Geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical spine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The inferior endplates on the middle-sagittal plane were classified into 3 types according to the location of the concave apex.

  • The inferior endplates on the specific coronal plane were classified into 3 types: concave, flat and irregular.

  • On the middle-sagittal plane, the inferior endplate concave depth from C2 to C7 were between 1.7 and 2.8 mm, showing no significant difference.

  • The average sagittal diameters of inferior endplate of females for each level were significantly smaller than those of males.

  • The average transverse diameters of inferior endplate had an increasing tendency from C2 to C7, especially C6 and C7 increasing the most.

Abstract

Objectives

Device subsidence is a well-known complication following cervical disc arthroplasty. Its occurrence has been closely tied with the endplate-implant contact interface. But current literature on the geometry of cervical endplate is very scarce. The aim of this anatomical investigation was to analyze geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical vertebrae, thereby identifying the common endplate shape patterns and providing morphological reference values consummating the design of the implant.

Patients and methods

Reformatted CT scans of 85 individuals were analyzed and endplate concave depth, endplate concave apex location, sagittal diameter of endplate, coronal concave angle, as well as transverse diameter of endplate were measured in mid-sagittal plane and specified coronal plane. According to the endplate concave apex location, the inferior endplates in mid-sagittal plane were classified into 3 types: type I with posteriorly positioned apex, type II with middle situated concave apex and type III with anteriorly positioned apex. Moreover, the inferior endplates in specified coronal plane were also classified into three types: concave, flat and irregular.

Results

Based on visual assessment, for the mid-sagittal plane, type I endplate accounted for 26.9% of all the 510 endplates of 85 individuals, while the proportion of type II and type III endplates were 53.9 and 19.2% respectively. For the specified coronal plane, 68.6% of all the 510 endplates were evaluated as concave, 26.9% as flat and the remaining 4.5% as irregular. Among all measured segments, C3 had the largest endplate concave depth values in mid-sagittal plane, while C7 the least; C5 and C6 had the largest sagittal endplate diameter values, while C2 the least. For each level, the sagittal endplate concave depth and endplate diameter of females were significantly smaller than those of males (P < 0.05). Among all measured segments, C7 had the least coronal concave angle. Gender did not influence coronal concave angle significantly (P > 0.05). Increasing from C2 to C7, the endplate transverse diameters of females were significantly smaller than those of males (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The exact shape and geometry of cervical endplate are crucial for the design and improvement of cervical disc prosthesis. Gender difference of sagittal and transverse diameters of cervical endplate should be given more attention when implanting a disc prosthesis. These endplate geometrical parameters should be taken into consideration when calculating most suitable geometric parameters of new disc prosthesis.

Introduction

Cervical disc replacement has been widely used in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc diseases. However, artificial cervical disc replacement may fail because of device-related complications, such as subsidence, heterotopic ossification, device wear and migration [1]. Subsidence is the most common complication following cervical disc arthroplasty with an incidence of 3–10% [1]. It is suggested that one desired artificial cervical disc should mirror the shape of both endplates of the same cervical segment in all three dimensions to gain a maximal contact area of the endplate-prosthesis interface [2]. Nevertheless, the endplate designs of those common cervical disc prostheses are oversimplified in contrast to the morphological complexity of vertebral endplates. That is to say, the profile of most currently available artificial cervical disc prostheses is limited to flat endplate or at the best minor convexity. This oversimplification of the design of cervical disc prosthesis would be bound to bring about insufficient contact area between endplate and disc prosthesis, finally resulting in subsidence of disc prosthesis.

The morphology of cervical endplate could have practical significance for cervical disc replacement. It has been demonstrated that endplate geometrics, such as the endplate concave angle and the sagittal or transverse diameter of endplate are crucial for artificial cervical disc design [3], [4]. Besides, endplate shape has been related with clinical outcomes of cervical disc replacement [5]. Thus, the exact shape and geometry of cervical vertebral endplate could be of important clinical significance in the design and improvement of cervical disc prosthesis.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the sagittal and coronal geometry of cervical inferior endplates from C2 to C7 by employing processed data digitized CT scans. These messages were used to describe the common cervical endplate shape and consummate the design of cervical disc prosthesis.

