The influence of sex on clinical outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar decompression

MT Nolte, NW Jenkins, JM Parrish, S Mohan… - International Journal of …, 2021 - ijssurgery.com
Background: Research focused on postoperative outcomes among men and women
undergoing minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD) spine surgery is sparse …

Influence of Self-Identified Gender on Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis

KC Jacob, MR Patel, GJ Park, MA Ribot, AW Parsons… - World Neurosurgery, 2022 - Elsevier
Objective We compared the patient-reported outcomes (PROs), minimal clinically important
difference (MCID) achievement, and perceived postoperative satisfaction after minimally …

Risk factors for failing to reach a minimal clinically important difference following minimally invasive lumbar decompression

EDK Cha, CP Lynch, CE Geoghegan… - International Journal of …, 2022 - ijssurgery.com
Background Clinically important postoperative changes can be best evaluated through the
minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Our study aims to evaluate risk factors …

Improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients 80 years or older compared with younger age groups

P Shahi, J Song, S Dalal, D Melissaridou… - … of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2022 - thejns.org
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive
lumbar decompression in patients≥ 80 years of age and compare them with those of …

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression—the surgical learning curve

J Ahn, A Iqbal, BT Manning, S Leblang, DD Bohl… - The Spine Journal, 2016 - Elsevier
Abstract Background Context Minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) procedures carry an
inherently difficult learning curve based upon anecdotal evidence. Few studies have …

Improvements in back and leg pain after minimally invasive lumbar decompression

DH Massel, BC Mayo, DV Patel, DD Bohl… - HSS Journal …, 2020 - journals.sagepub.com
Background Few studies have quantified clinical improvement following minimally invasive
lumbar decompression based on predominant back pain or leg pain. Purpose To quantify …

Multilevel minimally invasive lumbar decompression: clinical efficacy and durability to 2 years

R Khanna, H Malone, KM Keppetipola… - International journal of …, 2021 - ijssurgery.com
Background: The clinical efficacy of single-level minimally invasive lumbar decompression
and/or microdiscectomy is well established, with improved postoperative functional outcome …

The influence of presenting physical function on postoperative patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lumbar decompression

KC Jacob, MR Patel, GA Park, JR Gheewala… - Clinical Spine …, 2023 - journals.lww.com
Study Design: The study of retrospective cohort. Objective: The aim was to compare patient-
reported outcome measures (PROMs), satisfaction, and minimum clinically important …

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression—the surgical learning curve

CW Kim - The Spine Journal, 2016 - thespinejournalonline.com
Minimally invasive lumbar decompression—the surgical learning curve Page 1
Commentary Minimally invasive lumbar decompression—the surgical learning curve Choll …

Safety and efficacy of revision minimally invasive lumbar decompression in the ambulatory setting

BP Hirsch, B Khechen, KL Cardinal, JA Guntin, K Singh - Spine, 2019 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. A retrospective analysis. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate
differences in perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing revision minimally …