al (2013) Gender difference of symptom severity in lumbar spinal stenosis: role of pain sensitivity. Pain Phys 16:E715–E723
Ekman P, Möller H, Hedlund R (2009) Predictive factors for the outcome of fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 34:1204–1210. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a19e66
Gehrchen MP, Dahl B, Katonis P et al (2002) No difference in clinical outcome after posterolateral lumbar fusion between patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and those with degenerative disc disease using pedicle screw instrumentation: a comparative study of 112 patients with 4 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 11:423–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0401-2
Katz Jeffrey N, Wright Elizabeth A, Edward Guadagnoli et al (2005) Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:687–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780370512
Schoenfeld AJ, Reamer EN, Wynkoop EI et al (2015) Does Patient sex affect the rate of mortality and complications after spine surgery? A systematic review. Clin Orthop 473:2479–2486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4102-z
Strömqvist F, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B, Karlsson MK (2016) Inferior outcome of lumbar disc surgery in women due to inferior preoperative status: a prospective study in 11,237 patients. Spine 41:1247–1252. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001492
Strömqvist F, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B, Karlsson MK (2016) Gender differences in patients scheduled for lumbar disc herniation surgery: a National Register Study including 15,631 operations. Eur Spine J 25:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4052-5
Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M et al (2018) Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus 44:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17553
Gulati S, Madsbu MA, Solberg TK et al (2017) Lumbar microdiscectomy for sciatica in adolescents: a multicentre observational registry-based study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 159:509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3077-4
Pochon L, Kleinstück FS, Porchet F, Mannion AF (2016) Influence of gender on patient-oriented outcomes in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 25:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4062-3
Staartjes VE, Vergroesen P-PA, Zeilstra DJ, Schröder ML (2018) Identifying subsets of patients with single-level degenerative disc disease for lumbar fusion: the value of prognostic tests in surgical decision making. Spine J 18:558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.242
Strömqvist F, Strömqvist B, Jönsson B et al (2016) Predictive outcome factors in the young patient treated with lumbar disc herniation surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 25:448–455. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.2.SPINE16136
Triebel J, Snellman G, Sandén B et al (2017) Women do not fare worse than men after lumbar fusion surgery: two-year follow-up results from 4780 prospectively collected patients in the Swedish National Spine Register with lumbar degenerative disc disease and chronic low back pain. Spine J 17:656–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.11.001
Staartjes VE, Schröder ML (2018) Effectiveness of a decision-making protocol for the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis with grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis. World Neurosurg 110:e355–e361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.001
van Hooff ML, Spruit M, Fairbank JCT et al (2015) The Oswestry disability index (version 2.1a): validation of a Dutch language version. Spine 40:E83–E90. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000683
Lamers LM, McDonnell J, Stalmeier PFM et al (2006) The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ-5D valuation studies. Health Econ 15:1121–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1124
Schröder ML, de Wispelaere MP, Staartjes VE (2018) Are patient-reported outcome measures biased by method of follow-up? Evaluating paper-based and digital follow-up after lumbar fusion surgery. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.002
Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33:90–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10
Gautschi OP, Smoll NR, Corniola MV et al (2016) Sex differences in lumbar degenerative disc disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 145:52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.008
Robinson ME, Riley JL, Myers CD et al (2001) Gender role expectations of pain: relationship to sex differences in pain. J Pain 2:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2001.24551
Myers CD, Robinson ME, Riley JL, Sheffield D (2001) Sex, gender, and blood pressure: contributions to experimental pain report. Psychosom Med 63:545–550
Staartjes VE, Schröder ML (2018) The five-repetition sit-to-stand test: evaluation of a simple and objective tool for the assessment of degenerative pathologies of the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.2.SPINE171416
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (Medical Research Ethics Committees United, Registration Number: W16.065) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siccoli, A., Staartjes, V.E., de Wispelaere, M.P. et al. Gender differences in degenerative spine surgery: Do female patients really fare worse?. Eur Spine J 27, 2427–2435 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5737-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5737-3