The effect of kyphoplasty parameters on the dynamic load transfer within the lumbar spine considering the response of a bio-realistic spine segment
Introduction
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) caused by osteoporosis are an increasingly common occurrence. The annual incidents of vertebral fractures in Europe among elderly (50–79) are estimated at 1.1% for women and 0.6% for men, while epidemiologic studies foresee an increase of these numbers in the future (EPOS, 2002). Approximately 85% of these fractures are due to primary osteoporosis and the remainder due to secondary osteoporosis or malignancies (Cooper et al., 1992). These VCFs lead to progressive sagittal spinal deformity and changes in spine biomechanics, as the adopted kyphotic posture of the patients displaces their centre of gravity reducing their overall stability (Overstall et al., 1977).
Balloon kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive surgical treatment for osteoporotic and osteolytic VCF with promising clinical potential, during which a filler material is percutaneously injected into a cavity of a degenerated vertebral body, created by an inflatable tamp. Next to reversing kyphosis, cemented augmentation also results in high local rigidity within a functional spine unite (FSU) and retrospective clinical studies have indicated new VCFs as a potential late sequela of the reinforcement procedures (Fribourg et al., 2004, Heaney, 1992). It remains however elusive whether this is the aetiology (Lindsay et al., 2001) or a symptomatic condition of the gradual loss of bone mineral density (BMD) due to evolving osteoporosis (Uppin et al., 2003).
The pathogenesis of fractures at adjacent non-treated spine levels has been heuristically investigated both in vitro (Berlemann et al., 2002, Boger et al., 2007) and in vivo (Fournol et al., 2007). Experimental studies are however conducted on FSU’s originating from different spine levels, age groups and varying surgical approaches and have thus been indicated as methodologically flawed (Hardouin et al., 2001). This hinders a collective evaluation of the existing literature, as different hypothesis and conclusions render it unclear whether these trends will hold true, once deducted to other patients. Finite element analysis (FEA) has been used to determine the in situ effect of cemented augmentation on the load transfer within a FSU (Polikeit et al., 2003), indicating increased pressure in the intervertebral disc (IVD) and deflection of the vicinal endplate, which could provoke subsequent fractures. The biomechanical alterations of ligaments however could not be reflected, as these were simulated by cable elements, capable of enduring tension only. Recent FEA continue to focus on the response of the adjacent vertebra considering motion segments of 3–5 vertebral bodies (Rohlermann et al., 2006) with ligamentous tissue either modelled by two nodal elements or neglected at all.
In this investigation a FEA of a bio-realistic lumbar (L1–L5) spine is introduced to compare the biomechanical response of its preoperative state to the postsurgical cemented augmentation, both for bony and connecting soft tissue. This approach is based on the preliminary hypotheses that cement injection exaggerates force transmission to the adjacent vertebral bodies, thereby predisposing those levels to future fractures. The effect of uni- and bi-pedicular filling with polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) was examined for loads encountered in diurnal activities.
Section snippets
Model development
A lumbar spine was scanned in its entirety by high resolution computed tomography (CT). Upon segmentation and reconstruction of the vertebral bodies, the interposing IVDs were reverse engineered based on the superior and inferior surfaces of the connecting vertebrae. The resulting model represents an evolution of a previously published FSU (Tsouknidas et al., 2012) simulated here with full solid ligamentous tissue.
The mesh grid was generated in ANSA (by BETA CAE Systems S.A.) in order to ease
Results
The analysis revealed that the load transfer to the non-augmented vertebrae was influenced by the PMMA injection only to one adjacent spine level and any effect to further apart vertebrae can be considered as insignificant. Therefore and in order to increase computational efficiency only L5–L3 were considered to determine the qualitative influence of cemented augmentation (in the L4) to one superior and one inferior spinal level.
In all cases the highest stress was recorded mid-stance,
Discussion
Based on the computed results a slight increase in the load transfer was observed in all treated models regardless of the patient’s BMD, as the stiffness characteristics of the healthy vertebra (untreated model) compare favourably to the osteoporotic reinforced ones. This can be attributed to the capacity of an intact vertebra to uniformly distribute developing stress over its entire volume (Wilson et al., 2000). Stating, however, that kyphoplasty increases the risk of fragility fractures in
Conclusions
The results of our study suggest that the biomechanical changes of the dynamic load transfer to the adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies after kyphoplasty are insignificant when compared to a healthy spine segment. This however does not consider the unfavorable effect of kyphosis itself and presumes, in our approach, an anatomy fully reversed to its physiological state.
