Innovative One-Hole Split Endoscopy for Posterior Atlantoaxial Lateral Mass Joint Fusion: Technical Details and Preliminary Clinical Application

  • International Journal of Spine Surgery
  • April 2026,
  • 20
  • (2)
  • 178-185;
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/8851

Abstract

Background Posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis is a cornerstone of atlantoaxial instability or dislocation. Open surgery entails extensive soft-tissue dissection, with intraoperative blood loss and postoperative axial pain. Experience from other spinal procedures suggests that one-hole split endoscopy may address these limitations; however, evidence at the craniovertebral junction is lacking.

Surgical Technique This study introduces an innovative, minimally invasive technique for atlantoaxial fusion: one-hole split endoscopy for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion. By delineating the anatomic layers, safety boundaries, and technical points, the technique enables endoscopic lateral mass joint arthrodesis and atlantoaxial screw fixation.

Clinical Application A 12-year-old boy with diagnosed atlantoaxial instability and os odontoideum underwent the one-hole split endoscopy for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion. Early postoperative imaging confirmed anatomic reduction of the joint with stable fixation. At 3 months, computed tomography revealed continuous bony bridging across the lateral mass joint space, indicating early osseous fusion.

Conclusion This study describes the first clinical application of posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion using one-hole split endoscopy, demonstrating clinical feasibility and enhanced visualization and suggesting a potential role for endoscopic fusion at the craniovertebral junction.

Clinical Relevance This technique offers an innovative, minimally invasive option for posterior atlantoaxial fusion and supports the broader application of endoscopic procedures at the craniovertebral junction.

Level of Evidence 4.

Introduction

Atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (AAI/D) is a craniovertebral anatomical instability disorder that may result in irreversible neurological deficits and potentially fatal outcomes if left untreated.1 The unique anatomical configuration of the atlantoaxial region allows the vertebral bodies to avoid directly bearing the weight of the head, with mechanical loads transmitted through the lateral masses of C1 and C2, making the stability of the lateral mass joints essential for maintaining physiological function.2 Posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis, exemplified by the Goel-Harms technique, has become the standard treatment for AAI/D.3 However, its requirement for extensive muscular dissection is associated with significant morbidity.4,5 This highlights the need for novel techniques that maintain biomechanical stability while minimizing surgical complications.6,7

In recent years, endoscopic spinal surgery has been increasingly adopted for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar decompression and fusion.8,9 Techniques such as full endoscopy, one-hole split endoscopy, and unilateral biportal endoscopy have shown clinical outcomes comparable to conventional open procedures but with lower complication rates achieved primarily by precise anatomical identification and meticulous hemostasis.10–12

Although anterior and posterior endoscopic procedures have been applied to the management of various cervical spine disorders,13 no study to date has explored posterior endoscopic techniques for AAI/D. To address this gap, we present the first application of the one-hole split endoscopy for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion (OSE-PALF) to elucidate its technical advantages and clinical feasibility.

Surgical Technique

Surgical Indications

Radiological assessment provides the objective basis for the diagnosis of AAI/D, with emphasis on anatomical integrity and joint congruency.1,14 Anterior dislocation is the most prevalent form, defined as an atlantodental interval (ADI) greater than 3 mm in adults and 5 mm in children. In contrast, posterior or rotational dislocations may present with normal ADI but abnormal congruency of the lateral mass joints.15,16 Surgical intervention is indicated in symptomatic patients to prevent neurological decline.17 Preoperative evaluation should exclude tumors, infections, acute fractures, congenital craniovertebral anomalies, and prior atlantoaxial surgery. Essential imaging includes dynamic cervical radiographs to assess alignment and reducibility, computed tomography (CT) with 3-dimensional reconstruction for deformity and dislocation severity, CT angiography for vertebral artery course, and magnetic resonance imaging for neurological pathology.18–20

