Evid Based Spine Care J 2012; 3(4): 41-53
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328142
Systematic review
© AOSpine International Stettbachstrasse 6 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland

Surgical versus injection treatment for injection-confirmed chronic sacroiliac joint pain

William Ryan Spiker
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Brandon D Lawrence
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
Annie L Raich
2   Spectrum Research Inc, Tacoma, WA, USA
,
Andrea C Skelly
2   Spectrum Research Inc, Tacoma, WA, USA
,
Darrel S Brodke
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 February 2013 (online)

ABSTRACT

Study design: Systematic review.

Study rationale: Chronic sacroiliac joint pain (CSJP) is a common clinical entity with highly controversial treatment options. A recent systematic review compared surgery with denervation, but the current systematic review compares outcomes of surgical intervention with therapeutic injection for the treatment of CSJP and serves as the next step for evaluating current evidence on the comparative effectiveness of treatments for non-traumatic sacroiliac joint pain.

Objective or clinical question: In adult patients with injection-confirmed CSJP, does surgical treatment lead to better outcomes and fewer complications than injection therapy?

Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published between 1970 and June 2012. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify studies evaluating surgery or injection treatment for injection-confirmed CSJP. Studies involving traumatic onset or non-injection–confirmed CSJP were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed the level of evidence quality using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

Results: We identified twelve articles (seven surgical and five injection treatment) meeting our inclusion criteria. Regardless of the type of treatment, most studies reported over 40% improvement in pain as measured by Visual Analog Scale or Numeric rating Scale score. Regardless of the type of treatment, most studies reported over 20% improvement in functionality. Most complications were reported in the surgical studies.

Conclusion: Surgical fusion and therapeutic injections can likely provide pain relief, improve quality of life, and improve work status. The comparative effectiveness of these interventions cannot be evaluated with the current literature.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Ashman B, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT. 2010; Chronic sacroilac joint pain: fusion versus denervation as treatment options. EBSJ 1 (3) 35-44
  • 2 Al-Khayer A, Hegarty J, Hahn D et al. 2008; Percutaneous sacroiliac joint arthrodesis: a novel technique. J Spinal Disord Tech 21 (5) 359-363
  • 3 Buchowski JM, Kebaish KM, Sinkov V et al. 2005; Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint. Spine J 5 (5) 520-528 discussion 529
  • 4 Haufe SM, Mork AR. 2005; Sacroiliac joint debridement: a novel technique for the treatment of sacroiliac joint pain. Photomed Laser Surg 23 (6) 596-598
  • 5 Khurana A, Guha AR, Mohanty K et al. 2009; Percutaneous fusion of the sacroiliac joint with hollow modular anchorage screws: clinical and radiological outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 (5) 627-631
  • 6 Schutz U, Grob D. 2006; Poor outcome following bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion for degenerative sacroiliac joint syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg 72 (3) 296-308
  • 7 Waisbrod H, Krainick JU, Gerbershagen HU. 1987; Sacroiliac joint arthrodesis for chronic lower back pain. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106 (4) 238-240
  • 8 Wise CL, Dall BE. 2008; Minimally invasive sacroiliac arthrodesis: outcomes of a new technique. J Spinal Disord Tech 21 (8) 579-584
  • 9 Chakraverty R, Dias R. 2004; Audit of conservative management of chronic low back pain in a secondary care setting—part I: facet joint and sacroiliac joint interventions. Acupunct Med 2 (4) 207-213
  • 10 Hawkins J, Schofferman J. 2009; Serial therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections: a practice audit. Pain Med 10 (5) 850-853
  • 11 Kim WM, Lee HG, Jeong CW et al. 2010; A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain. J Altern Complement Med 16 (12) 1285-1290
  • 12 Lee JH, Lee SH, Song SH. 2010; Clinical effectiveness of botulinum toxin A compared to a mixture of steroid and local anesthetics as a treatment for sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Med 11 (5) 692-700
  • 13 Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, Plastaras CT et al. 2001; Fluoroscopically guided therapeutic sacroiliac joint injections for sacroiliac joint syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80 (6) 425-432
  • 14 Work Loss Data Institute 2011 Hip and pelvis (acute and chronic). Available at www.guideline.gov
  • 15 Work Loss Data Institute 2011 Low back: lumbar and thoracic (acute and chronic). Available at www.guideline.gov
  • 16 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2010; Practice guidelines for chronic pain management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Anesthesiology 112 (4) 810-833
  • 17 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Practice Guidelines Committee 2007. Low back disorders: occupational medicine practice guidelines: evaluation and management of common health problems and functional recovery in workers. Elk Grove Village, IL: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM);
  • 18 Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C et al. 2006; European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl. 02) S192-300
  • 19 Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S et al. 2007; Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 10 (1) 7-111
    • REFERENCES EDITORIAL PERSPECTIVE

    • 1 Ashman B, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT. 2010; Chronic sacroilac joint pain: fusion versus denervation as treatment options. EBSJ 1 (3) 35-44
    • 2 Dreyfuss P, Michaelsen M, Pauza K et al. 1996; The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 (22) 2594-2602
    • 3 Dreyfuss P, Dreyer SJ, Cole A et al. 2004; Sacroiliac joint pain. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12 (4) 255-265