Skip to main content
Log in

How do physicians talk with their patients about risks?

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To describe the communication about risk between community-based physicians and their patients, the authors audiotaped 160 physician-patient encounters in the private practices of 19 physicians. Coding was done using a structured scheme to identify the presence of talk about risk of future illness, and to describe its characteristics. Patient understanding and satisfaction were assessed through an interview. Risk discussion occurred in 26% (95% CI 19%–33%) of the visits, quantitatively in two cases and specifically with respect to outcome in 48% (95% CI 40%–56%) of the visits. The patients initiated only 16% of this discussion but were, in general, satisfied with their care and the information they had received, but they had poor recall of the specifics of the discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Forrow L, Taylor WC, Arnold RM. Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med. 1992;92:121–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Naylor DC, Chen E, Strauss B. Measured enthusiasm: does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness? Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:916–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tape TG, Wigton RS. Medical students and residents’ estimates of cardiac risk. Med Decis Making. 1989;9:170–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Siminoff LA. Cancer patient and physician communication: progress and continuing problems. Ann Behav Med. 1989;11:108–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences of alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1259–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Johansen S, Wahrenberger JW, Ross JM. The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:43–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McNeil BJ, Weichselbaum R, Pauker SG. Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1978;299:1397–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Siminoff LA, Fetting JH. Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: impact of framing adjuvant breast cancer decisions. Med Decis Making. 1989;9:262–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Siminoff LA, Fetting JH, Abeloff MD. Doctor-patient communication about breast cancer adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1192–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. National Research Council. Improving risk communication. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Travis CB, Phillippi RH, Tonn BE. Judgment heuristics and medical decisions. Patient Educ Counseling. 1989;13:211–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berger ES, Hendee WR. The expression of health risk information. Arch Intern Med. 1989;14:1507–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stefanek M. Counseling women at high risk for breast cancer. Oncology. 1990;4(1):27–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kong A, Barnett OMGO, Mosteller F, Youtz C. How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:740–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Life and death in the fast lane [editorial]. New York Times. 1989;Oct 7:E22.

  16. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987;236:280–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Teversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mazier DJ. Why the goals of informed consent are not realized: on informed consent for the primary care physician. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:370–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was carried out while Drs. Kalet and Roberts were fellows in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalet, A., Roberts, J.C. & Fletcher, R. How do physicians talk with their patients about risks?. J Gen Intern Med 9, 402–404 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02629523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02629523

Key words

Navigation