Anatomic Layers and Safety Corridors

Preoperative mastery of the regional anatomic layers, together with precise delineation of the safe corridor, is critical to surgical safety and procedural reproducibility. The surface projection of the C1/C2 lateral mass joint lies within the paramedian suboccipital region, approximately 1.5 to 2.0 cm lateral to the midline. From superficial to deep, the approach proceeds through the skin/superficial fascia, trapezius, splenius capitis, semispinalis capitis, deep fat layer, and obliquus capitis inferior, which directly overlies the C1 posterior arch, the C2 lamina, and the lateral mass joint (Figure 1A). The longitudinal fiber orientation in this region facilitates blunt dissection. The occipital nerve typically courses in the deep fat layer and ascends deep to the semispinalis capitis. The C2 nerve root and its venous plexus are situated at the cranial margin of the lateral mass joint capsule, while the vertebral artery ascends posterolateral to the joint (Figure 1B).

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the anatomic layers for OSE-PALF. (A) In the paramedian suboccipital region, sequential dissection of the trapezius (blue triangle), splenius capitis (black triangle), semispinalis capitis (green triangle), and the deep fat layer exposes the deeper obliquus capitis inferior (yellow triangle) and rectus capitis posterior major (red triangle). The C1 to C2 lateral mass joint (red arrow) typically lies anterior to the obliquus capitis inferior, with the C1 posterior arch cranially and the C2 lamina caudally. The C2 nerve root and venous plexus course through the interval between the obliquus capitis inferior and the lateral mass joint capsule (yellow arrow). (B) After cranial retraction of the obliquus capitis inferior together with the C2 nerve root and surrounding venous plexus, the capsule and articular space of the C1 to C2 lateral mass joint are exposed. OSE-PALF, one-hole split endoscopy for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion.

The endoscopic dissection should be strictly confined: medially and cranially, the C2 laminar isthmus and the C1 posterior arch serve as bony boundaries to spare the suboccipital nerve and the muscles; laterally, the lateral edge of the facet defines a danger boundary to guard against vertebral artery injury. Guided by the layered anatomy, establishing the working corridor through fluoroscopic localization, channel dilation, and subperiosteal dissection can enhance the safety and accuracy of endoscopic navigation.

Positioning and Traction

To facilitate intraoperative localization, position the patient prone on a Jackson table with the head secured in a Mayfield headrest. Administer cranial traction under general anesthesia and maintain it throughout the procedure. Adjust the traction weight based on the degree of atlantoaxial joint reduction, not exceeding one-fifth of the patient’s body weight.

Surgical Approach and Corridor Creation

Prior to endoscopic navigation, localize the C1/C2 segment under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance and accurately position a localizing needle at the C2 laminar isthmus (Figure 2A). Along the posterior cervical midline, make a 2.5- to 3.0-cm longitudinal skin incision, then expose the trapezius-splenius capitis plane approximately 1.5 cm lateral to the midline. Along the direction of the muscle fibers, separate the trapezius, splenius capitis, and semispinalis capitis muscles using a blunt-tipped guiding rod. Stop advancing once the guide rod contacts the C2 lamina and recheck the placement under fluoroscopy (Figure 2B). Establish the working channel with soft-tissue dilators, insert the endoscopic system and instrument arm, and then initiate low-pressure continuous irrigation to maintain visual clarity.

Figure 2

Schematic illustration of surgical approach and fluoroscopic localization for OSE-PALF. (A) With C-arm fluoroscopy, the C1 to C2 segment and the C2 laminar isthmus (yellow triangle) are localized. With reference to the C1 to C2 level, a 2.5- to 3.0-cm longitudinal skin incision (red line) is made along the posterior cervical midline. (B) Insert a blunt-tipped guide rod to expand the soft tissue corridor, then securely dock it on the bony surface of the C2 lamina under fluoroscopic guidance. OSE-PALF, one-hole split endoscopy for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion.

