Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2011 3
2012 2
2013 1
2014 2
2015 4
2016 6
2017 9
2018 9
2019 7
2020 14
2021 14
2022 29
2023 17
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Similar articles for PMID: 37903516

101 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Chan AK, Bisson EF, Bydon M, Glassman SD, Foley KT, Potts EA, Shaffrey CI, Shaffrey ME, Coric D, Knightly JJ, Park P, Wang MY, Fu KM, Slotkin JR, Asher AL, Virk MS, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Guan J, Haid RW, Mummaneni PV. Chan AK, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722. Neurosurg Focus. 2019. PMID: 31042655
Surgical outcomes of patients who fail to reach minimal clinically important differences: comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Ayling OGS, Rampersaud YR, Dandurand C, Yuan PHS, Ailon T, Dea N, McIntosh G, Christie SD, Abraham E, Bailey CS, Johnson MG, Bouchard J, Weber MH, Paquet J, Finkelstein J, Stratton A, Hall H, Manson N, Thomas K, Fisher CG. Ayling OGS, et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Apr 15:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2022.2.SPINE211210. Online ahead of print. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022. PMID: 35426818
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK, Bydon M, Bisson EF, Glassman SD, Foley KT, Shaffrey CI, Potts EA, Shaffrey ME, Coric D, Knightly JJ, Park P, Wang MY, Fu KM, Slotkin JR, Asher AL, Virk MS, Michalopoulos GD, Guan J, Haid RW, Agarwal N, Park C, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. Chan AK, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22602. Neurosurg Focus. 2023. PMID: 36587409
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV, Bisson EF, Kerezoudis P, Glassman S, Foley K, Slotkin JR, Potts E, Shaffrey M, Shaffrey CI, Coric D, Knightly J, Park P, Fu KM, Devin CJ, Chotai S, Chan AK, Virk M, Asher AL, Bydon M. Mummaneni PV, et al. Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188. Neurosurg Focus. 2017. PMID: 28760035
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O, Carr K, Thompson P, Hoang K, Darlington T, Perez E, Fatemi P, Gottfried O, Cheng J, Isaacs RE. Adogwa O, et al. World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19. World Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 25535070
101 results