Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 15, Issue 9, 1 September 2015, Pages 2009-2015
The Spine Journal

Clinical Study
Modified partial pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.047Get rights and content

Abstract

Background context

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is the most commonly recommended technique for the correction of local post-traumatic thoracolumbar deformity; however, the surgical results are not always satisfactory because the possibly damaged upper disc is preserved, and all the posterior elements are resected.

Purpose

The aim was to compare the results of standard PSO and modified PSO in the treatment of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis.

Study design

This was a retrospective multicenter comparative clinical study.

Patient sample

A total of 86 patients were included in the final analysis.

Outcome measures

The outcome measures included local Cobb angle of the kyphosis, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) score.

Methods

The upper disc was resected, and the inferior wall of the index pedicle and the lower facet joint were preserved in the modified PSO. Patients with focal kyphosis greater than 30° who were treated with one-level osteotomy, without the presence of spine neoplasm, infection, or previous surgery, were included. The measurements included the VAS score, ODI score, and preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles.

Results

Forty-two patients in the modified PSO group and 44 in the standard PSO group were included in the final analysis. The mean surgical time and blood loss were similar between the two groups. Both the VAS and ODI scores had improved significantly at the final follow-up in the two groups. The mean Cobb angle significantly improved from 39.6° to 5.6° in the modified PSO group and from 39.1° to 4.8° in the standard PSO group, with no significant difference between the two groups preoperatively or at the final follow-up.

Conclusions

The modified PSO provides an alternative method with which to correct kyphotic deformity in patients with post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis.

Introduction

Evidence & Methods

The authors present a retrospective review of results of their modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) technique as compared to conventional PSO. Their technique involves resection of the proximal endplate with preservation of the inferior wall of the pedicle and the inferior aspect of the facet joint.

The authors' review their results in 42 cases and compare short-term outcomes to 44 patients treated using conventional PSO. Comparable outcomes and perioperative measures are reported between the two groups.

The authors' results should not be surprising as their modification is unlikely to impact most perioperative metrics. As a retrospective review of a limited sample, subject to selection, indication and possibly information bias, this study should be viewed as providing Level IV evidence.

—The Editors

Late post-traumatic kyphosis is the most common sequela of spinal column fractures, developing most commonly after flexion-compression-type fractures. Late kyphotic deformity is thought to be caused by progressive wedging of the vertebral body and weakness of the posterior osseous-ligamentous complex. The thoracolumbar junction from T11 to L2 is the most commonly involved area of the spine [1]. Surgery is recommended for patients with significant pain or progressive neurologic deficits, with a sagittal index of 20° being the cutoff value for surgical intervention. The main aim of surgical treatment for kyphotic deformity is to restore the normal sagittal balance and release the neural structures to improve pain and neurologic symptoms [2].

Since 1945, many surgical procedures have been proposed for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis [3]. The correction angle, potential risks, and suitable indications are different for different types of osteotomies. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is the most commonly recommended technique to correct local post-traumatic thoracolumbar deformity because it does not lengthen the anterior column and potentially reduces the need for an anterior procedure [4]. However, the surgical results are not always satisfactory because the potentially damaged upper disc is preserved, and all the posterior elements are resected during this procedure.

Therefore, we developed a modified PSO in which the upper disc is resected, and the inferior wall of the index pedicle and the lower facet joint are preserved. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical results of modified PSO and standard PSO for the correction of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis. Our hypotheses were as follows: the correction of the focal kyphotic deformity would be nearly identical in the two groups; improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores would be identical; blood loss and surgical time would be equal in both the groups; complications would be substantial in both the groups; and the need for anterior surgery would be identical in both the groups.