Endoscopically, expose the C2 laminar isthmus cortex to ensure reliable localization. Perform subperiosteal dissection along the C2 isthmus toward the cranial side to reveal the predetermined bony boundaries and prevent unnecessary dissection. Mobilize the suboccipital muscles cranially together with the C2 nerve root and venous plexus with a blunt nerve dissector, avoiding prolonged sharp retraction or compression. For venous plexus bleeding, perform brief, low-power, punctate bipolar coagulation; for cortical oozing, apply bone wax or hemostatic materials.

Atlantoaxial Lateral Mass Joint Fusion

Intraoperative real-time fluoroscopy combined with endoscopic navigation ensures precise localization and anatomical delineation (Figure 3A). Excise the joint capsule with electrocautery, then use the high-speed spherical burr to debride hypertrophic bone and optimize joint space exposure (Figure 3B–D). Abrade the articular surfaces to expose the subchondral bone with a 2-mm spherical burr. Keep the burr continuously visible to avoid excessive depth and injury to the retropharyngeal soft tissues (Figure 3E).

Figure 3

Intraoperative images of OSE-PALF. (A) Precise localization of the lateral mass joint under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance. (B) Clear endoscopic visualization of the C2 isthmus and joint capsule. (C) Lateral mass joint visible after retraction of the C2 nerve root and joint capsule. (D) Close-up view showing the joint space and C1 lateral mass facet. (E) Endoscopic grinding of the lateral mass articular surface with a spherical burr. (F) Insert allograft cancellous bone into the joint space using a graft rod. (G) Direct visualization of successful lateral mass joint graft fusion. (H) Confirmation of the implant position and atlantoaxial reduction with intraoperative fluoroscopy. OSE-PALF, one-hole split endoscopy for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion.

After exposing the fresh bony surface, graft the allogeneic cancellous bone granules (size about 2–5 mm) into the joint space using a bone-graft cannula system (Figure 3F). Hold the cannula flush against the joint, thereby preventing graft spillage into blind areas and shielding the C2 nerve root and venous plexus. Furthermore, monitor the graft volume to promote joint fusion and avoid excessive distraction (Figure 3G). In most cases, unilateral lateral mass joint fusion is sufficient to maintain atlantoaxial stability; if necessary, bilateral fusion can be performed to enhance biomechanical symmetry. The Supplementary Video demonstrates the key steps of the fusion procedure.

Atlantoaxial Screw Fixation

Subsequently, we perform atlantoaxial internal fixation through the original midline incision. Establish bilateral subfascial working corridors: the fusion side through the preexisting arthrodesis channel, and the contralateral side with a minimally invasive intermuscular approach. On the fusion side, under endoscopic guidance, set the screw entry point at the C2 lateral mass center and insert a pedicle screw. For the C1, set the entry point at the junction of the posterior arch and the lateral mass, then insert a lateral mass screw. On the contralateral side, bluntly separate the trapezius, splenius capitis, and semispinalis capitis muscles, then retract the obliquus capitis inferior and rectus capitis posterior to expose the screw entry points. Insert the C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws in the same manner. During screw placement, apply real-time C-arm fluoroscopy to evaluate the insertion angle and depth, ensuring accurate trajectory and preventing neurovascular injury.

To avoid denervation of the suboccipital muscles, adopt intermuscular blunt dissection rather than fiber transection. Enter the suboccipital region through the trapezius-splenius capitis interval and preserve deep fat to protect the greater occipital nerve. Restrict dissection in the suboccipital triangle to prevent injury to the suboccipital nerve and vertebral artery.

Finally, remove the cranial traction device, insert prebent titanium rods, apply compression to the bilateral screw-rod system, and then complete fixation (Figure 3H). Before closure, perform adequate hemostasis and clear residual bone debris; place a drainage tube on the fusion side if needed.

Clinical Application: Report of Case

This study was approved by the institutional Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardians.

