Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robot guidance for percutaneous minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws for pyogenic spondylodiscitis is associated with lower rates of wound breakdown compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided instrumentation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Postoperative wound healing can pose a problem in patients undergoing instrumented surgery for pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Robotic guidance allows the minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine. We assessed whether using this technique to perform minimally invasive surgery had an impact on wound healing in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis when compared to conventional open fluoroscopy-guided surgery. We reviewed charts of 206 consecutive patients who underwent instrumentation for pyogenic spondylodiscitis. The need for wound revision was the primary outcome measure. Patient variables and comorbidities as well as surgical technique (robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided) were analyzed. We also compared fluoroscopy times between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of wound breakdown. A total of 206 patients underwent surgery for spondylodiscitis. Robotic surgical assistance was used for percutaneous instrumentation in 47.6% of cases (n = 98). Wound healing problems requiring revision occurred in 30 out of 206 patients (14.6%). Univariate analysis revealed a potential association of wound breakdown with (1) robotic technique, (2) age > 70 years, and (3) the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. After multivariate correction however, only robotic technique retained significance with an odds ratio of 0.39 (CI 95% 0.16–0.94; p = 0.035). Wound revision was required in eight out of 98 patients (8.1%) in the robot group and 22/108 (20%) in the conventional surgery group. Fluoroscopy times were significantly lower in the robot group with a mean of 123 ± 86 s in comparison with a mean of 157 ± 99 s in the conventional group (p = 0.014). While initially designed to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, robot-assisted minimally invasive technique had a tangible effect on both radiation exposure and the rate of wound breakdown in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis in our large single-center study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bettini N, Girardo M, Dema E, Cervellati S (2009) Evaluation of conservative treatment of non specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):143–150

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaudhary SB, Vives MJ, Basra SK, Reiter MF (2007) Postoperative spinal wound infections and postprocedural diskitis. J Spinal Cord Med 30:441–451

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen S, Anderson MV, Cheng WK, Wongworawat MD (2009) Diabetes associated with increased surgical site infections in spinal arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1670–1673

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. de Heredia FP, Gomez-Martinez S, Marcos A (2012) Obesity, inflammation and the immune system. Proc Nutr Soc 71:332–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferraz EM, Bacelar TS, Aguiar JL, Ferraz AA, Pagnossin G, Batista JE (1992) Wound infection rates in clean surgery: a potentially misleading risk classification. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:457–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fontaine R, Kim M, Kieny R (1954) Surgical treatment of peripheral circulation disorders. Helv Chir Acta 21:499–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujii T, Tabe Y, Yajima R, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, Kuwano H (2011) Relationship between C-reactive protein levels and wound infections in elective colorectal surgery: C-reactive protein as a predictor for incisional SSI. Hepato-Gastroenterology 58:752–755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerado E, Cervan AM (2012) Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis: an update. Int Orthop 36:413–420

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Wilson P, Davidson BR (2013) Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) related complications in surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD010268

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hadelsberg UP, Harel R (2016) Hazards of ionizing radiation and its impact on spine surgery. World Neurosurg 92:353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ (2000) Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1668–1679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holt DR, Kirk SJ, Regan MC, Hurson M, Lindblad WJ, Barbul A (1992) Effect of age on wound healing in healthy human beings. Surgery 112:293–297; discussion 297–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V (2011) Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J 20:860–868

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim CW, Lee YP, Taylor W, Oygar A, Kim WK (2008) Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine J 8:584–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HJ, Jung WI, Chang BS, Lee CK, Kang KT, Yeom JS (2016) A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot. doi:10.1002/rcs.1779

  16. Mann S, Schutze M, Sola S, Piek J (2004) Nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiscitis: clinical manifestations, surgical treatment, and outcome in 24 patients. Neurosurg Focus 17:E3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Lerner J, Engelhart L, Knight T, Wang MY (2011) Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 14:771–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miric A, Inacio MC, Namba RS (2014) The effect of chronic kidney disease on total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 29:1225–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O'Shea D, Cawood TJ, O'Farrelly C, Lynch L (2010) Natural killer cells in obesity: impaired function and increased susceptibility to the effects of cigarette smoke. PLoS One 5:e8660

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. O'Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG (2009) Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 11:471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Mayfield J et al (2008) Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE, Johnson EL, Wright TG, Robson MC et al (2014) Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes 2014:638936

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier G (2013) Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):12–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schatlo B, Martinez R, Alaid A, von Eckardstein K, Akhavan-Sigari R, Hahn A et al (2015) Unskilled unawareness and the learning curve in robotic spine surgery. Acta Neurochir 157:1819–1823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, Kotowski M, Schaller K, Tessitore E (2014) Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine 20:636–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shiban E, Janssen I, Wostrack M, Krieg SM, Horanin M, Stoffel M et al (2014) Spondylodiscitis by drug-multiresistant bacteria: a single-center experience of 25 cases. Spine J 14:2826–2834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shiban E, Janssen I, Wostrack M, Krieg SM, Ringel F, Meyer B et al (2014) A retrospective study of 113 consecutive cases of surgically treated spondylodiscitis patients: a single-center experience. Acta Neurochir 156:1189–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sobottke R, Seifert H, Fatkenheuer G, Schmidt M, Gossmann A, Eysel P (2008) Current diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int 105:181–187

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Valancius K, Hansen ES, Hoy K, Helmig P, Niedermann B, Bunger C (2013) Failure modes in conservative and surgical management of infectious spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 22:1837–1844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Villard J, Ryang YM, Demetriades AK, Reinke A, Behr M, Preuss A et al (2014) Radiation exposure to the surgeon and the patient during posterior lumbar spinal instrumentation: a prospective randomized comparison of navigated versus non-navigated freehand techniques. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) 39:1004–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bawarjan Schatlo.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alaid, A., von Eckardstein, K., Smoll, N.R. et al. Robot guidance for percutaneous minimally invasive placement of pedicle screws for pyogenic spondylodiscitis is associated with lower rates of wound breakdown compared to conventional fluoroscopy-guided instrumentation. Neurosurg Rev 41, 489–496 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0877-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0877-1

Keywords

Navigation