Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antibacterial hydrogel coating in joint mega-prosthesis: results of a comparative series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Joint mega-prosthesis after bone tumors, severe trauma or infection is associated with high rates of post-surgical septic complications. A fast-resorbable antibacterial hydrogel coating (DAC®, Defensive Antibacterial Coating) has previously been shown to be able to significantly reduce surgical site infection in various clinical settings. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DAC hydrogel coating to prevent early periprosthetic joint infection after joint mega-prosthesis.

Methods

In this three-centers, case–control study, 43 patients, treated with an antibacterial hydrogel coated mega-prosthesis for oncological (N = 39) or non-oncological conditions (N = 4), were retrospectively compared with 43 matched controls, treated with mega-implants without the coating. Clinical, laboratory and radiographic examinations were performed to evaluate the occurrence of post-surgical infection, complications and adverse events.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 2 years, no evidence of infection or adverse events were observed in the DAC-treated group, compared to six cases of post-surgical infection in the control group.

Conclusion

This matched case–control study shows that a fast-resorbable, antibiotic-loaded coating can be safely used to protect joint mega-prosthesis, providing a reduction of early surgical site infections with no side effects. Larger prospective trials with longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm this report.

Trial registration

RS1229/19 (Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Experimental Registry Number)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data are available hospital archives on request.

References

  1. Heisel C, Kinkel S, Bernd L, Ewerbeck V (2006) Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs. Int Orthop 30:452–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0207-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Arduino JM, Kaye KS, Reed SD, Peter SA, Sexton DJ, Chen LF, Hardy NC, Tong SY, Smugar SS, Fowler VG Jr, Anderson DJ (2015) Staphylococcus aureus infections following knee and hip prosthesis insertion procedures. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 4:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-015-0057-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Benedetto P, Di Benedetto ED, Buttironi MM, De Franceschi D, Beltrame A, Gissoni R, Cainero V, Causero A (2017) Two-stage revision after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomed 88(2-S):92–97. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Allison DC, Huang E, Ahlmann ER, Carney S, Wang L, Menendez LR (2014) Periprosthetic infection in the orthopedic tumor patient. JISRF Reconstr Rev 4:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kapoor SK, Thiyam R (2015) Management of infection following reconstruction in bone tumors. J Clin Orthop Trauma 6:244–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2015.04.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mavrogenis AF, Pala E, Angelini A, Calabro T, Romagnoli C, Romantini M, Drago G, Ruggieri P (2015) Infected prostheses after lower-extremity bone tumor resection: clinical outcomes of 100 patients. Surg Infect 16(3):267–275. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2014.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Capanna R, Scoccianti G, Frenos F, Vilardi A, Beltrami G, Campanacci DA (2015) What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:820–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3736-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ercolano LB, Christensen T, McGough R, Weiss K (2013) Treatment solutions are unclear for perimegaprosthetic infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3204–3213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2852-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hettwer WH, Horstmann PF, Hovgaard TB, Grum-Scwensen TA, Petersen MM (2015) Low infection rate after tumor hip arthroplasty for metastatic bone disease in a cohort treated with extended antibiotic prophylaxis. Adv Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/428986

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Azab MA, Allen MJ, Daniels JB (2016) Evaluation of a silver-impregnated coating to inhibit colonization of orthopaedic implants by biofilm forming methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 29(4):347–350. https://doi.org/10.3415/VCOT-15-08-0134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wyatt MC, Foxall-Smith M, Roberton A, Beswick A, Kieser DC, Whitehouse MR (2019) The use of silver coating in hip megaprostheses: a systematic review. Hip Int 29(1):7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018811070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Romanò CL, Scarponi S, Gallazzi E, Romanò D, Drago L (2015) Antibacterial coating of implants in orthopaedics and trauma: a classification proposal in an evolving panorama. J Orthop Surg Res 10:157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0294-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Drago L, Boot W, Dimas K, Malizos K, Hänsch GM, Stuyck J, Gawlitta D, Romanò CL (2014) Does implant coating with antibacterial-loaded hydrogel reduce bacterial colonization and biofilm formation in vitro? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3311–3323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3558-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Giammona G, Pitarresi G, Palumbo FS, Maraldi S, Scarponi S, Romanò CL (2018) Hyaluronic-based antibacterial hydrogel coating for implantable biomaterials in orthopedics and trauma: from basic research to clinical applications. In: Hydrogels, Sajjad Haider and Adnan Haider, IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73203

  15. Malizos K, Blauth M, Danita A, Capuano N, Mezzoprete R, Logoluso N, Drago L, Romanò CL (2017) Fast-resorbable antibiotic-loaded hydrogel coating to reduce post-surgical infection after internal osteosynthesis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Traumatol 18:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-017-0442-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McPherson EJ, Woodson C, Holtom P, Roidis N, Shufelt C, Patzakis M (2002) Periprosthetic total hip infection: outcomes using a staging system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 403:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Romanò CL, Battaglia A, Suardi V, Romanò D, Baldi A, Zoccali C (2019) Antibacterial hydrogel coating of implants in orthopedics and trauma: surgical technique and clinical applications. Maitrise Orthop 1:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parvizi J, Gehrke T (2014) Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 29(7):1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sambri A, Maso A, Storni E, Megaloikonomos PD, Igoumenou VG, Errani C, Mavrogenis AF, Bianchi G (2019) Sonication improves the diagnosis of megaprosthetic infections. Orthopedics 42(1):28–32. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20181010-06