Case Presentation and Evaluation

A 12-year-old boy with diagnosed AAI and os odontoideum presented with neck pain, impaired grip, and gait instability. With disease progression, he developed urinary difficulty, limb weakness, and ambulatory impairment, without respiratory distress or urinary incontinence. Neurological examination revealed sensory abnormalities below the shoulders, increased muscle tone, hyperreflexia, and positive pathological signs. Baseline scores: visual analog scale, 5; Japanese Orthopedic Association, 6; Neck Disability Index, 57%.

Cervical radiographs showed anterosuperior displacement of the C2 body, with osseous separation from the odontoid process. The ADI remained normal, and C3 to C7 morphology and alignment were preserved (Figure 4A and B). Dynamic radiographs showed marked anterior translation of the atlas anterior arch relative to the C2 body during flexion. In extension, the translation largely resolved, with a mild posterior shift (Figure 4C and D). CT and angiography demonstrated the dens remaining below McRae’s line and anterolateral displacement of the C1 lateral mass relative to the C2, with no high-riding, ectopia, or tortuosity of the vertebral artery (Figure 4F–J). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed craniovertebral junction compression with intramedullary signal change and without Chiari malformation or syringomyelia (Figure 4E).

Figure 4

Preoperative cervical images of the pediatric patient with atlantoaxial instability. (A and B) X-ray images show anterior-superior displacement of C2 vertebra and odontoid separation. (C and D) Dynamic x-ray images indicate the significant instability of atlantoaxial joint. (E) Magnetic resonance image reveals compression at the craniovertebral junction with intramedullary signal changes. (F–H) Computed tomography scans show the os odontoideum, not extending beyond McRae’s line, with normal atlantodental interval. (I and J) Three-dimensional reconstructions indicate malalignment of the lateral mass joint, with no abnormalities of the vertebral artery.

Clinical Efficacy

The patient underwent the OSE-PALF, supported by a perioperative management protocol (see online Supplementary Material). The operation proceeded smoothly without major complications, with 4 axial screws (3.5 mm diameter, 20 mm length) inserted, an operative time of approximately 120 minutes, and an estimated blood loss of 30 mL.

Postoperatively, the child exhibited marked improvement in somatosensory function, and limb strength recovered to grade 4+ with independent ambulation. No surgery-related complications such as dysphagia or dyspnea occurred. Imaging confirmed atlantoaxial joint reduction, well-positioned instrumentation, and satisfactory graft fusion (Figure 5A–D). Postoperative scores: visual analog scale, 2; Japanese Orthopedic Association, 13 (improvement rate, 63.6%); Neck Disability Index, 25.7%.

Figure 5

Postoperative and follow-up computed tomography images of OSE-PALF. Multiplanar images demonstrate that precise screw placement (A and B), atlantoaxial reduction achieved with no spinal canal stenosis (C), and the bone graft within joint space (D). Three-month follow-up showed stabilization of the internal fixation device (E), no spinal cord compression is observed (F), and formation of the continuous bony bridge visible within the joint space (G and H). OSE-PALF, one-hole split endoscopy for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion.

Follow-up and Outcomes

At the 6-month follow-up, the child’s pain symptoms had completely resolved, with restoration of independent ambulation. Bladder function had returned to normal, although mild somatic sensory deficits persisted. CT with 3-dimensional reconstruction demonstrated stable atlantoaxial instrumentation without screw loosening or breakage (Figure 5E–F). Continuous osseous bridging across the atlantoaxial lateral mass joint space indicated early fusion (Figure 5G–H). No signs of osteolysis or bone resorption were observed at the fusion site. The patient wore a cervical orthosis for 3 months, and no complications occurred.

Discussion

In the present study, we successfully performed the OSE-PALF in a 12-year-old boy with AAI without intraoperative conversion or neurovascular injury. In open surgery, extensive soft tissue dissection and muscle attachment disruption often result in axial neck pain and functional decline.21,22 In this case, intraoperative observation showed that the endoscopic visualization could maintain a stable operative field and clearly delineate the atlantoaxial lateral mass joint and safety margins, thereby supporting precise joint preparation and targeted hemostasis, reducing the risk of neurovascular injury, and minimizing unnecessary soft-tissue dissection.23,24 To our knowledge, this is the first application of posterior endoscopic techniques for atlantoaxial fusion. Operative time and blood loss were well controlled, and postoperative imaging demonstrated stable fixation with osseous bridging. Taken together, these findings support the technical feasibility of the OSE-PALF and underscore visualization-related advantages that may facilitate safer fusion at the craniovertebral junction.

