MANAGEMENT OF NEUROMUSCULAR SCOLIOSIS

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70096-1Get rights and content

Neuromuscular scoliosis pertains to coronal plane deformity of the spine in patients with abnormalities of the myoneural pathways of the body. The disorders which cause this type of deformity comprise a group of diseases characterized by a breakdown in the normal neural integrated pathway that includes the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerves, neuromuscular junction, and muscles. Characteristically, patients with these diseases have poor head control, lack of neck and trunk balance, and discoordination.82 These diverse diseases and conditions share many common features, and patterns of natural history, evaluation, and management.47 The final functional path in this abnormal sequence is the muscle unit, which manifests dysfunction through decreased motion (flaccidity), increased motion (spasticity), or out-of-sequence motion (dyskinetic).82 Scoliosis associated with these neuromuscular dysfunctional states is classified by the Scoliosis Research Society into the following system:9

With so many causes for neuromuscular scoliosis, the patterns and incidence vary with each patient and each disease. In contrast to the treatment of curve patterns found in idiopathic scoliosis, with which most spinal surgeons are most familiar, the patterns in neuromuscular conditions are quite varied. Idiopathic scoliosis curve patterns are well recognized and constant with a consistent lordoscoliosis found in thoracic curves. Although some neuromuscular conditions produce patterns similar to idiopathic scoliosis, others present as long C-shaped curves collapsing into scoliosis or kyphosis, often extending into and including the sacrum as part of the curve.47

Kyphosis is an important part of the neuromuscular deformity pattern and must be carefully considered in the evaluation of these deformities. The kyphosis is characteristically due to compromise in the muscular function of dynamic support for vertebral column stability.82 This compromise in support is associated with a postural curve that compromises head and neck positioning, which worsens in the growing spine. Small curves can produce asymetric forces on the vertebral end plates paving the way for the relentless development of a progressive deformity with permanent disk, vertebral, and facet joint alterations14 via the Heuter Volkmann law. The end plate on the concave side of the curve, whether it be in the sagittal or coronal plane, is subject to increased compression causing decreased growth. On the convex side, growth is subject to decreased loading causing an increased growth. This increased growth can result in a wedge-shaped deformity occurring in the vertebral body, which can worsen over time.94 Because of this and other factors, the earlier a curve's onset, the greater is the potential for increased severity and progression of the deformity over time. Weakness in the bone structure itself brought on by disuse, osteopenia, and anti-seizure medication induced osteomalacia adds to the weakness of the bone structure in the individual vertebral deformity. Spinal deformity in neuromuscular scoliosis results from a complex set of interactions between adverse biomechanical conditions superimposed on compromised biologic factors in the patient.

Section snippets

CHARACTERISTICS OF NEUROMUSCULAR SCOLIOSIS

Neuromuscular scoliosis is generally known for an early onset with rapid progression during growth and continued progression after skeletal maturity. There are often compromised functional abilities and the curves are generally long, extend into the sacrum, and are associated with pelvic obliquity.31, 82

The earlier the neuromuscular disorder is evident and the more severe the disorder, the greater is the likelihood of severe scoliosis development.32, 40 The average age of onset in patients with

NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROMUSCULAR SCOLIOSIS

The goal for nonoperative management of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis is the same as the operative goal: to maintain the spine in a balanced position in the coronal and sagittal planes over a level pelvis.13, 49, 64 This maintenance should be done in a manner which controls curves resulting from postural deformities from collapsing while in the upright position. For structural curves, orthoses that minimize respiratory compromise and maximize functional ability can be used to achieve

General Considerations

Surgical stabilization of neuromuscular scoliosis constitutes the mainstay of treatment for this deformity. The operative treatment of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis is more complex than that of patients with idiopathic scoliosis because of a number of additional factors. The patients are commonly in a debilitated state of health from their underlying disorder with poor nutritional status, poor bone quality, compromised respiratory function, and underlying low grade urosepsis. The

NEUROPATHIC VERSUS MYOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

As classified by the Scoliosis Research Society, the primary types of neuromuscular scoliosis are neuropathic or myopathic. The disease entities thought best to represent each of these groups are cerebral palsy and Duchenne's muscular dystrophy. A more in-depth discussion of each of these disorders follows to help in the understanding and management of patients characterized by these two disorders.

SUMMARY

Complications in patients with neuropathic and myopathic scoliosis can be kept at an acceptable rate by careful preoperative evaluation and preparation of patients. The use of segmental spinal instrumentation has allowed for correction in coronal and sagittal planes without use of postoperative orthoses. Distribution of the forces over multiple levels has allowed for improved correction and stability, leading to lower pseudarthrosis rates. Anterior fusion is required in most patients with

References (99)

  • B. Allen et al.

    Neurologic injuries with the Galveston technique of L-rod instrumentation for scoliosis

    Spine

    (1986)
  • B. Allen et al.

    L-rod instrumentation for scoliosis in cerebral palsy

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1982)
  • G. Balmer et al.

    The incidence and treatment of scoliosis in cerebral palsy

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (1968)
  • J. Banta et al.

    Resolution: A 15 year old with spastic quadriplegia and a 60 degree scoliosis should have a posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (1998)
  • D. Bell et al.