Section snippets

Subjects and study design

This study was a retrospective, multicenter (three centers) study. Between January 2010 and December 2011, a total of 44 patients underwent modified PSO, and 45 patients underwent standard PSO for late post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis. The inclusion criterion was one-level osteotomy for the treatment of symptomatic kyphosis. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with focal thoracolumbar kyphosis greater than 30° due to a previous vertebral body fracture (time interval≥6 months) were included. The

Patient characteristics

Two patients in the modified PSO group and one in the standard PSO group were lost to follow-up postoperatively; thus, there were 86 patients included in the final analysis. Demographic data are shown in Table 1. The mean age at the time of surgery was 46.9±6.2 years (range 32–58 years), and 65.1% of the patients were males. The levels of the osteotomy were T11 (n=5), T12 (n=29), L1 (n=42), and L2 (n=10). The mean time interval between injury and surgery was 31.4±17.9 months (range 6–84

Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of modified PSO in the treatment of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis by comparing it with standard PSO. We determined in this study that the modified PSO yielded similar results with respect to clinical and radiologic outcomes as the standard PSO. The improvement in the VAS, ODI, and focal Cobb angle was not significantly different between the two groups, and there were no severe complications in either group, similar surgical

References (24)

  • J.A. Gruskay et al.

    Methods of evaluating lumbar and cervical fusion

    Spine J

    (2014)
  • A.R. Vaccaro et al.

    Post-traumatic spinal deformity

    Spine

    (2001)
  • E. Munting

    Surgical treatment of post-traumatic kyphosis in the thoracolumbar spine: indications and technical aspects

    Eur Spine J

    (2010)
  • M.N. Smith-Petersen et al.

    Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthritis

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1945)
  • K.J. Cho et al.

    Comparison of Smith-Petersen versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance

    Spine

    (2005)
  • Q. He et al.

    Transpedicular closing wedge osteotomy in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar kyphotic deformity with different etiologies

    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

    (2013)
  • Y.M. Xi et al.

    Correction of post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis using pedicle subtraction osteotomy

    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

    (2013)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Modified posterior closing wedge osteotomy for the treatment of posttraumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis

    J Trauma

    (2011)
  • J.W. Brantigan et al.

    A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients

    Spine

    (1993)
  • A.J. Schoenfeld et al.

    Posttraumatic kyphosis: current state of diagnosis and treatment: results of a multinational survey of spine trauma surgeons

    J Spinal Disord Tech

    (2010)
  • E. Thomasen

    Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (1985)
  • N. Kawahara et al.

    Closing-opening wedge osteotomy to correct angular kyphotic deformity by a single posterior approach

    Spine

    (2001)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Partial Hemivertebra Resection (Grade 4 Osteotomy) for Congenital Scoliosis: A Comparison with Radical Hemivertebra resection

      2019, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, less invasive surgical strategy, instead of radical HV resection, may be better indicated for patients with relatively moderate deformity. Grade 4 osteotomy, defined by Schwab et al.5 in 2014, was recently used in patients with posttraumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis with satisfactory correction.6,15 Shi et al.7 reported 38 patients with congenital kyphosis following grade 4 osteotomy, demonstrating its excellent utility in moderate kyphosis.

    • SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy for congenital thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of 2 years follow-up study

      2018, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is noteworthy that, although the Grade 4 osteotomy was literarily defined in 2014 by Schwab et al. [9], this particular surgical strategy has been earlier practically applied in our scoliosis center since 1999. Initially, the Grade 4 osteotomy was used for the treatment of late-onset kyphosis secondary to thoracolumbar burst fracture by vertebral shortening, and satisfying clinical outcomes were confirmed by previous studies [17,18]. Similarly, we believe that the SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy should also be suitable for patients with CK, particularly for those with moderate deformities.

    • Malunion of post-traumatic thoracolumbar fractures

      2018, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Initial correction of the deformity combined with decompression will prevent the development of syringomyelia [26]. The goal of surgery is to alleviate the patients’ pain and improve their function [23,27–32] while correcting the deformity [33]. However, it is very difficult to make treatment recommendations based on the literature.

    • Does restoration of focal lumbar lordosis for single level degenerative spondylolisthesis result in better patient-reported clinical outcomes? A systematic literature review

      2017, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, it is critical to determine whether this will have any impact on patient-reported quality of life outcomes [5]. Surgical restoration of sagittal balance and spinopelvic angulation has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes in spinal fusions involving multiple levels [6,7]. The optimal treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis, however, remains controversial.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.

    Author disclosures: RG: Nothing to disclose. JW: Nothing to disclose. WY: Nothing to disclose. CY: Nothing to disclose. FP: Nothing to disclose. XZ: Nothing to disclose.

    JW and RG contributed equally to this work.

    View full text