Similar to other spinal endoscopic procedures, preoperative fluoroscopic localization and precise working channel placement are critical. In practice, mark the C2 laminar isthmus and the lateral mass joint under C-arm fluoroscopic guidance, then dock the guide rod on the C2 isthmus, thereby enabling rapid identification of key endoscopic landmarks and reducing the risk of disorientation and neurovascular injury.25 Achieve endoscopic exposure of the C2 isthmus combined with subperiosteal dissection to reliably identify the lateral mass joint. Maintain a clear field with continuous low-pressure irrigation and control venous plexus bleeding with low-power, punctate bipolar coagulation; as needed, supplement with hemostatic materials to achieve targeted hemostasis. Given the confined local anatomy, the surgeon should be proficient in the spatial relationships of critical structures and the operative safety margins. If feasible, it is preferable to receive standardized cadaveric training before clinical implementation.26 Finally, teams should predefine conversion criteria (eg, uncontrolled venous bleeding, loss of bony landmarks, or significant anatomic variation) and preserve the capability for open atlantoaxial fusion to manage scenarios where further endoscopic procedures would be unsafe.27

Graft materials may include autologous iliac bone, allogeneic cancellous bone, interfacet cages, or titanium cages.28,29 Prior studies indicate that interfacet cages can help maintain atlantoaxial biomechanics and are associated with higher fusion rates.30 Other reports have described patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cages for anatomic variants to optimize conformity.6 However, in pediatric patients’ skeletal immaturity, cage-related distraction may impose excessive tension and potentially affect the growth plate, requiring cautious evaluation. In this case, we performed interfacet bone grafting with allogeneic cancellous bone and employed screw-rod fixation to provide a stable fusion environment. At 3-month follow-up, CT revealed a continuous bony bridge across the lateral mass joint, indicating early osseous fusion. Although longer-term outcomes require further observation and validation, the present findings support the feasibility and safety of this technique.

Candidate selection should exclude patients with substantial anatomic variation or deformity and be guided by a comprehensive preoperative imaging assessment. Common complications include vertebral artery injury, venous plexus bleeding, and nerve root irritation. Limited dissection and meticulous hemostasis help reduce their incidence. Attention must be paid to predefined conversion criteria to ensure safety. Obtain scheduled imaging follow-ups to monitor fusion maturation and track changes in pain scores, functional scales, and activity metrics to support prognostic assessment.

Limitations

This study could be viewed as a successful exploration of the novel technique’s feasibility and offers practical guidance for future work. However, there are several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, multicenter cohort studies and, ideally, prospective randomized controlled trials are required to compare this approach with open fusion across perioperative and clinical outcomes, including hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, fusion status, and complication rates. Given the limited follow-up duration, long-term observational data remain insufficient. We are refining this work to enable a more comprehensive evaluation.

Conclusion

This is the first study to report the clinical feasibility and potential technical advantages of OSE-PALF. This procedure may expand endoscopic applications at the craniovertebral junction and lay the groundwork for multicenter cohort studies and broader clinical adoption.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1.

Online Supplementary Video 1.

Footnotes

  • Funding The present research was supported by: (1) Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (Grant number: YCBZ2025134). (2) The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 82360422). (3) Joint Project on Regional High-Incidence Diseases Research of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (Grant number: 2024GXNSFAA010073). (4) Guangxi Young and Middle-aged Teacher’s Basic Ability Promoting Project (Grant number: 2023KY0115). (5) Bethune Charity Foundation's "Constant Learning and Improvement-Medical Research" project.