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ, Coll-Mesa L, Pala E, Guerra G, Ruggieri P (2011) Infected tumor prostheses. Orthopedics 34(12):991–1000. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20111021-24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Benatto MT, Hussein AM, Gava NF, Maranho DA, Engel EE (2019) Complications and cost analysis of hemipelvectomy for the treatment of pelvic tumors. Acta Ortop Bras 27(2):104–107. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192702206721

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Müller D, Kaiser D, Sairanen K, Studhalter T, Uçkay İ (2019) Antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections in orthopaedic oncology—a narrative review of current concepts. J Bone Jt Infect 4(6):254–263. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.39050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsuchiya H, Shirai T, Nishida H, Murakami H, Kabata T, Yamamoto N, Watanabe K, Nakase J (2012) Innovative antimicrobial coating of titanium implants with iodine. J Orthop Sci 17(5):595–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-012-0247-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuehl R, Brunetto PS, Woischnig AK, Varisco M, Rajacic Z, Vosbeck J, Terracciano L, Fromm KM, Khanna N (2016) Preventing implant-associated infections by silver coating. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60(4):2467–2475. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.02934-15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hardes J, Henrichs MP, Hauschild G, Nottrott M, Guder W, Streitbuerger A (2017) Silver-coated megaprosthesis of the proximal tibia in patients with sarcoma. J Arthroplasty 32(7):2208–2213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsikopoulos K, Sidiropoulos K, Kitridis D, Hassan A, Drago L, Mavrogenis A, McBride D (2020) Is coating of titanium implants effective at preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections? A meta-analysis of animal model studies. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04660-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Streitbuerger A, Henrichs MP, Hauschild G, Nottrott M, Guder W, Hardes J (2019) Silver-coated megaprostheses in the proximal femur in patients with sarcoma. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(1):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2270-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sambri A, Zucchini R, Giannini C, Zamparini E, Viale P, Donati DM, De Paolis M (2020) Silver-coated (PorAg®) endoprosthesis can be protective against reinfection in the treatment of tumor prostheses infection. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30(8):1345–1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02705-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mijnendonckx K, Leys N, Mahillon J, Silver S, Van Houdt R (2013) Antimicrobial silver: uses, toxicity and potential for resistance. Biometals 26(4):609–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-013-9645-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fiore M, Sambri A, Zucchini R, Giannini C, Donati DM, De Paolis M (2020) Silver-coated megaprosthesis in prevention and treatment of peri-prosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis about efficacy and toxicity in primary and revision surgery. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02779-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wafa H, Grimer RJ, Reddy K, Jeys L, Abudu A, Carter SR, Tillman RM (2015) Retrospective evaluation of the incidence of early periprosthetic infection with silver-treated endoprostheses in high risk patients: case-control study. Bone Joint J 97-b(2):252–257. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.97b2.34554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zajonz D, Birke U, Ghanem M, Prietzel T, Josten C, Roth A, Fakler JKM (2017) Silver-coated modular megaendoprostheses in salvage revision arthroplasty after periimplant infection with extensive bone loss—a pilot study of 34 patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):383. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1742-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Romanò CL, Tsuchiya H, Morelli I, Battaglia AG, Drago L (2019) Antibacterial coating of implants: are we missing something? Bone Joint Res 8(5):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.85.BJR-2018-0316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fleischman AN, Austin MS (2017) Local intra-wound administration of powdered antibiotics in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Jt Infect 2(1):23–28. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.16649

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tubaki VR, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP (2013) Effects of using intravenous antibiotic only versus local intrawound vancomycin antibiotic powder application in addition to intravenous antibiotics on postoperative infection in spine surgery in 907 patients. Spine 38(25):2149–2155. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Romanò CL, De Vecchi E, Bortolin M, Morelli I, Drago L (2017) Hyaluronic acid and its composites as a local antimicrobial/antiadhesive barrier. J Bone Jt Infect 2(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Giavaresi G, Meani E, Sartori M, Ferrari A, Bellini D, Sacchetta AC, Meraner J, Sambri A, Vocale C, Sambri V, Fini M, Romanò CL (2014) Efficacy of antibacterial-loaded coating in an in vivo model of acutely highly contaminated implant. Int Orthop 38(7):1505–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2237-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Boot W, Gawlitta D, Nikkels PGJ, Pouran B, van Rijen MHP, Dhert WJA, Vogely HC (2017) Hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel coating does not affect bone apposition at the implant surface in a rabbit model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1911–1919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5310-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Capuano N, Logoluso N, Gallazzi E, Drago L, Romanò CL (2018) One-stage exchange with antibacterial hydrogel coated implants provides similar results to two-stage revision, without the coating, for the treatment of peri-prosthetic infection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3362–3367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4896-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Borchardt RA, Tzizik D (2018) Update on surgical site infections: the new CDC guidelines. JAAPA 31(4):52–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000531052.82007.42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR, Infectious Diseases Society of America (2013) Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zimmerli W, Ochsner PE (2003) Management of infection associated with prosthetic joints. Infection 31(2):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-002-3079-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Carlo L. Romanò for his technical assistance and bibliographic search.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.Z., G.S. and F.L.G. contributed to conceptualization; C.Z., G.S., R.B., P.A.D., F.L.G. and D.A.C. were involved in surgeries and methodology ; C.Z. contributed to writing—original draft preparation; R.B., P.A.D. and D.A.C. were involved in supervision and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmine Zoccali.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

RS1229/19 (Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Experimental Registry Number).

Consent to participate

All patients gave their consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zoccali, C., Scoccianti, G., Biagini, R. et al. Antibacterial hydrogel coating in joint mega-prosthesis: results of a comparative series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 1647–1655 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02884-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02884-7

Keywords

Navigation