Original contribution
The clinical usefulness of preoperative dynamic MRI to select decompression levels for cervical spondylotic myelopathy,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2010.03.038Get rights and content

Abstract

The study subjects included 54 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent a selective laminoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups according to the number of decompressed levels: two levels, three levels and four or five levels. The number of cord compressions at every intervertebral level was determined in the flexion, neutral, and extension position using a dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in consideration of both static and dynamic compressions. For each group, the clinical outcomes were evaluated. Moreover, the patients were divided into two groups according to their age. Then, the appearance ratios of cord compression between the neutral and extension position were compared at each intervertebral level. The clinical outcomes were satisfactory. There were no statistical differences among the three groups, except for the age and operation time. The position of the neck influenced the number of cord compressions. The appearance ratios of cord compression, which were especially prominent at C2/3, C3/4 and C4/5, showed high scores in the aged. The preoperative dynamic MRI scan was clinically useful. In the aged, attention should be given to C2/3, C3/4 and C4/5.

Introduction

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common disease of the spinal cord that occurs during and after middle age. It has been thought that static and dynamic compressions to the spinal cord were responsible for CSM. It has been reported that static compressions were caused by hypertrophy of the ligamentum flavum, disk protrusion, osteophyte formation, and congenital canal stenosis [1], [2], and that dynamic compressions were attributed to infolding of the ligamentum flavum and canal stenosis by vertebrolisthesis [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

Conventional laminoplasty for CSM has been the widely accepted method to release a compressed spinal cord. This approach was originally developed about 30 years ago, and follow-up studies have shown excellent long-term results [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. This technique has made it possible to shift the decompressed spinal cord posteriorly and to release the static and dynamic compressions [19], [20], [21]. After this operative treatment, however, some postoperative problems remained such as persistent axial pain, malalignment, restricted neck motion and C5 palsy [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Several laminoplasty techniques have been developed to prevent these problems [9], [11], [14], [16], [17], [18]. In 2002, the method of selective laminoplasty (Shiraishi method) was described [27], [28]. This procedure did not decompress from C3 to C7, but selectively decompressed the intervertebral levels. However, there have so far been no reports demonstrating how to determine the exact levels to be decompressed.

Regarding dynamic stenosis, various authors have reported on the use of plain radiographic or myelographic studies [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Recently, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have been performed to define the physiological changes that occur in the subarachnoid space and cervical cord during flexion and extension of the neck [29], [30], [31]. However, the application of the dynamic MRI for clinical decision-making has not yet been reported. We have selected the levels requiring decompression with a preoperative dynamic MRI, in consideration of both the static and dynamic compressions, and herein reported on the utility of preoperative dynamic MRI. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical merit of the preoperative dynamic MRI for CSM, and to evaluate the intervertebral levels which caused dynamic stenosis by age bracket (Un64: 64 years and under, and Ov65: 65 years and over).

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Between March 2003 and December 2006, 54 patients (33 males and 21 females), who suffered from CSM, underwent selective laminoplasty at our hospital. Patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, rheumatoid arthritis and developmental canal stenosis were excluded from this study. Also, patients with cervical instability or abnormalities in alignment on flextion-extension X-rays were excluded. The mean age of the patients at the time of operation was 65.4 years (range, 48-89

Results

Group A consisted of 11 patients (nine males and two females), Group B, eight patients (one male and seven females), and Group C, 35 patients (23 males and 12 females). The mean age was 58.3 years in Group A, 69.3 years in Group B and 66.7 years in Group C. As for the mean age of patients, Group A was the youngest among them. There were statistical differences both between Group A and B (P value; .019) and between Group A and C (P value; .015). The mean operation time was 67 min per level in

Discussion

Since Hirabayashi and his coworker reported on the open-door laminoplasty for CSM at 1983 [10], there have been numerous operative methods designed to minimize the damage to the posterior extensor mechanism of the cervical spine [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Although the MRI scan has dramatically improved the diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of spinal disorders, the conventional operation for CSM has been performed extensively, entailing as it does the

Conclusions

The preoperative dynamic MRI, especially in the extension position, revealed the levels which should be decompressed for CSM. As for the aged patients, attention to C2/3, C3/4 and C4/5 should be necessary.

References (32)

  • ShiraishiT.

    Skip laminectomy. A new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving bilateral muscular attachments to the spinous processes: a preliminary report

    Spine J

    (2002)
  • IkuoM.

    The importance of the sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal in relation to spondylosis and myelopathy

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1974)
  • VincentC.H. et al.

    Developmental stenosis of the cervical spinal canal: radiological considerations

    Neurologly.

    (1964)
  • FehlingsM.G. et al.

    A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury

    Spine

    (1998)
  • FukuiK. et al.

    Pathomechanism, pathogenesis and results of treatment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by dynamic canal stenosis

    Spine

    (1990)
  • HayashiH. et al.

    Etiologic factors of myelopathy: a radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine

    Clin Orthop

    (1987)
  • PenningL.

    Some aspects of plain radiography of the cervical spine in chronic myelopathy

    Neurology

    (1962)
  • PenningL. et al.

    Biomechanical aspects of spondylotic myelopathy

    Acta Radiol

    (1966)
  • HaseH. et al.

    Bilateral open laminoplasty using ceramic laminas for cervical myelopathy

    Spine

    (1991)
  • HidaiY. et al.

    Treatment of cervical myelopathy with a new dorsolateral decompressive procedure

    J Neurosurg

    (1999)
  • HirabayashiK. et al.

    Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy

    Spine

    (1983)
  • HosonoN. et al.

    En bloc laminoplasty without dissection of paraspinal muscles

    J Neurosurg

    (2005)
  • ItohT. et al.

    Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine

    Spine

    (1985)
  • KimuraI. et al.

    Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1995)
  • O'BrienM.F. et al.

    A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization: a computerized morphometric analysis

    Spine

    (1996)
  • SatomiK. et al.

    Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy

    Spine

    (1994)
  • Cited by (25)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The manuscript submitted dose not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

    ☆☆

    No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

    View full text