  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

  • Patient Consent Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the parents of the minor patient. All identifying details have been anonymized to ensure confidentiality.

  • Ethics Approval This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (approval number: 2024-E0859).

  • Patient and Public Involvement Statement Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the minor patient included in the study.

  • Author Contributions Conceptualization and study design: Jiang Xue, Chong Liu. Methodology: Jiang Xue, Xinli Zhan. Technical Support: Tengyue Zhu. Writing and editing: Jiang Xue, Chengqian Huang. Funding acquisition: Chong Liu, Xinli Zhan. Data compilation: Shaofeng Wu, Songze Wu. Validation and Visualization: Jiang Xue, Liyi Chen. Supervision and final approval: Chong Liu, Xinli Zhan. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its content.

References

  1. 1.
    ↵
    Yin Q , Wang J . Current trends in management of atlantoaxial dislocation. Orthop Surg. 2015;7(3):189–199. 10.1111/os.12196
  2. 2.
    ↵
    Yang SY , Boniello AJ , Poorman CE , Chang AL , Wang S , Passias PG . A review of the diagnosis and treatment of atlantoaxial dislocations. Global Spine J. 2014;4(3):197–210. 10.1055/s-0034-1376371
  3. 3.
    ↵
    Huang D-G , Hao D-J , He B-R , et al . Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: a review of all techniques. Spine J. 2015;15(10):2271–2281. 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.008
  4. 4.
    ↵
    Gelinne A , Piazza M , Bhowmick DA . Minimally invasive modification of the Goel-Harms atlantoaxial fusion technique: a case series and illustrative guide. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(3):E14. 10.3171/2022.12.FOCUS22635
  5. 5.
    ↵
    Elliott RE , Tanweer O , Boah A , et al . Atlantoaxial fusion with screw-rod constructs: meta-analysis and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(2):411–421. 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.013
  6. 6.
    ↵
    Hung K-L , Lu Y , Tian Y , et al . Minimally invasive surgery for posterior atlantoaxial lateral mass joint fusion (MIS-PALF): a muscle-sparing procedure for atlantoaxial instability or dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024;106(23):2215–2222. 10.2106/JBJS.23.01464
  7. 7.
    ↵
    Xu Z , Wu J , Chen F , et al . Atlantoaxial intra-articular cage fusion by posterior intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a technique note with case series. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(8):3060–3068. 10.1007/s00586-024-08318-2
  8. 8.
    ↵
    McGrath LB , White-Dzuro GA , Hofstetter CP . Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(4):491–499. 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689
  9. 9.
    ↵
    Carr DA , Abecassis IJ , Hofstetter CP . Full endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of the cervical spine: surgical technique and early experience. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(2):447–456. 10.21037/jss.2020.01.03
  10. 10.
    ↵
    Hofstetter CP , Ahn Y , Choi G , et al . AOSpine consensus paper on nomenclature for working-channel endoscopic spinal procedures. Global Spine J. 2020;10(2 Suppl):111S–121S. 10.1177/2192568219887364
  11. 11.
    ↵
    Zhao XB , Ma YJ , Ma HJ , Zhang XY , Zhou HG . Clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for symptomatic cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(5):876–884. 10.1111/os.13237
  12. 12.
    ↵
    Jang JW , Lee DG , Park CK . Rationale and advantages of endoscopic spine surgery. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(suppl 3):S11–S20. 10.14444/8160
  13. 13.
    ↵
    Huang CC , Fitts J , Huie D , Bhowmick DA , Abd-El-Barr MM . Evolution of cervical endoscopic spine surgery: current progress and future directions—a narrative review. JCM. 2024;13(7):2122. 10.3390/jcm13072122
  14. 14.
    ↵
    Zheng G , Zhou F , Yuan B , et al . Novel radiographic parameters for posterior atlantoaxial dislocation secondary to os odontoideum and its clinical significance. World Neurosurg. 2023;178:e692–e699. 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.145
