Geometry of inferior endplates of the cervical spine
Introduction
Cervical disc replacement has been widely used in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc diseases. However, artificial cervical disc replacement may fail because of device-related complications, such as subsidence, heterotopic ossification, device wear and migration [1]. Subsidence is the most common complication following cervical disc arthroplasty with an incidence of 3–10% [1]. It is suggested that one desired artificial cervical disc should mirror the shape of both endplates of the same cervical segment in all three dimensions to gain a maximal contact area of the endplate-prosthesis interface [2]. Nevertheless, the endplate designs of those common cervical disc prostheses are oversimplified in contrast to the morphological complexity of vertebral endplates. That is to say, the profile of most currently available artificial cervical disc prostheses is limited to flat endplate or at the best minor convexity. This oversimplification of the design of cervical disc prosthesis would be bound to bring about insufficient contact area between endplate and disc prosthesis, finally resulting in subsidence of disc prosthesis.
The morphology of cervical endplate could have practical significance for cervical disc replacement. It has been demonstrated that endplate geometrics, such as the endplate concave angle and the sagittal or transverse diameter of endplate are crucial for artificial cervical disc design [3], [4]. Besides, endplate shape has been related with clinical outcomes of cervical disc replacement [5]. Thus, the exact shape and geometry of cervical vertebral endplate could be of important clinical significance in the design and improvement of cervical disc prosthesis.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the sagittal and coronal geometry of cervical inferior endplates from C2 to C7 by employing processed data digitized CT scans. These messages were used to describe the common cervical endplate shape and consummate the design of cervical disc prosthesis.
Section snippets
Patients
Eighty-five patients (average age 42 years, range 26–61 years) that underwent a cervical CT scans (Light Speed VCT, GE Healthcare, London, UK) were retrospectively selected from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). All the patients were scanned for head and neck symptoms and complained of no spinal problems. Scans with evidence of trauma, tumor, deformity or infection were excluded.
Images
All the CT scans images were imported into the Mimics 10.01 software to be multi-planar
Sagittal endplate shape
Based on visual assessment, for the MSP, type I endplate accounted for 26.9% of all the 510 endplates of 85 individuals, while the proportion of type II and type III endplates were 53.9% and 19.2% respectively. The proportion of different endplate shapes from C2 to C7 is present in Table 1.
Sagittal endplate concave depth (ECD)
Among all cervical segments, the inferior ECD values from C2 to C7 were between 1.7 and 2.8 mm, demonstrating no significant difference (P > 0.05, see Table 2). In addition, C3 had the largest mean value of ECD
Discussion
Device subsidence is a commonly reported complication following artificial disc arthroplasty, and it may also be the main cause resulting in the failure of artificial disc replacement [6], [7]. A small degree of subsidence may provide some benefits, including immediate stability of the instrumentation and promotion of biological fusion. However, when aggravated, it can result in loss of anterior column height, progressive deformity, and failure of the instrumentation [8], [9], [10].
Conclusions
The exact shape and geometry of cervical vertebral endplate are crucial for the design and improvement of cervical disc prosthesis. Gender difference of sagittal and transverse diameters of endplates should be given more attention when implanting a disc prosthesis. These endplate geometrical parameters should be taken into consideration when calculating most suitable geometric parameters of new implant.
Conflicts of interest
None.
References (20)
- et al.
The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement
Spine J.
(2010) - et al.
Relationship between endplate morphology and clinical outcome of single-level lumbar disc arthroplasty
Spine J.
(2009) - et al.
Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence
Spine J.
(2005) - et al.
Vertebral fractures usually affect the cranial endplate because it is thinner and supported by less-dense trabecular bone
Bone
(2009) - et al.
Reducing subsidence risk by using rapid manufactured patient-specific intervertebral disc implants
Spine J.
(2012) - et al.
Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae endplates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2009) - et al.
Is there a difference in shape of the endplates in sagittal plane? A morphometric study of the lumbosacral spine (Abstract)
Spine J.
(2010) - et al.
Geometry of the intervertebral volume and vertebral endplates of the human spine
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
(2010) - et al.
Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc
J. Spinal Disord. Tech.
(2003) - et al.
Complications and reoperations of the SB Charite lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients
Eur. Spine J.
(2008)
Cited by (28)
Mechanical characterization of a novel biomimetic artificial disc for the cervical spine
2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsAnalysis of Functional Outcomes and Risk Factors for Facet Joint Distraction During Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
2022, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :According to the ROC analysis, we determined that the optimal cutoff threshold for CPD was 12.45 mm. It is noteworthy that in studies of the morphometry of the cervical endplate, the inferior endplate of the adjacent vertebral bodies is arc shaped, whereas the superior endplate of the adjacent vertebral bodies is flat.26,27 As shown by our study in Table 4, the ΔAIH is positively correlated with the CPD.
Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of cervical vertebral endplate anatomy: A systematic literature review
2022, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case ManagementCitation Excerpt :Specifically, for superior cervical endplates, Soo et al. [9] reported a significant relationship between gender and APD and TD (P < 0.01, R2 = 0.27–0.41) and that on average, superior cervical endplates in males were wider (in terms of TD) by 0.6 mm (P = 0.05) and deeper (in terms of APD) by 1.6 mm (P = 0.0001) than those in females. For inferior cervical endplates, males had significantly larger APDs for than females for C2 to C7 and larger TDs for C6 and C7, whilst no significant difference was detected between genders for TD from C2 to C5 [10]. Whilst Kim et al. [13] also identified a significant correlation between gender and cervical endplate diameters (P < 0.05), no significant correlation was found between endplate diameters and age.
Does preoperative inferior endplate morphology influence the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty at C5-C6 level: A retrospective study
2020, Clinical Neurology and NeurosurgeryEffects of New Cage Profiles on the Improvement in Biomechanical Performance of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis
2019, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :Previous studies have noted that the fewer points for anterior screw fixation and the drawbacks of the conventional cage profile are the main implant-related factors that induce cage subsidence and subsequent instability.14,40,41 For a conventional cage, the small footprints on the end and the geometric mismatching between the domed end plate and flat end substantially reduce the contact area with the end plate, which results in a large stress concentration and facilitates cage subsidence.14,40,42 To address these issues, some cages with new profiles have been reported to be used for vertebral body reconstruction in single-level ACCF.16-18