    Unit rod segmental spinal instrumentation in the management of patients with progressive neuromuscular spinal deformity

    Spine

    (1989)
  • B. Ben-David

    Spinal cord monitoring

    Orthop Clin North Am

    (1988)
  • E. Bleck

    Orthopaedic Management in Cerebral Palsy

    (1987)
  • C. Bonnett et al.

    Thoracolumbar scoliosis in cerebral palsy

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1976)
  • D. Bradford

    Neuromuscular spinal deformity.

  • K. Bridwell et al.

    Posterior spinal fusion supplemented with only allograft bone in paralytic scoliosis

    Spine

    (1994)
  • P. Brook et al.

    Spinal fusion in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1996)
  • M. Broom et al.

    Spinal fusion augmented by Luque-rod segmental instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1989)
  • J. Brown et al.

    Paralytic spine deformity.

  • J. Brown et al.

    Late spinal deformity in quadriplegic children and adolescents

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1984)
  • W. Bulman et al.

    Posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy: A comparison of Luque rod and unit rod instrumentation

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1996)
  • W. Bunch

    The Milwaukee brace in paralytic scoliosis

    Clin Orthop

    (1975)
  • W. Bunch et al.
  • W. Cambridge et al.

    Scoliosis associated with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1987)
  • Y. Cotrel et al.

    New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery

    Clin Orthop

    (1988)
  • K. Crawford et al.

    Severe lumbar lordosis after dorsal rhizotomy

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1996)
  • R. DeWald et al.

    Anterior and posterior spinal fusion for paralytic scoliosis

    Spine

    (1979)
  • R. Dias et al.

    Surgical correction of spinal deformity using a unit rod children with cerebral palsy

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1996)
  • R. Dias et al.

    Revision spine surgery in children with cerebral palsy

    J Spinal Disord

    (1997)
  • J. Dubousset

    Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for paralytic neuromuscular spinal deformities with emphasis on pelvic obliquity.

  • J. Dubousset et al.

    The crankshaft phenomenon

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1989)
  • M. Ecker et al.

    Efficacy of spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery in patients with cerebral palsy

    J Spinal Disord

    (1996)
  • G. Evans et al.

    Functional classification and orthopaedic management of spinal muscular atrophy

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1981)
  • R. Ferguson et al.

    Considerations in the treatment of cerebral palsy patients with spinal deformities

    Orthop Clin North Am

    (1988)
  • R. Ferguson et al.

    Staged correction of neuromuscular scoliosis

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1983)
  • R. Ferguson et al.

    Same-day versus staged anterior-posterior spinal surgery in a neuromuscular scoliosis population: The evaluation of medical complications

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1996)
  • J. Fisk et al.

    Scoliosis in neuromuscular disease

    Orthop Clin North Am

    (1979)
  • A. Garrett et al.

    Paralytic scoliosis

    Clin Orthop

    (1961)
  • W. Gersoff et al.

    The treatment of scoliosis in cerebral palsy by posterior spinal fusion with Luque-rod segmental instrumentation

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1988)
  • D. Gibson et al.

    The management of spinal deformity in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy

    Orthop Clin North Am

    (1978)
  • J. Herring et al.

    Segmental spinal instrumentation

    Spine

    (1982)
  • E. Hoffman et al.

    Dystrophin: The protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus

    Cell

    (1987)
  • J. Hsu

    The natural history of spine curvature progression in the non-ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy patient

    Spine

    (1983)
  • R. Hunsacker et al.

    Cardiac function in Duchenne's muscular dystrophy: Results of a 10-year follow-up study and noninvasive tests

    Am J Med

    (1982)
  • O. Hutter

    The membrane hypothesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Quest for function evidence

    J Inherit Metab Dis

    (1992)
  • J. James

    Paralytic scoliosis

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1956)
  • D. Jevsevar et al.

    The relationship between pre-operative nutritional status and complications after an operation for scoliosis in patients who have cerebral palsy. [Published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1256, 1993.]

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1993)
  • L. Kurz et al.

    Correlation of scoliosis and pulmonary function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1983)
  • D. Law et al.

    The effects of protein calorie malnutrition on immune competence of the surgical patient

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1968)
  • J. Leong et al.

    Surgical treatment of scoliosis following poliomyelitis

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1981)
  • M. Letts et al.

    Soft Boston orthosis in management of neuromuscular scoliosis: A preliminary report

    J Pediatr Orthop

    (1992)
  • R. Loder et al.

    Spinal cord monitoring in patients with nonidiopathic spinal deformities using somatosensory evoked potentials

    Spine

    (1991)
  • J. Lonstein

    Cerebral palsy.

  • J. Lonstein et al.

    Operative treatment of spinal deformities in patients with cerebral palsy or mental retardation

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1983)
  • J. Lonstein et al.

    Neuromuscular spine deformities

    Inst Course Lect

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    Address reprint requests to Richard E. McCarthy, MD, Arkansas Spine Center, 500 South University, Suite 815, Little Rock, AR 72205

    *

    Arkansas Spine Center and Departments of Orthopaedics and Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas

    View full text