  15. 15.
    ↵
    Wang S , Wang C , Yan M , Zhou H , Dang G . Novel surgical classification and treatment strategy for atlantoaxial dislocations. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 2013;38(21):E1348–E1356. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a1e5e4
  16. 16.
    ↵
    Wang Q , Dong S , Wang F . Os odontoideum: diagnosis and role of imaging. Surg Radiol Anat. 2020;42(2):155–160. 10.1007/s00276-019-02351-3
  17. 17.
    ↵
    Ning S , Yang S , Ding W , Ma T , Wu Z . Posterior atlantoaxial dislocation without fracture or neurological symptoms treated by transoral-posterior approach surgery: a case report and literature review. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(Suppl 2):37–40. 10.1007/s00586-018-5823-6
  18. 18.
    ↵
    Riascos R , Bonfante E , Cotes C , Guirguis M , Hakimelahi R , West C . Imaging of atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial traumatic injuries: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics. 2015;35(7):2121–2134. 10.1148/rg.2015150035
  19. 19.
    ↵
    Duan S , Lv S , Ye F , Lin Q . Imaging anatomy and variation of vertebral artery and bone structure at craniocervical junction. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(8):1102–1108. 10.1007/s00586-009-0925-9
  20. 20.
    ↵
    Bailitz J , Starr F , Beecroft M , et al . CT should replace three-view radiographs as the initial screening test in patients at high, moderate, and low risk for blunt cervical spine injury: a prospective comparison. J Trauma. 2009;66(6):1605–1609. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5b0cc
  21. 21.
    ↵
    Riew K , Raich A , Dettori J , Heller J . Neck pain following cervical laminoplasty: does preservation of the C2 muscle attachments and/or C7 matter? Evid Based Spine Care J. 2013;04(1):042–053. 10.1055/s-0033-1341606
  22. 22.
    ↵
    Goel A , Jain S , Shah A , et al . Atlantoaxial fixation for odontoid fracture: analysis of 124 surgically treated cases. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:558–567. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.192
  23. 23.
    ↵
    Kwon H , Park JY . The role and future of endoscopic spine surgery: a narrative review. Neurospine. 2023;20(1):43–55. 10.14245/ns.2346236.118
  24. 24.
    ↵
    Pholprajug P , Kotheeranurak V , Liu Y , Kim JS . The endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: a narrative review, and future perspective. Neurospine. 2023;20(4):1224–1245. 10.14245/ns.2346888.444
  25. 25.
    ↵
    Yadav YR , Lucano A , Ratre S , Parihar VS . Practical aspects and avoidance of complications in microendoscopic spine surgeries: a review. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2019;80(04):291–301. 10.1055/s-0039-1677825
  26. 26.
    ↵
    Srikantha U , Khanapure KS , Jagannatha AT , Joshi KC , Varma RG , Hegde AS . Minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion: cadaveric study and report of 5 clinical cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(6):675–680. 10.3171/2016.5.SPINE151459
  27. 27.
    ↵
    Song R , Fan D , Wu H , et al . Management of unusual atlantoaxial dislocation. Spine (Phila Pa 1986). 2017;42(8):573–577. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001872
  28. 28.
    ↵
    Anand SK , Shanahan RM , Alattar AA , Phillips HW , Okonkwo DO , McDowell MM . Atlantoaxial facet fixation using cervical facet cage: technical case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2024;40(7):2193–2197. 10.1007/s00381-024-06339-2
  29. 29.
    ↵
    Turel MK , Kerolus MG , Traynelis VC . Machined cervical interfacet allograft spacers for the management of atlantoaxial instability. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2017;8(4):332–337. 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_87_17
  30. 30.
    ↵
    Sommer F , Kirnaz S , Goldberg JL , et al . Safety and feasibility of DTRAX cervical cages in the atlantoaxial joint for C1/2 stabilization. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022;22(5):322–327. 10.1227/ons.0000000000000139
View Abstract
Loading
Loading