Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spinal instability in ankylosing spondylitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Unstable spinal lesions in patients with ankylosing spondylitis are common and have a high incidence of associated neurological deficit. The evolution and presentation of these lesions is unclear and the management strategies can be confusing. We present retrospective analysis of the cases of ankylosing spondylitis developing spinal instability either due to spondylodiscitis or fractures for mechanisms of injury, presentations, management strategies and outcome.

Materials and Methods

In a retrospective analysis of 16 cases of ankylosing spondylitis, treated surgically for unstable spinal lesions over a period of 12 years (1995-2007); 87.5% (n=14) patients had low energy (no obvious/trivial) trauma while 12.5% (n=2) patients sustained high energy trauma. The most common presentation was pain associated with neurological deficit. The surgical indications included neurological deficit, chronic pain due to instability and progressive deformity. All patients were treated surgically with anterior surgery in 18.8% (n=3) patients, posterior in 56.2% (n=9) patients and combined approach in 25% (n=4) patients. Instrumented fusion was carried out in 87.5% (n=14) patients. Average surgical duration was 3.84 (Range 2-7.5) hours, blood loss 765.6 (± 472.5) ml and follow-up 54.5 (Range 18-54) months. The patients were evaluated for pain score, Frankel neurological grading, deformity progression and radiological fusion. One patient died of medical complications a week following surgery.

Results

Intra-operative adverse events like dural tears and inadequate deformity correction occurred in 18.7% (n=3) patients (Cases 6, 7 and 8) which could be managed conservatively. There was a significant improvement in the Visual analogue score for pain from a pre-surgical median of 8 to post-surgical median of 2 (P=0.001), while the neurological status improved in 90% (n=9) patients among those with preoperative neurological deficit who could be followed-up (n =10). Frankel grading improved from C to E in 31.25% (n=5) patients, D to E in 12.5% (n=2) and B to D in 12.5% (n=2), while it remained unchanged in the remaining - E in 31.25% (n=5), B in 6.25% (n=1) and D in 6.25% (n=1). Fusion occurred in 11 (68.7%) patients, while 12.5% (n=2) had pseudoarthrosis and 12.5% (n=2) patients had evidence of inadequate fusion. 68.7% (n=11) patients regained their pre-injury functional status, with no spine related complaints and 25% (n=4) patients had complaints like chronic back pain and deformity progression. In one patient (6.2%) who died of medical complications a week following surgery, the neurological function remained unchanged (Frankel grade D). Persistent back pain attributed to inadequate fusion/ pseudoarthrosis could be managed conservatively in 12.5% (n=2) patients. Progression of deformity and pain secondary to pseudoarthrosis, requiring revision surgery was noted in one patient (6.2%). One patient (6.2%) had no neurological recovery following the surgery and continued to have nonfunctional neurological status.

Conclusion

In ankylosing spondylitis, the diagnosis of unstable spinal lesions needs high index of suspicion and extensive radiological evaluation Surgery is indicated if neurological deficit, two/three column injury, significant pain and progressive deformity are present. Long segment instrumentation and fusion is ideal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun J, Bollow M, Remlinger G, Eggens U, Rudwaleit M, Distler A, et al. Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLAB27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:58–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Linden SM, Valkenburg HA, de Jongh BM, Cats A. The risk of developing ankylosing spondylitis in HLA-B27 positive individuals: A comparison of relatives of spondylitis patients with the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:241–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vosse D, Feldtkeller E, Erlendsson J, Geusens P, van der Linden S. Clinical vertebral fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 2004;31:1981–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hitchon PW, From AM, Brenton MD, Glaser JA, Tomer JC. Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine complicating ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg 2002;97:218–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Donnelly S, Doyle DV, Denton A, Rolfe I, McCloskey EV, Spector TD. Bone mineral density and vertebral compression fracture rates in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 1994;53:117–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Kilgore JE. Neurological complications of ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg 1993;78:871–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Osgood CP, Abbasy M, Mathews T. Multiple spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis. J Trauma 1975;15:163–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell P, Unsworth A, Haslock I. The effect of exercise on ankylosing spondylitis: A preliminary study. Br J Rheumatol 1993;32:498–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper C, Carbone L, Michet CJ, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Fracture risk in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A population based study. J Rheumatol 1994;21:1877–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox MW, Onofrio BM. Ankylosing spondylitis. Principles of Spinal Surgery. In: Menezes AH, Sonntag VK, editors. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996. p. 735–50.

  11. Graham GP, Evans PD. Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Injury 1991;22:426–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grisolia A, Bell RL, Peltier LF. Fractures and dislocations of the spine complicating ankylosing spondylitis. A report of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967;49:339–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunter T, Dubo HI. Spinal fractures complicating ankylosing spondylitis. A long-term follow-up study. Arthritis Rheum 1983;26:751–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowed DW. Management of cervical spinal cord injury in ankylosing spondylitis: The intervertebral disc as a cause of cord compression. J Neurosurg 1992;77:241–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein PR, Karpman RR, Gall EP, Pitt M. Spinal cord injury, spinal fracture, and spinal stenosis in ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg 1982;57:609–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nikolaisen C, Nossent H. Early histology in ankylosing spondylitis related spondylodiscitis supports its inflammatory origin. Scand J Rheumatol 2005;34:396–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Agarwal AK, Reidbord HE, Kraus DR, Eisenbeis CH Jr. Variable histopathology of discovertebral lesion (spondylodiscitis) of ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1990;8:67–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu PC, Fang D, Ho EK, Leong JC. The pathogenesis of extensive discovertebral destruction in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;230:154–61.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia 1969;7:179–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hitchon PW, Tomer JC, Haddad SF, Follett KA. Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 1998;49:619–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983;8:817–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hitchon PW. Instability of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization. In: Hitchon PW, Traynelis VC, Rengachary SS, editors. New York: Thieme; 1995. p. 240–7.

  23. Taggard DA, Traynelis VC. Management of cervical spinal fractures in ankylosing spondylitis with posterior fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2035–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo ZQ, Dang GD, Chen ZQ, Qi Q. Treatment of spinal fractures complicating ankylosing spondylitis. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2004;42:334–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Olerud C, Frost A, Bring J. Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 1996;5:51–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siddharth A. Badve.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badve, S.A., Bhojraf, S.Y., Nene, A.M. et al. Spinal instability in ankylosing spondylitis. IJOO 44, 270–276 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.65151

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.65151

Key words

Navigation