Clinical StudyComparison of S2-Alar and traditional iliac screw pelvic fixation for pediatric neuromuscular deformity
Introduction
Progressive neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) can compromise the ability of non-ambulatory pediatric patients to comfortably seat in a wheelchair and tolerate activities of daily living. Spinal fusion with instrumentation to the pelvis is used to correct and stabilize the spinal deformity, level pelvic obliquity, and improve sitting balance. Since the development of the Luque-Galveston technique in 1984, numerous pelvic constructs have been described with various short to mid-tem success rates [1], [2], [3], [4]. In the current era of spinal instrumentation, modular iliac screws have become widely used as they have eliminated the need for the technically demanding three-dimensional Galveston rod bending and offer greater pull-out strength than smooth rod fixation [5]. The S2-Alar (S2A) screw fixation technique has more recently been developed and uses a more medial starting point than traditional iliac screws. The alteration in starting point obviates the need for offset connectors to connect to the primary rods, potentially improving the implant profile of the construct and limiting soft tissue dissection [2], [6], [7].
Although S2A fixation has theoretical benefits for wound management and implant stability, there are sparse data comparing the radiographic and clinical outcomes of this pelvic construct with the more traditional iliac screw method in a pediatric neuromuscular population [8]. The current study examines the clinical and radiographic outcomes of pediatric patients with NMS treated with either standard iliac screws (SISs) or S2A constructs.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
This study was approved by the Connecticut Children's Institutional Review Board. A single institution, retrospective chart and radiograph review was performed of all patients who underwent spinal instrumentation between November 2003 and October 2014. Inclusion criteria consisted of age between 8 and 20 years of age, diagnosis of NMS, Gross Motor Function Classification System Level 4 or 5, received posterior spinal instrumentation with extension to the pelvis using SIS or S2A technique, and
Demographics
A total of 68 NMS patients underwent posterior spinal fusion to the pelvis during the study period, and 50 of these patients met inclusion criteria. Nine patients were excluded for incomplete follow-up of less than 1 year, and the remainder was excluded for incomplete medical records. Twenty-nine patients were male (58%) and 21 were female (42%), with an average age of 14.0 years at surgery (range 9.8–19.6) and an average length of follow-up of 3 years (range 1–10 years) (Table 1). Twenty-eight
Discussion
The surgical management of NMS remains challenging, given the high overall postoperative complication rates for this population and the technical difficulty of extending a long spinal construct into the pelvis, which has been identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity [11]. The choice of pelvic fixation has demonstrated notable variability throughout literature and has changed over time. More modern variations of the pelvic fixation concept have stressed modular
Conclusion
In summary, S2A screws were generally found to offer lower IF rates when compared with SISs, without conferring an advantage in correction of the main Cobb angle or in decreasing postoperative complications. However, IF rates are equivalent when S2A screws are compared with iliac screws with a single cross-link at any point in the construct. Although S2A fixation has gained popularity, modular iliac screws remain a viable option and may offer the same clinical outcomes in a pediatric NMS
References (16)
- et al.
Predicting failure of iliac fixation in neuromuscular spine deformity
Spine Deform
(2014) - et al.
Neuromuscular scoliosis: hybrid fixation and iliac screw modification of Luque–Galveston technique
Oper Tech Orthop
(2009) - et al.
The Galveston technique of pelvic fixation with L-rod instrumentation of the spine
Spine
(1984) - et al.
Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation
Spine
(2009) - et al.
Biomechanical assessment of conventional unit rod fixation versus a unit rod pedicle screw construct: a human cadaver study
Spine
(2004) - et al.
An anatomic study of the S2 iliac technique for lumbopelvic screw placement
Spine
(2009) - et al.
Pelvic fixation in adult and pediatric spine surgery: historical perspective, indications, and techniques: AAOS Exhibit Selection
J Bone Joint Surg Am
(2015) - et al.
A comparison of early clinical and radiographic complications of iliac screw fixation versus S2 Alar iliac (S2AI) fixation in the adult and pediatric populations
J Spinal Disord Tech
(2015)
Cited by (33)
Comparison of Complications and Revisions After Sacral 2 Alar Iliac Screw and Iliac Screw Fixation for Sacropelvic Fixation in Pediatric and Adult Populations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2019, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :A previous meta-analysis28 including 5 comparative studies found that S2AI screw fixation in adults has a significantly lower mechanical failure and complication rate than does IS fixation. However, this meta-analysis did not consider fixation in other diseases (e.g., neuromuscular scoliosis or pediatric scoliosis) and other relevant outcomes such as complications,3,20,29 publication bias, and sources of heterogeneity (e.g., age, sex, disease, and level of fixation) were not assessed. The risk bias assessment for comparative studies was not assessed.
Sacropelvic Fixation: A Comprehensive Review
2019, Spine Deformity
FDA device/drug status: Approved (pedicle/modular screws used in the pediatric spine/sacrum).
Author disclosures: MCL: Nothing to disclose. CJ: Nothing to disclose. MJS: Nothing to disclose. JT: Nothing to disclose.
There was no funding associated with this study, and there are no conflicts of interest.
The current study received IRB approval from Connecticut Children's Medical Center.