Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
Current ConceptsMaterial Properties and Composition of Soft-Tissue Fixation
Section snippets
Metals
Most bone anchors currently approved for clinical use are made of metal.1 The 2 most commonly used metals are stainless steel and titanium. Potential problems associated with metallic implants include migration and magnetic resonance imaging artifact. Metal anchors also remain permanently embedded in the bone, thereby limiting options for anchor placement during subsequent surgery. Metals are shiny or lustrous solid materials that are malleable and ductile yet very durable. The shiny and
Polymers
Polymer-based absorbable implants were first used in the early 1960s when American Cyanamid (Wayne, NJ) developed Dexon, a polyglycol material that was used as a resorbable suturing material.11 In the 1970s polymers for use as biomaterials in orthopaedics became popular because of the demand for biocompatibility and nontoxicity. Furthermore, because of the difficulties in imaging and revision surgery that metal implants posed, polymers were investigated. Polymers do not interfere with
Biocomposites
Biocomposites have the same advantages of polymers, such as ease of postoperative imaging16, 52 and revision surgery, with the added benefit of bone formation within the screw. A composite consists of 2 different materials, and those used in interference screws and suture anchors (Table 2) consist of a ceramic and polymer. All available implants consist of a bioabsorbable polymer and bioactive ceramic, but PEEK-ceramic composites are currently being investigated.50 Studies have shown good
Screw Geometry
Although attention must be given to material composition and biomechanical suitability, it is important to consider the screw geometry. This is especially important when comparing different studies, because some have suggested that screw geometry is a more important determinant of pullout strength than the type of material. Several studies have stressed the importance of various aspects of screw geometry, such as thread diameter,15, 76 core diameter, screw length,77 gap size,77, 78 buttress
Commercially Available Products
Companies producing interference screws and suture anchors were identified by contacting the operating room coordinators at local hospitals, checking articles for references to orthopaedic companies, and obtaining product pamphlets from exhibitors at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons annual meeting in February 2009. Each company was contacted, and information on available products was obtained from each company's Web site and sales representatives.
Implant Review
The review of commercially available implants found 33 metal suture anchors and 16 metal interference screws (Table 3). All of the available metal interference screws and 73% of suture anchors (24) are made of titanium alloys.
Table 1 outlines the available bioabsorbable and biostable polymers. For bioabsorbable polymers, pure PLLA was the most common in both interference screws (14 [74%]) and suture anchors (22 [55%]). The second most common material was PLGA for interference screws (3 [16%]),
Conclusions
Interference screws and suture anchors are commonly used for fixation of soft tissue to bone in arthroscopic surgery and sports medicine. Interference screws tightly sandwich the graft/tendon between the screw and the bone, whereas suture anchors attach soft tissue to an implant embedded in bone. Many implants are made from metals; however, the advancement of new polymers and composites has made the use of these materials more common (Table 5). In biceps tenodesis and ACL reconstruction,
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Arthrex for research support. They also thank the Arthrex, Stryker, Smith & Nephew, Biomet, ConMed Linvatec, Mitek, Zimmer, and ArthroCare sales representatives for assistance with product literature.
References (80)
- et al.
An ultrastructural characterization of the interface between bone and sputtered titanium or stainless steel surfaces
Biomaterials
(1986) - et al.
Residual aluminum oxide on the surface of titanium implants has no effect on osseointegration
Biomaterials
(2003) - et al.
The influence of BMP-2 and its mode of delivery on the osteoconductivity of implant surfaces during the early phase of osseointegration
Biomaterials
(2007) - et al.
Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation
Biomaterials
(2004) - et al.
Graft laceration and pullout strength of soft-tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: In vitro study comparing titanium, poly-d,l-lactide, and poly-d,l-lactide-tricalcium phosphate screws
Arthroscopy
(2006) - et al.
Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices
Biomaterials
(2000) - et al.
The use of anchors in shoulder surgery: A shift from metallic to bioabsorbable anchors
Arthroscopy
(2007) - et al.
Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery
Arthroscopy
(2009) Poly-D,L-lactide interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Arthroscopy
(2005)- et al.
Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation
Arthroscopy
(2004)