Section snippets

Patients

Eighty-five patients (average age 42 years, range 26–61 years) that underwent a cervical CT scans (Light Speed VCT, GE Healthcare, London, UK) were retrospectively selected from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). All the patients were scanned for head and neck symptoms and complained of no spinal problems. Scans with evidence of trauma, tumor, deformity or infection were excluded.

Images

All the CT scans images were imported into the Mimics 10.01 software to be multi-planar

Sagittal endplate shape

Based on visual assessment, for the MSP, type I endplate accounted for 26.9% of all the 510 endplates of 85 individuals, while the proportion of type II and type III endplates were 53.9% and 19.2% respectively. The proportion of different endplate shapes from C2 to C7 is present in Table 1.

Sagittal endplate concave depth (ECD)

Among all cervical segments, the inferior ECD values from C2 to C7 were between 1.7 and 2.8 mm, demonstrating no significant difference (P > 0.05, see Table 2). In addition, C3 had the largest mean value of ECD

Discussion

Device subsidence is a commonly reported complication following artificial disc arthroplasty, and it may also be the main cause resulting in the failure of artificial disc replacement [6], [7]. A small degree of subsidence may provide some benefits, including immediate stability of the instrumentation and promotion of biological fusion. However, when aggravated, it can result in loss of anterior column height, progressive deformity, and failure of the instrumentation [8], [9], [10].

Conclusions

The exact shape and geometry of cervical vertebral endplate are crucial for the design and improvement of cervical disc prosthesis. Gender difference of sagittal and transverse diameters of endplates should be given more attention when implanting a disc prosthesis. These endplate geometrical parameters should be taken into consideration when calculating most suitable geometric parameters of new implant.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Mechanical characterization of a novel biomimetic artificial disc for the cervical spine

    2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
  • Analysis of Functional Outcomes and Risk Factors for Facet Joint Distraction During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

    2022, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to the ROC analysis, we determined that the optimal cutoff threshold for CPD was 12.45 mm. It is noteworthy that in studies of the morphometry of the cervical endplate, the inferior endplate of the adjacent vertebral bodies is arc shaped, whereas the superior endplate of the adjacent vertebral bodies is flat.26,27 As shown by our study in Table 4, the ΔAIH is positively correlated with the CPD.

  • Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of cervical vertebral endplate anatomy: A systematic literature review

    2022, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    Specifically, for superior cervical endplates, Soo et al. [9] reported a significant relationship between gender and APD and TD (P < 0.01, R2 = 0.27–0.41) and that on average, superior cervical endplates in males were wider (in terms of TD) by 0.6 mm (P = 0.05) and deeper (in terms of APD) by 1.6 mm (P = 0.0001) than those in females. For inferior cervical endplates, males had significantly larger APDs for than females for C2 to C7 and larger TDs for C6 and C7, whilst no significant difference was detected between genders for TD from C2 to C5 [10]. Whilst Kim et al. [13] also identified a significant correlation between gender and cervical endplate diameters (P < 0.05), no significant correlation was found between endplate diameters and age.

  • Effects of New Cage Profiles on the Improvement in Biomechanical Performance of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

    2019, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Previous studies have noted that the fewer points for anterior screw fixation and the drawbacks of the conventional cage profile are the main implant-related factors that induce cage subsidence and subsequent instability.14,40,41 For a conventional cage, the small footprints on the end and the geometric mismatching between the domed end plate and flat end substantially reduce the contact area with the end plate, which results in a large stress concentration and facilitates cage subsidence.14,40,42 To address these issues, some cages with new profiles have been reported to be used for vertebral body reconstruction in single-level ACCF.16-18

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text