Long-Term Follow-Up Case SeriesRadiological Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients More Than 22 Years After Treatment
Introduction
Scoliosis affects 1% to 2% of the population, with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) the most common subgroup [1], [2]. It affects teenagers, mostly females, and is diagnosed from age 11 to 14 years, where growth in the spine is rapid. Untreated, AIS can progress to severe deformation of the spine, pulmonary impairment, back pain, and poor self-image [3].
Brace treatment [4] and surgical correction [5] are the only two treatments that have been shown to alter the natural history and progression of AIS. At Copenhagen University Hospital, brace treatment with Boston brace was initiated in curves within 30° to 50° with documented curve progression and remaining skeletal growth. The patients were instructed to wear the brace for 23 hours a day and were examined twice a year including posteroanterior x-ray by an orthopedic surgeon. If the curve had not progressed on 2 successive visits and the patient was judged skeletally mature based on the Risser sign [6], [7], brace weaning over a 6-month period was initiated. In patients where the Cobb angle exceeded 50°, surgical correction, fusion with Harrington–dorso-transverse traction (DTT) instrumentation was recommended, which was the standard of care at that time. Postoperatively, the patients were placed in a cast for a 12-month period.
To our knowledge, only a few studies have been published with more than 20 years of follow-up after AIS treatment [3], [5], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term radiologic outcomes, specifically curve progression and adjacent level degeneration, in AIS patients at a mean 25 years after treatment.
Section snippets
Methods
Patients diagnosed and treated with either a Boston brace or posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with Harrington-DTT instrumentation for AIS at Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, from 1983 to 1990 were identified. These patients were contacted and requested to return to the clinic for an interview and clinical examination, including assessment with health-related quality of life questionnaires. Two hundred nineteen patients were identified, among whom 104 were braced and 115 had a PSF. Of the
Results
One hundred fifty-nine patients participated in the radiologic follow-up (78%), 66 treated with Boston brace and 93 treated with PSF. Eleven patients refused x-ray examination because they were pregnant at the time of examination or because they had a history of breast or other cancers, and were thereby excluded from this study. Eight patients had emigrated out of Denmark and were not available for follow-up, two are deceased because of cardiac arrest and breast cancer and four patients were
Discussion
Although treatment for AIS is prophylactic, aimed at the prevention of curve progression and its associated consequences such as impaired pulmonary function and lumbar degeneration, there are very few studies looking at the long-term outcomes of AIS treatment [3], [5], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. In our cohort of AIS patients treated with a Boston brace, there was no clinically relevant progression of the curve from prebracing to completion of bracing. This is to be expected, as the goal of
Conclusion
In this cohort with an average follow-up of 25 years, with 78% available for follow-up, both the braced and surgically treated patients had a very small degree of curve progression, with a small incidence of PJK, distal segment degeneration, and reoperation. Although the criterion standard for AIS treatment has evolved in the past 25 years, it is our experience that AIS patients treated with either Boston brace or Harrington-DTT instrumentation will preserve the correction achieved for at least
References (15)
- et al.
Voluntary school screening for scoliosis in Minnesota
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(1982) - et al.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in twins, a population based survey
Spine
(2010) Natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a tool for guidance in decision of surgery of curves above 50°
J Child Orthop
(2013)- et al.
Effect of bracing in adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis
N Engl J Med
(2013) - et al.
Back pain and function 22 years after brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study—part I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
(2003) The iliac apophysis; an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis
Clin Orthop
(1958)- et al.
Risser sign inter-rater and intra-rater agreement: is the Risser sign reliable?
Skeletal Radiol
(2009)
Cited by (12)
Minimum 20-Year Health-Related Quality of Life and Surgical Rates After the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
2019, Spine DeformityCitation Excerpt :Because of the lack of nationalized health care linked to a common identification number, it is difficult to achieve high rates of follow-up in the US for pediatric orthopedic conditions. Although Simony et al.’s series from Denmark reports 78% follow-up at a mean of 24.5 years, no childhood radiographs were available for review, and childhood measurements were based on chart review [32,33]. Danielsson et al. achieved very high follow-up rates at minimum 20 years after scoliosis treatment in Sweden [19,20].
Selective Thoracic Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Long-Term Radiographic and Functional Outcomes*
2018, Spine DeformityCitation Excerpt :This principle was further discussed by Lenke in the new classification system of Lenke 1B and 1C curve patterns [2]. Spontaneous lumbar curve correction has been observed with an STF, and short-term results have shown curve correction maintenance [3-7], with long-term studies including STF cases in the review of the outcome of fusion for AIS [8,9]. There are three long-term studies of STF cases with a span of 7–20 years that report good outcomes [3,10,11].
Defining “successful” treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review
2023, European Spine JournalUltralong Follow-Up of Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Harrington Instrumentation vs Uninstrumented Fusion
2022, International Journal of Spine Surgery
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Southern Denmark, Datatilsynet and was conducted at the Section for Spine Surgery and Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Ostre Hougvej 55, 5000 Middelfart, Denmark.
This study was funded by the Danish Rheumatism Association, Fonden af 17-12-1981, Erik Birger Christensen Fund and AP Møllers Fund.