TY - JOUR T1 - Readability Analysis of Patient-Accessible Information Regarding Ambulatory Surgical Center Procedures JF - International Journal of Spine Surgery JO - Int J Spine Surg SP - 1046 LP - 1053 DO - 10.14444/8133 VL - 15 IS - 5 AU - Conor P. Lynch AU - Elliot D.K. Cha AU - Nathaniel W. Jenkins AU - James M. Parrish AU - Shruthi Mohan AU - Cara E. Geoghegan AU - Caroline N. Jadczak AU - Kern Singh Y1 - 2021/10/01 UR - http://ijssurgery.com//content/15/5/1046.abstract N2 - Background: As spine surgery in the ambulatory setting becomes more frequent, patients should comprehend the difference from traditional hospital-based, outpatient settings. Limited research exists on the readability of online articles surrounding spine surgery in the ambulatory surgery center (ASC). In this study, we intend to evaluate the readability of online articles pertaining to spine surgery in the outpatient and ambulatory surgical settings.Methods: Three search engines were queried, and the first 100 articles pertaining to each outpatient spine surgery search term were collected. Advertisements, videos, and peer-reviewed scientific articles were excluded. Articles were categorized by publishing source as follows: hospital or institution, general medical Websites, private practice, or surgery center. Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade level, Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score, word count, sentences per paragraph, words per sentence, and characters per word were evaluated for each article. Student's t tests compared readability metrics between groups based on setting and procedure region.Results: A total of 342 articles was analyzed; 279 articles were outpatient hospital related, and 63 ASC related. Flesch-Kincaid grade levels or FRE scores were not significantly different between outpatient hospital and ambulatory center. Comparison of ASC to outpatient articles from a hospital or institution source significantly differed in FRE score (40.7 versus 32.4) and FK grade level (12.3 versus 13.9; all P < .05). Articles addressing procedure type were significantly different in FRE score (36.2 versus 30.0) and FK grade level (13.0 ± 2.1 versus 14.3 ± 1.8).Conclusions: Hospital, private practice, and medical journalists should be aware of significant differences in readability of patient-accessible ASC articles. These articles may be more difficult to read than outpatient hospital articles, and production of more reading-level-appropriate online literature is required.Level of Evidence: 3Clinical Relevance: There is a significant difference in the readability of patient-accessible ASC articles. ER -