Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 16, Issue 11, November 2016, Pages 1377-1383
The Spine Journal

Clinical Study
Risk factors for surgical site infection in elective routine degenerative lumbar surgeries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Background Context

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most serious complications of spine surgery. Its predisposing factors, especially in routine surgeries, are less reported. However, a number of patient- and procedure-related risk factors could be avoided or at least determined preoperatively. Moreover, the patient-specific risk for SSI could be estimated before the elective surgery.

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to analyze the preoperatively determinable risk factors for SSI in patients who require elective routine surgery related to lumbar disc degeneration and to build a multivariable model for the individual risk prediction.

Study Design

Analysis of prospectively collected standardized clinical data and the validation of the results on an independent prospective cohort were performed.

Patient Sample

One thousand thirty (N=1,030) patients were included in the study. All subjects underwent primary lumbar single- or two-level decompression, microdiscectomy, or instrumented fusion.

Outcome Measures

Occurrence of an SSI defined according to the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines that required surgical or nonsurgical therapy.

Methods

The effect of preoperative patient characteristics, comorbidities, disease history, and invasiveness of the elective surgery on the risk of SSI was determined in uni- and multivariate logistic regression models in the test cohort (N=723). The performance of the final multivariable regression model was assessed by measuring its discriminative ability (c-index) in receiver operating characteristic analysis. Performance of the multivariable risk estimation model was tested on the validation (N=307) cohort.

Results

The prevalence of SSI was 3.5% and 3.9% in the test and in the validation cohorts, respectively. The final multivariable regression model predictive (p=.003) for SSI contained the patient's age, body mass index (BMI), and the presence of 5 comorbidities, such as diabetes, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmia, chronic liver disease, and autoimmune disease as risk factors. The c-index of the model was 0.71, showing good discriminative ability, and it was confirmed by the data of the independent validation cohort (c=0.72).

Conclusions

Predisposing factors for SSI were older age, higher BMI, and the presence of certain comorbidities in the present study. The cumulative number of risk factors significantly associated with the increasing risk for an SSI (p<.0001). Our model needs further validation but it may be used for individual risk assessment and reduction in the future.

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs), defined as a hospital-acquired infection of the skin, soft tissue, or bone, are one of the most serious complications of spine surgery, increasing morbidity [1], mortality [2], unfavorable surgical outcomes [3], length of hospital stays, and costs [4], [5]. Spinal SSIs can be superficial (above the fascia) or deep (below the fascia). Spondylitis, discitis, spondylodiscitis, and epidural abscessare always defined as deep infections. Diagnosis of an SSI, which is based on signs and symptoms, laboratory and radiologic imaging findings, and microbiologic tests [6], and its management can be challenging for both clinician and patient.

Evidence & Methods

Surgical site infections are some of the most frequent and problematic complications following spine surgery. The authors attempt to devise a scoring system that may be able to inform the risk of surgical site infection preoperatively.

This study used a test and validation cohort design. In total, over 1,000 patients were included in the analysis. A number of risk factors were identified that are commensurate with other works in the literature. The discriminative capacities of the final models were moderate in nature.

The prognostic utility presented in this work may have the capacity to better identify patients who are at risk of surgical site infection. The number of measures included may make this a cumbersome tool and the fact that this was a single-center study should not lead to surprise that experience in the first cohort was comparable to that of the validation group. Differences in socio-demographic composition or the means by which surgical site infections are diagnosed and treated between this cohort and centers where the results are to be applied may impair translation. As the authors recognize, further validation studies in other clinical settings are necessary. As a result, this study presents Level III evidence.

The Editors

The prevalence of spinal SSI is reported to be between 0.7% and 12%, depending on the type of the surgery and the studied population [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. A number of patient- and procedure-specific risk factors have been identified, such as age, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, previous spinal surgery; higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, perioperative transfusion, extended procedure, postsurgical incontinence (bowel, bladder, or both), and duration of hospital stay [7], [8], [9]. However, most of these studies focused on specific spine surgery patient groups, such as adults with spinal deformities, and they applied only simplified study designs and analyses. Furthermore, only a few studies reported on the occurrence of SSIs in the general population of spine surgery patients, including those undergoing routine elective procedures. Therefore, a validated presurgical risk estimation of spinal SSIs is important to identify at-risk patients and to reduce risk.

The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of SSI, in a cohort of patients after elective routine, primary degenerative lumbar surgeries, and to identify measurable presurgical risk factors. By using a multivariable statistical approach, we built a predictive model, and then we validated it by comparing with data collected from a subsequently studied independent cohort.

Section snippets

Cohorts

Data were collected prospectively from consecutive adults (above the age of 18 years old) who underwent elective surgery for lumbar disc degeneration at one or two levels at a tertiary spine center. Data from patients undergoing either acute intervention because of neurological emergency or because of revision surgery were excluded.

Surgeries were done by board-certified orthopedics or neurosurgeons who did only spine surgeries. Surgical procedures included microdiscectomy, decompression, and

SSIs in the study cohorts

Demographics and details of surgical procedures are represented in Table 1. Medical comorbidities and their prevalence are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Of the 723 eligible patients in the test cohort, 25 had spinal SSIs; and of the 307 eligible patients in the validation cohort, 12 had spinal SSIs (Fig. 1). Of the 37 SSIs, 25 (70%) were superficial. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus were the most frequent pathogens (Table 2). There were two polymicrobial infection

Discussion

The present study identifies the preoperatively determinable risk factors for an SSI after elective, routine degenerative lumbar surgery. Our final multivariable predictive model was built utilizing the patient's age, BMI, and the presence of five comorbidities (arrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, systemic immune disease, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and chronic liver disease). The prognostic power of the model was validated on the dataset of an independent prospective cohort.

Surgical

References (42)

  • K.L. Chaichana et al.

    Risk of infection following posterior instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease in 817 consecutive cases

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2014)
  • M.A. Olsen et al.

    Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (2008)
  • S.K. Mirza et al.

    Development of an index to characterize the “invasiveness” of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time

    Spine

    (2008)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Surveillance for Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Events

    (2014)
  • T.S. Kollégium

    Szeptikus folyamatok kezelése a végtagsebészetben. Egészségügyi Közlöny

    (2008)
  • K.S. Kaye et al.

    The effect of surgical site infection on older operative patients

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2009)
  • M.J. McGirt et al.

    Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients

    J Neurosurg Spine

    (2011)
  • W.P. Weber et al.

    Economic burden of surgical site infections at a European university hospital

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2008)
  • J.A. Urban

    Cost analysis of surgical site infections

    Surg Infect (Larchmt)

    (2006)
  • I. Collins et al.

    The diagnosis and management of infection following instrumented spinal fusion

    Eur Spine J

    (2008)
  • M. Ishii et al.

    Postoperative deep surgical-site infection after instrumented spinal surgery: a multicenter study

    Global Spine J

    (2013)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Limiting morbidity in neuromodulation

      2022, Essential Neuromodulation
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.

    Author disclosures: IK: Nothing to disclose. AL: Nothing to disclose. ZS: Nothing to disclose. AB: Nothing to disclose. PE: Nothing to disclose. PPV: Nothing to disclose.

    The authors have no conflict of interests.

    1

    The first two authors contributed equally to this article.

    View full text