With respect to literature data, kyphoplasty might predispose adjacent spine level to subsequent fractures, but it is likely
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge that this investigation was partially funded by the General Secretariat for Research and Technology of Greece under grant PE8(3227).
References (38)
The anatomy and pathophysiology of whiplash
Clin. Biomech.
(1986)- et al.
Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements
Clin. Biomech.
(2007) - et al.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty in symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: review of 50 patients
J. Radiol.
(2007) The validation of biodynamic models
Clin. Biomech.
(2001)- et al.
Should percutaneous vertebroplasty be used to treat osteoporotic fractures? An update
Joint Bone Spine
(2001) The frictional properties of animal joints
Wear
(1962)The biomechanics of running
Gait Posture
(1998)- et al.
Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations
Clin. Biomech.
(2005) - et al.
A non-linear finite element model of human L4–L5 lumbar spinal segment with three-dimensional solid element ligaments
Theor. Appl.
(2011) - et al.
The biomechanical effects of osteoporosis vertebral augmentation with cancellous bone granules or bone cement on treated and adjacent non-treated vertebral bodies: a finite element evaluation
Clin. Biomech.
(2010)
Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.
Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement
Eur. Spine J.
Cement distribution, volume, and compliance in vertebroplasty: some answers from an anatomy-based nonlinear finite element study
Spine
Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989
J. Bone Miner. Res.
J. Bone Miner. Res.
Evaluation of adjacent segment failure following vertebroplasty
Incidence of subsequent vertebral fracture after kyphoplasty
Spine
New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures
Spine
Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty
Rheumatology
Cited by (43)
The effect of bolus properties on muscle activation patterns and TMJ loading during unilateral chewing
2024, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsFrontier advances on biomechanical therapies
2023, Cartilage Tissue and Knee Joint Biomechanics: Fundamentals, Characterization and ModellingBiomechanical CT-computed bone strength predicts the risk of subsequent vertebral fracture
2023, BoneCitation Excerpt :Previous finite element studies demonstrated that the shift in spinal loads due to anterior shift of the upper body, increased cement insert stiffness, PMMA filling pattern and volume of bone cement lead to the increase of the stress on the end plates of the cemented vertebra, leading to the fractures in a vertebra adjacent to an augmented one [49,50]. However, some studies also showed that PKP does not increase the risk of SVF [51–53]. It should be pointed out that, similar to many in vivo BCT studies on fracture risk assessment [42,54,55], we focused solely on measuring BCT-strength of a single-level isolated non-fracture vertebral body without considering patient-specific loading conditions acting on it or individual surgical treatment-induced changes in spinal loading in particular.
Posterior spinal stabilization: A biomechanical comparison of Laminar Hook Fusion to a Pedicle Screw System
2022, Clinical BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :Orthotropy was considered as a vital part of the modelling approach, as osteoporosis has been documented to alter its anisotropy in favour of the principal loading direction as a response to intensified remodelling (Silva and Gibson, 1997). Endplate and pedicle properties were assumed as constant and isotropic throughout all scenarios, as the directional dependency of their mechanical strength is suppressed by their shell-like dimensions (Tsouknidas et al., 2013). To avoid structural complexity, the capsulary ligament was neglected and only the facet contact modelled instead.
Effect of facet inclination and location on TMJ loading during bruxism: An in-silico study
2022, Journal of Advanced ResearchAn in silico investigation of the effect of bolus properties on TMJ loading during mastication
2021, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Firstly, the used Mooney Rivlin Material is a rather simple representation of the mechanical behavior of the TMJ disc and more complex representation have been suggested in literature (Beek et al., 2003; Fazaeli et al., 2016; Labus et al., 2021). Secondly, measurements of in vivo tissue parameters for the TMJ disc and related structures are not possible and the patient-specific nature of our approach infers a rather large amount of anatomical variation, consequently one should not use the presented values as thresholds (Tsouknidas et al., 2013). The presented results should be seen as a comparative investigation of different food bolus parameters on the loading of the TMJ disc and are still relevant to inform clinical decisions regarding food bolus modifications for TMD patients.