Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review the anatomy and function of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), as well as the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and treatment options for SIJ dysfunction.

Methods

The SIJ serves an extremely crucial function in mobility, stability, and resistance against shear forces. Joint mobility becomes increasingly limited with age-related cartilaginous changes that begin in puberty and continue throughout life. Pain can also be localized to the SIJ itself, known as SIJ dysfunction. A literature review was performed on the anatomy, etiology, risk factors, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options for SIJ dysfunction.

Results

SIJ dysfunction is an under-recognized source of low back pain. Dysfunction can result from various clinical conditions, as well as abnormal motion or malalignment of the joint. Diagnosis and evaluation of SIJ dysfunction are difficult, with use of physical maneuvers and image-guided anesthetic injection. Non-operative treatment options are considered first-line due to high surgical complication rates. Such options include conservative management, radiofrequency treatment, nerve blocks, and articular injections. Surgical management involves open and percutaneous approaches.

Conclusion

With the aging nature of the population, SIJ dysfunction has emerged as an extremely prevalent issue. Current research into the pathophysiology and risk factors of SIJ dysfunction is extremely important for planning preventative and therapeutic strategies. Various treatment options exist including conservative management, radiofrequency, nerve blocks, intra-articular or peri-articular injections, and surgical fixation. Improved diagnostic methods in clinical practice are thus critical to properly identify patients suffering from SIJ dysfunction, plan early intervention, and hasten return to function.

Level of Evidence I

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen SP (2005) Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. Anesth Analg 101(5):1440–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kampen W, Tillmann B (1998) Age-related changes in the articular cartilage of human sacroiliac joint. Anat Embryol 198:505–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bao H, Liabaud B, Varghese J et al (2016) Does pelvic incidence increase with age? An analysis of 1625 adults. Spine J 16:S356–S357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bowen V, Cassidy JD (1981) Macroscopic and microscopic anatomy of the sacroiliac joint from embryonic life until the eighth decade. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6(6):620–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT et al (2012) The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat 221(6):537–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R et al (1998) Insufficient lumbopelvic stability: a clinical, anatomical and biomechanical approach to ‘a-specific’ low back pain. Man Ther 3(1):12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capobianco R, Cher D, SIFI Study Group (2015) Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion in women with persistent post-partum posterior pelvic girdle pain: 12-month outcomes from a prospective, multi-center trial. Springerplus. 4:570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dontigny RL (1979) Dysfunction of the sacroiliac joint and its treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1(1):23–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raj MA, Ampat G, Varacallo M (2020) Sacroiliac Joint Pain. StatPearls Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiapour A, Abdelgawad AA, Goel VK et al (2012) Relationship between limb length discrepancy and load distribution across the sacroiliac joint–a finite element study. J Orthop Res 30(10):1577–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sembrano JN, Polly DW Jr (2009) How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(1):E27-32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peebles R, Jonas CE (2017) Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in the athlete: diagnosis and management. Curr Sports Med Rep 16(5):336–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen SP, Chen Y, Neufeld NJ (2013) Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Neurother 13(1):99–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nessim A, Cho W, Applebaum A et al (2019) Infradjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion: an analysis of pelvic parameters. E-POSTER 215: presented at 26th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques 2019; Amsterdam

  15. DuPlissis S, Hedden R, Manning N, et al (2016) The Effect of Hip and Hamstring Pathology on Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Case Series. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/dpt_papers/52

  16. Buijs E, Visser L, Groen G (2007) Sciatica and the sacroiliac joint: a forgotten concept. BJA Br J Anaesth 99(5):713–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Broadhurst NA, Bond MJ (1998) Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Spinal Disord 11(4):341–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kato S, Demura S, Matsubara H et al (2019) Utility of bone SPECT/CT to identify the primary cause of pain in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1):185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1236-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Standaert CJ (2008) Low back pain in the adolescent athlete. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 19(2):287–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2008.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berthelot JM, Labat JJ, Le Goff B et al (2006) Provocative sacroiliac joint maneuvers and sacroiliac joint block are unreliable for diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. Joint Bone Spine 73(1):17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD, Lindley EM et al (2016) Sacroiliac joint pain and its treatment. Clin Spine Surg 29(2):42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thawrani DP, Agabegi SS, Asghar F (2019) Diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(3):85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stelzer W, Aiglesberger M, Stelzer D, Stelzer V (2013) Use of cooled radiofrequency lateral branch neurotomy for the treatment of sacroiliac joint-mediated low back pain: a large case series. Pain Med 14(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen HC, McKenzie-Brown AM, Cohen SP et al (2007) Sacroiliac joint interventions: a systematic review. Pain Phys 10(1):165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Murakami E, Kurosawa D, Aizawa T (2018) Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: an anterior approach and clinical outcomes with a minimum 5-year follow up. J Neurosurg SPINE SPI 29(3):279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshihara H (2012) Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: current knowledge. Eur Spine J 21(9):1788–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanaclocha V, Herrera JM, Sáiz-Sapena N et al (2018) Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion, radiofrequency denervation, and conservative management for sacroiliac joint pain: 6-year comparative case series. Neurosurgery 82(1):48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dengler JD, Kools D, Pflugmacher R et al (2017) 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial of conservative management vs. minimally invasive surgical treatment for sacroiliac joint pain. Physician. 20(6):537–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Polly DW, Swofford J, Whang PG et al (2016) two-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion vs non-surgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Int J Spine Surg. https://doi.org/10.14444/3028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Khurana A, Guha AR, Mohanty K, Ahuja S (2009) Percutaneous fusion of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: clinical and radiological outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(5):627–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Spain K, Holt T (2017) Surgical revision after sacroiliac joint fixation or fusion. Int J Spine Surg 11(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dall BE, Eden SV, Cho W et al (2019) Biomechanical analysis of motion following sacroiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 68:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ishida W, Elder BD et al (2017) Comparison between S2-Alar-Iliac screw fixation and iliac screw fixation in adult deformity surgery: reoperation rates and spinopelvic parameters. Global Spine J 7(7):672–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu AM, Chen D, Chen CH et al (2017) The technique of S2-alar-iliac screw fixation: a literature review. AME Med J 12(12):179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cho W and Bucklen B (2017) An in vitro biomechanical analysis of contralateral sacroiliac joint motion following unilateral sacroiliac reconstruction. abstract presented at the annual NASS meeting; Orlando, Florida

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by AA, AN, and WC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woojin Cho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gartenberg, A., Nessim, A. & Cho, W. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur Spine J 30, 2936–2943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06927-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06927-9

Keywords

Navigation